Adjournment Proceedings

An adjournment debate on the federal firearms buyback program for previously banned guns, specifically whether owners will be compensated if shipping problems caused their guns to arrive late. Alex Ruff of the Conservatives described delivery companies refusing to accept firearms, boxes arriving late or incomplete, and wrong addresses, and asked that owners be paid despite missed deadlines. Parliamentary Secretary Jacques Ramsay said the program is on time and on budget, that owners will receive fair compensation, and that the deadline has been extended for those having shipping trouble; he later said experts, not politicians, determined which firearms count as assault-style weapons, and pointed to the government’s broader measures on borders, smuggling penalties, licence revocation in domestic-violence cases, and gang-violence funding. Ruff also challenged the description of the banned guns as military-style, saying only one rifle on the list had military use, and asked how the term was defined.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Jacques Ramsay, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Safety

Liberal
“Our gun buyback program is working, on time, and on budget. We banned these dangerous guns to keep Canadians safe. Owners who turn them in will get fair compensation. If anyone is having trouble shipping their guns, we have extended the deadline and can help them.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, to go straight to the matter, the answer to the question of the hon. member is, yes, they should get the fair compensation to which they are entitled. If they do not, please come to me. We will make sure they do. I am pleased to respond to the hon. member for Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound. He told us that some of his constituents had difficulty returning their firearms. He took this to heart, and I want to thank him for helping his constituents do the right thing. Today, I want to speak about our government’s commitment to strengthening gun control in Canada and our progress in delivering an efficient compensation program to affected firearms owners. In 2020, following the deadliest mass shooting in Canadian history in Portapique, Nova Scotia, where 22 plus one people died, the government took the decision that the significant risk certain firearms pose outweighed any justification for their continued availability within Canada and, hence, banned over 2,000 makes and models. These are firearms that are not appropriate for hunting or sport shooting and exceed safe civilian use. Additional assault-style firearms were banned in December 2024 and March 2025, totalling approximately 2,500 prohibited firearms. In all fairness, banning these firearms implied a fair compensation for those firearm owners, hence, the compensation program. Now nearing its completion, the government is continuing to successfully collect firearms for compensation. We are delivering this program on time and within the funding envelope approved by Parliament. Since January 2026, close to 100 assault-style firearms have been declared in the compensation program for individual owners and businesses. More than 40,000 individuals have been turning in their firearms to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, local police services or secure mobile collection units over the past month. In a small number of cases, for example, owners who live very far from an in-person collection location, the program has recently invited them to ship their firearms. While most owners have successfully shipped their firearms, we are indeed aware that others may have faced challenges. In those cases, shipping deadlines have been extended. At any rate, our call centre staff have been and are still available to help resolve any issues participants may face with shipping or any other concerns. For their reference, the number is 1-833-759-4551. We remain committed to supporting owners who declare their firearms so that they can fully participate and receive compensation. Individuals who have had difficulty shipping will be accommodated past the program deadline. The success of the program for individuals builds on the success of the business program. That program has been able to claim over 61,000 firearms. These businesses continue to ship their firearms and receive fair compensation in return. We are serious about removing assault-style firearms from our streets to limit the devastating effects of firearm violence.

Jacques Ramsay, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Safety

Liberal
“Experts, not politicians, decided which firearms are assault-style weapons based on the huge damage they can cause. Stopping gun violence takes more than one program. Our plan also includes stronger borders, tougher penalties for smuggling guns, taking away licences in cases of domestic abuse, and funding to stop gang violence. We are keeping Canadians safe while treating law-abiding gun owners fairly.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we have left it to experts to determine which firearms are assault rifles. This is not a political matter. It is for experts to decide. Basically, there are firearms that can do massive amounts of damage, as we have seen in mass shootings recently. No single program in this initiative can tackle the challenge of gun violence alone. As a matter of fact, the government’s comprehensive plan to keep Canadians safe from guns also includes, and this is important to mention, strengthening our borders, tougher penalties for smuggling guns, red flag laws and the revocation of licences in cases of intimate partner violence. There is also the gun and gang violence action fund and the building safer communities fund. With these initiatives, the government is taking concrete steps to make Canada less vulnerable to firearm violence, while being fair to responsible and law-abiding firearms owners.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 158

  1. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 38 statements
  2. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 81 statements
  3. Oral Questions International Trade 18 statements
  4. Oral Questions Finance 14 statements
  5. Oral Questions Justice 8 statements
  6. Oral Questions Public Safety 2 statements
  7. Oral Questions International Trade 2 statements
  8. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 8 statements
  9. Oral Questions Government Appointments 5 statements
  10. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 7 statements
  11. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Taxation 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions The Environment 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Business of the House 2 statements
  17. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 23 statements
  18. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  19. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 42 statements
  20. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Relations 4 statements
  21. Oral Questions Public Safety 2 statements
  22. Oral Questions Families, Children and Social Development 2 statements
  23. Private Members' Business National Strategy for Soil Health Act 16 statements
  24. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  25. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  26. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements