MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Eric Lefebvre

Follow by RSS

Lefebvre pushes for permanent tax cuts on gas and diesel while challenging the government over wasteful spending, such as the $200-million Nova Scotia lease. He uses financial data and personal stories to argue that government mismanagement is harming families. He builds his case on specific facts, often ending with a direct challenge: “If it were your money, what would you do?”Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
B+
83 / 100 over 60 statements
Signal 71 / 100
Relevance 67 / 100
Respect 100 / 100
Clarity 96 / 100
Loses points more than most for Something stated as certain with nothing to back it.1.6 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×1.6 Loses points less than most for A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.Less often than most members.What the tags mean Averaged over the 60 of 70 statements graded so far.

Statements 70

Government Orders ·

Business of Supply

“I want the minister to explain a bad deal. A private company pays $13,500 a year to rent land, but the government is paying that same company $20 million a year to rent it. The minister is avoiding my question.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, I hope that Canadians are watching. I just asked the minister to explain how we entered into a 10-year contract worth $20 million a year when a private company is renting that land for $13,500 a year. His response is that he is going to introduce me to some astronauts to avoid talking about this mismanagement. Again, a private company is renting property from the provincial government for $13,500 a year. That same company then turns around and rents out that same property to the federal government for $20 million a year for 10 years, or $200 million—

“The government created a new housing agency that adds red tape and builds no homes. Also, a private company rents land in Nova Scotia for $13,500 a year and is renting it back to the federal government for $20 million a year. That will cost $200 million over 10 years. I want to know if the minister thinks this is a good way to spend public money.”
  • A repeated line

    “That company then turned around and sublet the same land to the Liberal federal government for $20 million a year.”

    Said 3 times by 2 members since May 26.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, Build Canada Homes is another agency that the Liberal government just established. That means even more red tape, and we have not seen any real results in terms of new housing. I want to come back to another subject: the space launch pad in Nova Scotia. A private company is leasing land from the provincial government for $13,500 per year. That same private company then turned around and sublet the land to the Liberal federal government for $20 million per year. To make this even more profitable, a 10-year contract will be signed. We are talking about $200 million. I repeat: A private company is leasing land from the provincial government for $13,500 a year. That same company turned around and sublet the same land to the Liberal federal government for $20 million per year for 10 years, or $200 million. My question for the minister is simple. Is this sound management of public finances? Would he have signed this agreement if this were his own money?

“The government's new housing agency has only built 5,200 homes out of its 500,000 goal. That is just two percent, and at this rate it will take 50 years. I want to know why the government created this new agency when it works this slowly.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, we are talking about the number of homes built by this new organization established by the Liberal government, Build Canada Homes. The figure is 2%. Only 5,200 housing units out of a target of 500,000 have been built. That represents 2% of the target. At that rate, it would take nearly 50 years to meet the target. Is the minister aware that this cannot work at that pace? Why create a new organization like Build Canada Homes?

“The minister's numbers are wrong. Housing costs have gone up 30% since April 2021. How many homes are actually being built right now with the $13-billion housing program?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, I am going to have to correct the minister on that response. We are currently seeing an average increase of 3.6% year-over-year and a 30% increase since April 2021. The $13-billion Build Canada Homes program is a good way to build a number of homes. I would like to know how many housing units are currently being built through Build Canada Homes.

“I want to know how much rent has gone up in Quebec over the past few years.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, we are talking about affordability. I would like to know what the percentage increase in rent has been in Quebec over the past few years.

“The Prime Minister said that life has been hard to afford for over ten years. I want to know if the minister agrees with him.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, I have been involved in provincial and federal politics for 10 years. I have to give the minister credit: He came well prepared for the question period when he realized it was a possibility. I congratulate his team. On March 25, the Prime Minister said that affordability has not been good for over a decade. I want to know whether the minister shares the Prime Minister’s opinion.

“Butter cost nine dollars this morning. I want to know if the minister knows how much milk costs in Quebec.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, I would like to know where the minister does his shopping, because at the IGA this morning, a pound of butter was $8.99. I will follow up with another simple question. How much does a two-litre carton of milk currently cost in Quebec? Can the minister tell us the price of milk?

In response to a question from François-Philippe Champagne

“I want the minister to tell me how much a pound of butter costs in Quebec right now.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Signal 25 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, thank you for calling me to order. You are quite right. Here is my second, equally simple question for the minister, who has just confirmed that he does his own grocery shopping: How much does a pound of butter currently cost in Quebec?

In response to a question from François-Philippe Champagne

“We have been asking questions for three hours. The minister will not even answer a very simple question about whether he buys his own groceries.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, we have just seen the proof. We have been asking questions for three hours. I asked the easiest possible one: Does the minister do his own grocery shopping? It does not get any simpler than that.

“I want to know if the minister buys his own groceries.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, I am sure the minister is getting a little tired, so I will start off slowly. I would like to know whether the minister does his own grocery shopping.

“I am sharing my speaking time with my colleague. We have asked the minister questions for almost three hours and have not received real answers. I am giving the minister another chance to answer.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Signal 39 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, before I begin, I would like to note that I will be speaking for 10 minutes and sharing the last five minutes with my friend, the incredible member for Montmorency—Charlevoix, who will conclude these remarks. My colleagues have been asking the minister questions for nearly three hours now, but unfortunately, we have not received any answers to our real questions. Minister, I will give you another chance. It has been three hours, so I understand that you are tired. That is just how the human body works.

“The government's gas tax cut ends on Labour Day, right when back-to-school costs hit families. I want the minister to explain why he will not drop all gas taxes for the entire year.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Signal 44 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I will start with some praise for the minister. There is no doubt that, in the House, the minister uses Canada’s two official languages in his various speeches in a very equitable manner. I want to take this opportunity to thank him for that. However, now I would like to challenge the minister. The motion I moved today has to do with the gas tax. Right now, we have a half measure, or technically a third of a measure, that ends on Labour Day. Labour Day coincides with back-to-school season, when families usually incur additional expenses. I want to know why the minister is unwilling to adopt the Conservative proposal to eliminate all gas taxes for all of 2026. I challenge the minister to directly respond to my question.

In response to a question from François-Philippe Champagne

“The people in my riding voted Conservative because they are tired of Liberal overspending. The Liberals have doubled Canada's debt from $700 billion to $1.4 trillion, and it has to stop.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 30 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • A repeated line

    “After more than a decade of Liberal government.”

    Said 13 times by 11 members since May 7.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I want to start by saluting the people of Richmond—Arthabaska, who placed their trust in a Conservative MP. That is the choice the people of Richmond—Arthabaska made in the last election. They made that choice because they are sick and tired of watching the Liberals spend so recklessly. After a decade of Liberal government management, the country’s debt grew from $700 billion to $1.4 trillion, and the Liberals are still racking up charges on our children’s and future grandchildren’s credit card. The people of Richmond—Arthabaska know this has to stop.

In response to a question from Dan Mazier

“Lowering shipping and processing costs will make groceries cheaper. Canadians need that relief right now.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is not complicated. It is about the supply chain. Naturally, if we can lower processing and transportation costs, that will have a direct impact on grocery prices for Canadians. What Canadians need right now is some breathing room.

In response to a question from Gabriel Ste-Marie

“We want to cut rules, stop spending billions on consultants, and make government smaller. This will leave more money for taxpayers.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, our plan is clear. We want to cut the Liberal red tape. We want to cut spending on consultants, which amounts to several billion dollars. We want to reduce the size of government so we can put money back into taxpayers’ pockets. That is the Conservative plan.

In response to a question from Kevin Lamoureux

“The government's plan helps people for only part of the year. We want help that lasts all year.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 23 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Liberal member who asked me that question is the same member who denied that there were any seniors not receiving what the Liberal government owes them. His party whip had to call him to order. The measures the Liberal government has put in place are partial measures. They apply for only a third of the year. We are calling for a permanent measure for the entire year of 2026.

“I want the government to drop all federal taxes on gas and diesel for the rest of the year, including the GST. I also want it to permanently end the clean fuel standard. Canadians are paying too much for fuel and groceries, and the government's temporary tax cut does not go far enough.”
  • A repeated line

    “Ordinary Canadians are paying the price.”

    Said 8 times by 8 members since May 7.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

moved: That, given that, (i) gas prices are 13% higher in Canada than in the United States, equating to 22 cents more on average per litre, (ii) gas now costs 50 cents more per litre today than when global oil prices were at the same level in 2014, (iii) the Minister of Finance and National Revenue told Canadians on May 19, “We have already acted” (iv) Canadian families are still paying more to live due to a decade of Liberal credit card budgets, waste and mismanagement the House call on the government to offer Canadians immediate relief by ending all federal taxes on gas and diesel for the rest of the year, including the GST, and permanently scrap the Clean Fuel Standard. He said: Mr. Speaker, before I begin, I want to note that I will be sharing my time with the member for Cloverdale—Langley City. I am very pleased to rise in the House today to begin debate on a Conservative proposal to help Canadians. Our proposal is simple and clear: Immediately cancel all federal taxes on gas and diesel for the rest of 2026. We have been calling on the Liberals to do so since the beginning of the energy crisis in the Middle East. Given the global instability, a responsible government should have created a fiscal shield to protect its economy and its people. Unfortunately, the government chose to implement half measures. Our proposal will provide relief in the context of the current energy crisis and cost of living crisis. Every Canadian family, every farmer, every trucker and every small business is directly impacted by energy costs and the cost of living. Energy and affordability are the lifeblood of our country’s economy. Let us consider the facts. The numbers do not lie. Gas prices are now 13% higher in Canada than in the United States, equating to 22¢ more on average per litre for Canadians. Why such a big difference compared to our neighbours to the south? What is even more alarming is that gas costs 50¢ more per litre today than when global oil prices were at the same level in 2014. What is the government’s response to this dire situation? The Minister of Finance and National Revenue had the nerve to tell Canadians on May 19, “We have already acted”. Telling a family who can no longer fill their tank to get to work that the government has already acted is an insult to their daily realities. The truth is that the Liberals’ current plan is nothing more than a half measure. They offered to cut only a third of the taxes for a third of the year. The Prime Minister says he understands that affordability is an issue, but his plan provides only limited, short-term relief that will not significantly cut costs for people. It would be a mistake to believe that these promises will be kept when all the government does is suspend a tiny portion of the excise tax just from April 20 until Labour Day. Canadians do not need a tax holiday that ends right when the school year begins and they will have new costs to cover. They need permanent relief. That is why we Conservatives are renewing our call for a zero-tax policy on gas. Our strategy is clear and comprehensive. We are formally calling on the government to, first, cancel the excise tax on fuel for the rest of 2026; second, cancel the GST on gas and diesel for the rest of 2026; and third, scrap the clean fuel standard. We are particularly calling for the complete elimination of the clean fuel standard, which is essentially a permanent hidden tax on every litre used. If our plan were fully implemented today, it would result in real, massive and immediate relief—a reduction of up to 25¢ per litre at the pump. For a family of four, that means savings of $20 or more every time they fill up. That is $1,200 in annual savings. That is real money. That is money going directly back into our constituents’ pockets to pay for groceries and rent. Our plan saves 15¢ more per litre than the current Liberal plan. It is irrefutable proof that we are the only ones in the House proposing a solution that is up to the challenge posed by the crisis. We cannot ignore what is happening on the international stage. Canada is becoming an unfortunate and isolated fiscal exception. Leading industrialized nations facing the same global pressures, such as Australia, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Germany and Austria, have already taken concrete steps to slash fuel taxes or offer direct relief at the pump. They have grasped the urgency of the situation. Meanwhile, here, despite the brief partial suspension of excise duties, Canadians continue to pay about 14.7% more than Americans. This injustice drags on because of federal taxes that remain stubbornly high, too high. Should we really be surprised by the Liberals’ inaction in the face of this crisis? After a decade of Liberal waste and mismanagement, Canadians are the ones paying the price. We are talking about massive cost overruns, handsomely paid consultants, not to mention a bloated federal bureaucracy. When will this government stop lining its own pockets and finally give that money back to our communities? The Minister of Finance seems to find this amusing, but I can assure him that, on the ground right now, Canadians and Quebeckers find nothing amusing about the current cost of living. Let us not forget that every wasted dollar gets charged directly to Canada’s credit card. It also gets charged to our children’s and grandchildren’s credit cards, and I want the Minister of Finance to be aware of that. I will have the privilege of becoming a grandfather on November 15, and I hope the Liberal government will demonstrate some fiscal discipline to help future generations and stop charging things to our children’s and grandchildren’s credit cards. Clearly, Canadians can no longer afford this Liberal government. There is a direct connection between the price of diesel and the price of bread on store shelves. Statistics Canada recently reported that Canada has the worst food inflation in the G7. The Prime Minister took office a year ago on a solemn promise to make food more affordable. He failed. Now, a year later, families are paying the price. Thanks to high energy prices, the government is raking in a massive surplus that could be as much as $9 billion. We believe the government has a basic obligation to give that excess revenue back to Canadians in this time of crisis. Our plan would put $5 billion back into the pockets of Canadian families while retaining $4 billion to ensure fiscal flexibility. The Liberals’ decision to hoard the money speaks volumes. After 10 years of this government, who knows where that money will end up? The Conservatives want a different country. We want a compassionate country, where parents never have to feel the pain of choosing between a full grocery basket or a full gas tank to get to work. The House must send a clear signal. It must demand that this government stop settling for half measures, temporary reprieves and optics. The time for a few tweaks here and there is over. We are calling for the outright cancellation of all federal taxes on gas and diesel for the remainder of the year, including the GST, along with the permanent elimination of the clean fuel standard. Now is the time to move from words to action. Now is the time to offer immediate, substantial and measurable relief. Now is the time to put $1,200 back in the pockets of Canadian families, where it will do the most good. The people of this country are not asking for handouts or for more bureaucratic programs. They simply want the government to stop making their financial situation worse. They want less money for the Liberal bureaucracy and more money in their pockets, in their communities. The Conservatives are standing up for affordability. We are standing up to bring relief to every Canadian family and every farmer, and today we are demanding a zero tax on gas.

