MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Burton Bailey

Follow by RSS

Bailey presses for lower federal spending and tax relief, sponsoring Bill C-275 to criminalize sexual assault material, backing a diesel tax cut and faster pipeline approvals, and demanding answers on the $300-million PrescribeIT scandal and health care for rejected asylum claimants. He often asserts a conclusion without giving a reason, declaring, “we would be an energy superpower” or blaming “years of Liberal soft-on-crime policies that drove violent crimes up.” He backs many claims with figures drawn from outside reports.Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
A–
89 / 100 over 30 statements
Signal 81 / 100
Relevance 89 / 100
Respect 100 / 100
Clarity 96 / 100
No habit stands out from the typical statement here. Averaged over the 30 of 39 statements graded so far.

Statements 39

Government Orders ·

Business of Supply

“The government is spending more on interest on its debt than on health care. By 2030, that interest will cost $83 billion, while health care transfers will only be $67 billion. Will the government promise that debt interest will never cost more than health care in future budgets?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the government often says health care is a priority, yet the PBO shows that the debt servicing spending this year already exceeds the health transfers. By 2030, the debt servicing cost will hit $83 billion, while health care transfers are projected to only be $67 billion. Will the Liberal government commit that no future budget will allow the debt charges to exceed the Canadian health transfers?

“I want my colleague to name a few ways the Liberal government could cut federal spending and control its budget.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my colleague’s speech was excellent. I would like to ask a very simple question: Could the member think of just a few ways the Liberal government could lower federal spending to get its budget under control?

“The government now spends more on interest for its debt than it sends to provinces for health care. I want to know if the government will cut its spending so life can be more affordable for Canadians.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, according to the Parliamentary Budget Officer, public debt charges are the fastest-growing major expense and have already surpassed Canada health transfer payments. That means Canadians are paying more to service debt than they receive for health care. Can my hon. colleague think of a few ways the Liberal government could improve the amount of debt? Could it cut back on its spending so that Canadians can live more affordably?

Government Orders ·

Business of Supply

“Why should people in Quebec trust another Liberal promise when the government fails to deliver on so many policies?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I have a simple question. Why should Quebeckers have confidence in another Liberal commitment when the government’s record, across multiple policies, continues to raise questions about delivery?

“How many empty promises will it take for the Liberals to admit that announcements are not results?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the simple question I would like to ask the hon. parliamentary secretary is this: How many empty promises will it take before the Liberals admit that announcements and press conferences are not the same as results?

“The previous Conservative government recognized Quebec as a nation. Quebec asks for more independence than other provinces get. I am asking the member if he agrees that provinces like Alberta also deserve more control over their own affairs, like immigration, instead of federal control.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Relevance 26 of 100

    None of this question addressed the preceding speech or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it was the Conservative government, under then prime minister Harper, that recognized Quebec as a nation. Culture, language and shared ancestry all played a part in determining what a nation is. With this in mind, the province of Quebec demands a level of autonomy that other provinces do not benefit from in Canada. Would my colleague agree that the other provinces in Canada, such as Alberta, deserve more autonomy, away from the heavy hand of the federal government, in determining what is the best direction for their province, as with immigration, for example?

“The government's streaming law failed. It created more problems for our arts and culture industry and is making Canadians pay for it. I want the Liberal member to admit this.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I would like to quote Michael Geist, Canada research chair in Internet and e-commerce law: “Patching the old broadcast contribution system onto the Internet was never a good idea, and starting over creates an opportunity for a much-needed full reset and the chance to provide more sensible answers to those questions.” Would the Liberal member agree that the Liberal government failed with the Online Streaming Act, simply creating more problems for Canadians and the arts and culture industry, and is once again having Canadians foot the bill?

Government Orders ·

Business of Supply

In response to a question from Cheryl Gallant

“If we built pipelines, Canada would control its own fuel prices and farmers would pay less. Pipelines could be built in a few years, but the government's rules and poor planning delay or cancel them. Private companies should build them instead of the government so they get done faster.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I have a lot to say about that. The first thing I would like to say is we would be an energy superpower. We would have a stockpile. We would be able to control our fuel prices. Farmers would not be facing twice the price in fuel costs from year to year. The actual building of a pipeline, if the bureaucracy of the Liberal government was not in the way, could be accomplished in a couple of years. The problem is that the Liberals continue to not consult with the provinces and they leave it to the last minute, and the next thing we know, the project is stalled or cancelled. We cannot build pipelines with government money. It needs to be the private sector building these projects, because they will then get done in a reasonable time.

In response to a question from Andréanne Larouche

“Liberal members shut down our bill to protect natural health products. Most Canadians use these products, and now they will have to pay more for Canadian rules or buy them from the United States. Conservatives will keep fighting for natural health products.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, this is a very important question. Bill C-224 was shut down yesterday at the health committee and stripped line by line. I felt like we had been misled by the Liberal health committee members. This is truly going to hurt all of the natural health products people. The 80% of Canadians who use these products are going to be forced to either purchase them from the United States at a cheaper rate or pay more to have Canadian labelling and the bureaucracy of Health Canada. I am still reeling from it, but I can assure members that the Conservatives will continue to fight for natural health products, and we will hear more about it in the House when this blank piece of paper that has been worked on since 2023 is presented in the House.

In response to a question from Kevin Lamoureux

“The government's plans do not fix high living costs. They just send out one-time cheques instead of offering real solutions. I want the House to use the Conservative plan to help Canadians instead.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister has been in power for 18 months and yesterday, he said he just got here. For the first time, I heard his parliamentary secretary say we are in an affordability crisis. Every time we talk about these programs, they are band-aids. We need solutions. The Conservatives have put forward a list of things that would make a difference to Canadians, not just a cheque in the mail that is a band-aid.

In response to a question from Luc Thériault

“I want the House to vote for our motion saying Canada has an affordability crisis. Food and housing cost too much, and people are taking on too much debt. I blame the government's high taxes, heavy rules, and blocks on energy projects. We want to cut taxes on fuel and approve projects faster to lower costs.”
  • A repeated line

    “After 11 years of the Liberal government.”

