The Economy

During oral questions on the economy, the Conservatives asked whether the government would admit Canada is in a cost-of-living crisis, pointing to the Parliamentary Budget Officer’s growth estimate, unemployment at 6.7%, and rising food bank use. The government answered that affordability is its top priority and cited its affordable housing spending, the suspended federal gas tax, the Canada child benefit, the school food program, and the disability benefit, while noting the Conservatives voted against those measures. The Bloc Québécois raised concerns about Bill C-39, the Building Canada Strong Act, saying it gives ministers too much power over projects and threatens Quebec’s say over its land, Indigenous rights, workers’ strike rights, and the environment. The government replied that the bill will create jobs and major projects for Quebec and the rest of Canada and encouraged the Bloc to support it.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Yves-François Blanchet, Beloeil—Chambly

Bloc Québécois
“This bill gives the government too much power and hurts the environment. It could let ministers control all of Quebec without ever asking Quebec first. I want the Prime Minister to admit this bill goes against Quebec's interests.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, yesterday, Liberal ministers showed up in committee to defend the abuses of power in Bill C‑39, a bill that even Stephen Harper would not have dared dream of introducing, as La Presse editorial writer Paul Journet noted yesterday. In theory, according to one minister’s testimony, all of Quebec could become a region of national interest, even though the Liberals obviously do not see why they would go that far. That is how much power the bill gives them at the expense of the environment. Does the Prime Minister realize that his bill is clearly contrary to Quebec’s national interest when Quebec was never consulted?

Yves-François Blanchet, Beloeil—Chambly

Bloc Québécois
“I want the Prime Minister to answer my question. This bill harms Indigenous people, workers' rights, the environment, and Quebec's control over its own land. How can the government claim that doing all of this unites the country?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, democracy and the art of answering questions are having a very bad day. Indigenous communities are concerned about being dispossessed of their land. Environmentalists are alarmed by the Prime Minister’s shift toward oil. Workers are outraged that their right to strike has been taken away. The government could take control of parts of Quebec’s territory outside the rule of law. Does the Prime Minister think that harming indigenous people, labour rights, the fight against climate change and the territorial sovereignty of Quebec and the provinces constitute the national interest, national unity or consensus?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 151

  1. Government Orders Strengthening Canada's Defence Sector Act 79 statements
  2. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 5 statements
  3. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Environment 2 statements
  6. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 15 statements
  7. Oral Questions Canadian Culture and Identity 4 statements
  8. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 11 statements
  9. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Employment 10 statements
  11. Oral Questions International Trade 7 statements
  12. Oral Questions Finance 8 statements
  13. Oral Questions Small Business 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Health 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Justice 2 statements
  17. Government Orders Government Orders 2 statements
  18. Government Orders Strengthening Canada's Defence Sector Act 44 statements
  19. Private Members' Business Canada Revenue Agency Act 6 statements
  20. Government Orders Canadian Fuel Affordability Act 164 statements
  21. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  22. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  23. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements