Labour

During question period on labour, Conservatives asked about a government change set for November 3 that they said would end the requirement for employers to prove they tried to hire a Canadian before bringing in workers from abroad, arguing this came as 68,000 Canadians lost jobs and as the Edmonton video game company BioWare closed. Liberals said the policy favours workers with Canadian work experience for high-wage jobs and simplifies hiring in fields like health care, engineering, technology and the trades, citing Canadian Chamber of Commerce support and saying the change applies to permanent residents already in Canada and cuts red tape. The immigration minister accused a Conservative member of misleading Canadians on what the measure covers.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

3 statements

Leslie Church, Parliamentary Secretary to the Secretaries of State for Labour, for Seniors, and for Children and Youth, and to the Minister of Jobs and Families (Persons with Disabilities)

Liberal
“We prioritize workers with Canadian work experience for high-wage jobs. This makes it easier to hire skilled people in fields like health care, engineering, technology, and the trades, which keeps our economy strong.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 91 of 100

    Of this answer, 93% addressed the question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we will always favour Canadian labour and Canadian workers. What we are doing is ensuring that candidates with strong Canadian work experience for job offers in high-wage occupations are prioritized. It is a simpler process for key in-demand fields and for ensuring that we can recruit top, skilled talent. We are talking about health care. We are talking about engineering, technology and the skilled trades. This is core to our ability to build a strong economy, for our economic success and for supporting Canadian businesses right across the country.

Lena Metlege Diab, Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship

Liberal
“Our changes to the immigration system are helping our economy grow. The Canadian Chamber of Commerce supports these changes because they cut red tape and help businesses keep skilled workers.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 46 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I welcome that question. In fact, I have been waiting to answer that. We have a clear focus building the strongest economy in the G7. Let me tell you what the Canadian Chamber of Commerce just posted: We welcome these changes to Express Entry and applaud the government and Minister Diab’s endeavour to reduce red tape in the immigration system, while also ensuring that international talent remains in Canada to fill labour gaps. In particular, eliminating the LMIA requirement for qualifying job offers—

Lena Metlege Diab, Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship

Liberal
“The member is misleading Canadians, and she has been here long enough to know better. This change is for permanent residents who already live here, not temporary foreign workers. It cuts red tape, makes things simpler, and helps businesses and skilled workers.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Respect 90 of 100

    This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “She is continually misleading Canadians”.

    See full analysis
  • A repeated line

    “Let me set the record straight.”

    Said 3 times by 2 members since May 28.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, let me set the record straight. The member has been in that seat for 10 or 11 years, and she knows better. She is continually misleading Canadians. This is a measure for permanent residents who are already here. This is cutting red tape and making it simpler. It is better. It is good for businesses. It is good for employers. Skilled individuals will be using it. This is not for temporary foreign workers.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 152

  1. Oral Questions The Economy 11 statements
  2. Oral Questions Government Priorities 4 statements
  3. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  4. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 7 statements
  5. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 3 statements
  6. Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
  7. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 2 statements
  8. Oral Questions Housing 11 statements
  9. Oral Questions Immigration 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Natural Resources 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Public Safety 6 statements
  12. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Air Transportation 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Labour 6 statements
  15. Oral Questions Justice 2 statements
  16. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 47 statements
  17. Oral Questions The Economy 11 statements
  18. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  19. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  20. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  21. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  22. Private Members' Business Georgina's Law 11 statements