    Said 25 times by 19 members since April 30.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to address our Conservative motion calling on this House to recognize that Canada is in an affordability crisis. For workers whose paycheques are barely covering their monthly expenses, families worrying about whether they will be able to provide nutritious food for their kids or even put them in extracurricular activities, low-income seniors whose pensions are dwindling by the day and young people who cannot even dream of ever owning a home, let alone starting a family, this affordability crisis is clear to them. However, unfortunately, to the Liberal government, it seems unclear. For 11 years, the Liberals have been in power, controlling the levers of government spending and implementing policies that have negatively impacted the economy and social fabric of this nation, yet there is always someone or something else to blame but themselves. True leadership means taking responsibility, not passing the buck. After 11 years, the bank is dry. There are no more bucks to be passed. Canadians are living through it every day at the grocery store. “Canada’s Food Price Report 2026“ estimated that a family of four would spend an average of $17,500 on food. That is up nearly $1,000 from the year before. One-quarter of Canadian households are food insecure. That is 2.75 million households, or nearly 10 million people. In Canada, a G7 country, that is a shocking number. In Red Deer, the food bank distributed more than 1.6 million pounds of food in 2025 and helped more than 30,500 families across the region. MNP’s latest consumer debt index found that 54% of Canadians say they “do not have enough savings to support themselves or their family for six months” if they were to lose their job, and 44% of Canadians report “being $200 or less away from financial insolvency each month.” These are not just numbers in reports. There are real Canadians and real people behind these unfortunate statistics, and things are not getting better. Let us talk about housing. Habitat for Humanity reported that 56% of Canadian non-homeowners do not expect to ever own a home. That is the highest number among the 22 countries surveyed. The Liberals have spent 11 years announcing housing plans, but their own agencies keep confirming that nothing is getting built. For young people in Canada, it is even worse. Almost two-thirds are saying housing costs are making it difficult to start a family. The family unit is the backbone of a cohesive and flourishing society. No matter what kind of NGO or special interest group tries to change that, it will always be true. When families are not treated as the base formation of our society pyramid, everything begins to crumble. As more and more young Canadians are struggling to start a family, our social fabric unravels. Canada is then stuck in a feedback loop of endless waves of unaffordability, unemployment and immigration. Rinse and repeat. Affordability, taxes and the cost of living are some of the primary determinants of how many Canadians start a family. It is incumbent on the government to make life more affordable, not less. How does the government make money? Of course, there is no such thing as government money. The answer is taxes. The government collects taxes from Canadians and in turn provides services and protection. That is the basis of the social contract, but the social contract that Canadians are obligated to agree to has been ripped up by the Liberals. Their services are not serving and Canadians do not feel safe. Why is that? Why, after over a decade of the Liberal government, has Canada gone from being the envy of the world to having that reputation reversed? Of course, as Carville famously said, “It’s the economy”. For over a decade, the Liberal government has blocked, stalled, delayed and denied nation-building, enriching and unifying projects. Liberal politics of division and pitting one region against another to score political points have sacrificed Canadian unity and economic prosperity for election results. Canada should have some of the most affordable energy on the planet. We have the resources, we have the workers and we have the know-how. Recently, the Liberals found something else to blame: foreign wars. Here is the truth. Foreign wars and conflicts outside of our borders should not dictate whether Canada could be a self-sustaining energy superpower. It should already have been done. Record fuel costs did not magically appear. They are a result of a government that treats the Canadian energy and natural resource industry as a problem to be managed rather than the advantage it is. The Conservatives would provide emergency prepermitting and tax relief for the construction of refineries, pipelines, rail and storage; eliminate all federal taxes on diesel consumption until at least Canada Day 2027; permanently eliminate taxes on diesel production; and increase production to one million barrels per day so that Canadians are never again dependent on foreign oil. Speaking of buying foreign products, how about buying Canadian? Just yesterday at the health committee, the Liberals made a decision to decimate another Canadian industry. It was the quiet killing of small businesses in a sector millions of Canadians rely on every day. I am speaking of the natural health products industry. For decades, NHPs like vitamins, minerals, probiotics, herbal remedies and traditional Chinese medicines have been regulated and approved by Health Canada. The system worked as intended and the natural health products industry thrived across Canada. It was thriving so much that 80% of Canadians use NHPs. Canadian-owned small businesses like health food stores were growing and thriving. However, in 2023, the Liberal government decided to seize more bureaucratic power and regulate natural health products in the same way as therapeutic drugs manufactured by big pharma and multinationals. That meant more regulations for small businesses, including new labelling, new fees and new penalties. A system that had been functioning properly for decades changed overnight. Canadian products were now required to go through more government, while any product could be purchased over the Internet and shipped into our country with no safety standards or approval. Products are disappearing from Canadian shelves. Customers are ordering from the United States. Jobs are leaving and businesses are closing. The Conservative private member’s bill, Bill C-224, would have reversed the Liberal big government decision and brought NHPs back to the way they were regulated before 2023, when they were working just fine. However, just yesterday, the Liberals unashamedly stripped this bill word by word and will now return a blank piece of paper to this House. Millions of Canadians who rely on natural health products have just been told by the Liberal government, “Too bad”. Pay more or buy American is not pro-Canada, but after 11 years, this is the pattern of the Liberal government. A common-sense bill that would have supported small businesses and consumer choices has been killed by the Liberals. Another main street employer has been told to absorb more cost, making the affordability crisis worse. That is why the Conservatives brought forward this motion today. It is time for the Liberal government members to tell the truth. After 11 years of the Liberal government, Canada is in an affordability crisis. The Conservatives will always fight to save Canadians money. We have an economic action plan to save Canadians money and jobs. We would green-light the 500 projects waiting for approval, take the GST off Canadian-made autos, have zero capital gains on reinvestment in Canada, end the industrial carbon tax and repeal job-killing bills, Bill C-48 and Bill C-69. The Conservatives will fight for common-sense policies that would improve Canadian lives with stronger paycheques, lower food costs, homes Canadians can afford and an economy that rewards hard work. The Liberals must acknowledge the crisis of their making and vote for this Conservative motion.

Statements by Members ·

Employment

“Government policies have raised costs by up to 60 percent for Technalogix, a manufacturer in Red Deer. Fifty-two people there might lose their jobs because of this. The government must end the policies that raise costs for Canadian businesses.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, 52 Albertans fear for their jobs because the Liberal government is failing Canadian businesses thanks to rising costs they are struggling to absorb. Technalogix is a 37-year-old Red Deer manufacturer of broadcasting and radar technology. It is getting squeezed by policies that hurt Canadian businesses. Added costs of up to 60% are already making Canadian-built equipment far less competitive. Technalogix is paying more for everything. It wrote to the finance minister about this and has not heard anything yet. Families are already dealing with an affordability crisis. When local employers are forced to cut jobs, that hardship lands directly on household budgets. The government must act now and end policies that raise the price of Canadian production. Skilled Red Deer jobs and other Canadian-owned businesses are at risk. They need a level playing field and a fair chance to keep their jobs.

Statements by Members ·

Diesel Prices

“Diesel prices went up 80% this year, raising grocery costs. Liberal policies caused this. I want the government to vote for our plan to cut diesel taxes until Canada Day, speed up energy projects, and produce more Canadian fuel.”
  • A repeated line

    “Ordinary Canadians are paying the price.”

    Said 8 times by 8 members since May 7.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, fuel costs have hit record highs, and working Canadians are paying the price. Diesel has gone up 80% in a year. Farmers are spending thousands of dollars a day to keep feeding the country, and those costs hit every grocery bill. Canada should have some of the most affordable energy on the planet, but a decade of Liberal blocking, stalling and delaying has led us here. Foreign wars outside of our borders should not dictate Canada’s ability to be a self-sustaining energy superpower. The Conservatives have an emergency fuel relief plan to support Canadian diesel. We would fast-track permitting to build pipelines, refineries and energy storage, eliminate all federal taxes on diesel at least until Canada Day and increase production to one million barrels per day so that Canadians are never dependent on foreign oil again. Today, the Liberals can vote for the Conservative motion to give Canadians relief. Will they?

Government Orders ·

Building Canada Strong Act

“I do not support this bill. The government promised the last bill would speed up building, but 18 months later, it has issued zero permits and started no work. This new bill will not build anything either.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, the Prime Minister has been known for the phrase, “We will build at speeds not seen in generations”. The last time the government promised speeds not seen in generations, it was with Bill C-5. The Major Projects Office, 18 months later, has issued zero permits and zero workers are on the ground. What good is this bill if the first one did not get anything built?

“This bill still makes companies study gender and identity before they can build things like mines or pipelines. That is useless red tape. I want the government to drop these rules and start building.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, according to the bill, project proponents would still have to analyze “the intersection of sex and gender with other identity factors”. I am not sure what any of that has to do with building a pipeline or a mine, but this is the type of woke, bureaucratic language we have come to expect from the Liberals. It means absolutely nothing, and it maintains layers of red tape. My question is this: If the Liberals are trying to be taken seriously at a time that demands serious action, when will they drop the woke corporate-speak, pick up shovels and get building?

“This bill will not get projects built. 500 projects are already stuck waiting for permits. The government should approve those projects instead of passing another bill that adds more paperwork.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, the Liberals claim this bill would get projects built, but there are already 500 projects stuck in the federal permitting process. Why does the government not simply approve these projects instead of continuing to add more bureaucracy, more bills, more offices and more announcements that have not built anything?

“The government promised to build things quickly, but all they did was add the word strong to this bill's name. I want to ask my colleague if that word is the only thing the Liberals have built in the last 18 months.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my colleague just delivered an informative, excellent speech. Some hon. members: Oh, oh! Burton Bailey: Mr. Speaker, members can laugh all they want. The Liberal government’s Bill C-5 would create the Building Canada Act, and it was to build at speeds like nothing we have seen before. Bill C-39 adds the word “strong”. I would like to ask my hon. colleague if that word is the only thing that the Liberal government has built in the last 18 months.

“For ten years, the Liberals blocked major building projects in Canada. Now they suddenly support them. I want the Liberals to admit they changed their minds just to stay in power.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, for over a decade, the Liberals blocked, stalled and denied all kinds of projects across Canada that would have made us richer, more sovereign and less dependent on any other country. However, today, we are expected as Canadians to believe that the same people who filled Justin Trudeau’s caucus have suddenly turned a leaf and believe the opposite of what they have been saying for a decade. Will the Liberals admit they do not actually believe in anything and that every decision one Liberal makes is to keep another Liberal in power?

Government Orders ·

Bail and Sentencing Reform Act

“The Senate weakened this crime bill. I want the government to reject the Senate's changes and make the bill tougher on criminals again.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for his strong speech. After years of Liberal soft-on-crime policies that drove violent crimes up, Canadians are sadly paying the price in their communities every day, as he spoke of in his speech. Conservatives improved Bill C‑14 with key amendments in the House, but the majority Liberal, Trudeau-appointed Senate has once again watered it down, prioritizing criminals’ rights over public safety. Will my colleague join me in calling on the government to reject these weakening Senate amendments and restore the strong public safety version that Conservatives helped build?

Oral Questions ·

Health

“Liberals on the health committee are blocking an investigation into PrescribeIT to hide a 300 million dollar scandal. I want them to stop blocking it.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the $300 million Liberal cover-up continues. Liberals at the health committee continue blocking the investigation into PrescribeIT and hoping Canadians forget about the scandal that is turning into a possible contempt of Parliament. Even the Liberals were frustrated when they did not get answers from disgraced former CEO Michael Green, but then the Prime Minister yelled, “Be quiet,” and the cover-up began. When will the Liberals at the health committee find their spine and finally end the cover-up?