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“The government is wasting money by leasing land for 20 million dollars that is only worth 13,500 dollars a year. Meanwhile, young people cannot find jobs or homes. I want the Prime Minister to apologize and stop this wasteful spending.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, here is proof of how ridiculous the Liberals are. A company is leasing a piece of land for $13,500 a year and subletting it to the government for $20 million. That is Liberal management. Right now, it is harder for our young people to find a job than it has been for 50 years. They are struggling to find jobs, secure housing and put food on the table. They can no longer dream of owning a home or starting a family. Will the Prime Minister apologize for what he said about our children and stop spending on our children’s credit card?

Oral Questions ·

Aerospace Industry

“The government is wasting money on a space launch pad. A company rents land for $13,500 a year and rents it back to the government for $20 million a year. That will cost taxpayers $200 million over 10 years. I want to know why the government is spending money this way.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, with the Liberals we get higher costs, higher taxes, more spending, and more job losses. The Minister of Finance and National Revenue thinks that the Liberals have done enough. I agree. They have done enough damage. Just look at how they are managing the new Liberal space launch pad. A company is renting land from the provincial government for $13,500 a year. That company then rents it to the Liberal government for $20 million a year, which is $200 million over 10 years on our children’s credit card. The question is simple: If it were your money, what would you do?

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“Factories are closing and taxes hurt local businesses. Savoura pays 2.5 million dollars a year in carbon taxes and green fees, making it hard to compete with Mexican tomatoes. The government should cut rules and taxes instead of making new temporary fixes.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, what a sad state of affairs. Since January, factory closures have been on the rise. On top of losing their jobs, Canadians are footing the Liberal Party’s credit card bill. Savoura pays $2.5 million a year in carbon tax and in Éco Entreprises Québec penalties. These surcharges make it difficult to compete with tomatoes from Mexico, which travel across the entire continent. Instead of creating a new band-aid for businesses, why not streamline the regulations and give our business owners some real breathing room?