Dabrusin defends climate actions, including strengthening the national electricity grid, establishing marine conservation areas, and providing heat pump rebates of up to $10,000 to homeowners. She often makes commitments without dates, measures or named actors, stating, for example, that “We are continuing our efforts to beef up the electrical grid.” She also backs claims with figures, such as emission reductions and program savings.Written by AI from their statements. Updated .
Average grade
B–
The average grade of 41 analysed statements. 2 more were analysed but were too short to grade.
72 / 100 over 41 statements
Signal74 / 100
Relevance58 / 100
Respect100 / 100
Clarity76 / 100
Loses points more than most for A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.3.5 times as often as most members.What the tags mean →×3.5Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.2 times as often as most members.What the tags mean →×2.0Loses points less than most for Thanks and tributes.Less often than most members.What the tags mean →Something stated as certain with nothing to back it.Less often than most members.What the tags mean →
Averaged over the 41 of 43 statements graded so far.
“Last week, the federal government, British Columbia, and six First Nations created a new protected ocean area called Mia-yaltwa. It protects nature in the Great Bear Sea, helps the local economy, and is larger than Prince Edward Island.”
“Mr. Speaker, last week, I was able to go to Klemtu in British Columbia’s beautiful central coast, along with the MP for Vancouver Quadra, where we established Mia-yaltwa. It is a new marine conservation area reserve, the first under our nature strategy. It was established in partnership with six first nations and the Province of British Columbia, along with the federal government, and it is going to be conserving the sister to the Great Bear rainforest in the Great Bear Sea. It is larger than the island of Prince Edward Island. It is a beautiful place where we protect biodiversity, create economic opportunity and advance recognition.”
Official Hansard
Mr. Speaker, last week, I was able to go to Klemtu in British Columbia’s beautiful central coast, along with the MP for Vancouver Quadra, where we established Mia-yaltwa. It is a new marine conservation area reserve, the first under our nature strategy. It was established in partnership with six first nations and the Province of British Columbia, along with the federal government, and it is going to be conserving the sister to the Great Bear rainforest in the Great Bear Sea. It is larger than the island of Prince Edward Island. It is a beautiful place where we protect biodiversity, create economic opportunity and advance recognition.
“Our government is doing a lot to fight climate change. We are cutting methane, improving the power grid, helping other countries fight climate change, and supporting electric cars and clean technology.”
“Mr. Speaker, we are going to talk about lists, since apparently Bloc members like lists: I talked about strengthening methane regulations; I talked about working on the electrical grid. I could talk about what we are doing internationally: We are leaders in international climate finance. If my colleague wants to talk about other things, we could talk about what we are doing for electric vehicles here in Canada. We are doing a lot of work. We are in favour of investments in clean technology. We are fighting climate change and we will keep on fighting.”
Mr. Speaker, we are going to talk about lists, since apparently Bloc members like lists: I talked about strengthening methane regulations; I talked about working on the electrical grid. I could talk about what we are doing internationally: We are leaders in international climate finance. If my colleague wants to talk about other things, we could talk about what we are doing for electric vehicles here in Canada. We are doing a lot of work. We are in favour of investments in clean technology. We are fighting climate change and we will keep on fighting.
“Our government is making progress on cutting pollution. We tightened methane rules to reduce emissions by 400 megatonnes, and we gave Hydro-Québec what it asked for to make its power grid stronger.”
“Mr. Speaker, the Bloc Québécois likes to talk about backtracking, but perhaps we could focus more on the progress we have made. What progress is that? I could talk about the tightening of methane regulations: That alone will reduce emissions by 400 megatonnes. I could talk about what we have done on the electricity front. In fact, we gave Hydro-Québec exactly what it asked for in order to have a stronger and more resilient electricity grid. We are getting the job done and reducing emissions at the same time.”
Mr. Speaker, the Bloc Québécois likes to talk about backtracking, but perhaps we could focus more on the progress we have made. What progress is that? I could talk about the tightening of methane regulations: That alone will reduce emissions by 400 megatonnes. I could talk about what we have done on the electricity front. In fact, we gave Hydro-Québec exactly what it asked for in order to have a stronger and more resilient electricity grid. We are getting the job done and reducing emissions at the same time.
“I am moving amendments to this bill. They make sure parents can keep getting parental leave benefits for at least five weeks if their child dies.”
“propose: Motion No. 1 That Bill C-222 be amended by adding after the heading “Employment Insurance Act” after line 5 on page 1 the following: 1.1 Section 10 of the Employment Insurance Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (13.01): (13.011) If a child referred to in subsection 23(1) dies during the period referred to in subsection 23(2), or any extension of it, the benefit period is extended by the number of weeks that is necessary to give effect to subsection 12(4.02). Motion No. 2 That Bill C-222 be amended by adding after the heading “Employment Insurance Act” after line 5 on page 1 the following: 1.2 Section 12 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (4.01): (4.02) In the case of deemed care under subsection 23(2.1), the applicable maximum number of weeks set out in paragraph (3)(b) or (4)(b) or subsection (4.01) is, if necessary, increased by the number of weeks that allows each claimant to receive at least five weeks of benefits after the death of the child.l’enfant. Motion No. 3 That Bill C-222, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing lines 6 to 21 on page 1 with the following 2 (1) Section 23 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (2): (2.1) If a child referred to in subsection (1) dies during the period referred to in subsection (2), or any extension of it, while benefits under this section are payable to any claimant in respect of that child, the claimant is deemed to care for that child for the purposes of subsection (1) until that period or the extension of it expires. (2.2) If the period referred to in subsection (2), or any extension of it, expires before a claimant referred to in subsection (2.1) has received at least five weeks of benefits after the week in which the child dies, that period or extension of it is extended by the number of weeks that is necessary to ensure that the claimant receives five weeks of benefits. (2) Subsection 23(3.1) of the Act is replaced by the following: (3.1) No extension under subsection (2.2), (3) or (3.01) may result in the period being longer than 104 weeks. Motion No. 4 That Bill C-222 be amended by adding after line 21 on page 1 the following: 2.1 Section 54 of the Act is amended by adding the following after paragraph (y): (y.1) respecting the provision of information to the Commission in relation to subsection 23(2.1) or (2.2) or 152.05(2.1) or (2.2); Motion No. 5 That Bill C-222, in Clause 3, be amended by replacing lines 1 to 16 on page 2 with the following: 3 (1) Section 152.05 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (2): (2.1) If a child referred to in subsection (1) dies during the period referred to in subsection (2), or any extension of it, while benefits under this section are payable to any claimant in respect of that child, the self-employed person is deemed to care for that child for the purposes of subsection (1) until that period or the extension of it expires. (2.2) If the period referred to in subsection (2), or any extension of it, expires before a self-employed person referred to subsection (2.1) has received at least five weeks of benefits after the week in which the child dies, that period or extension of it is extended by the number of weeks that is necessary to ensure that the self-employed person receives five weeks of benefits. (2) Subsection 152.05(4) of the Act is replaced by the following: (4) No extension under subsection (2.2) or (3) may result in the period being longer than 104 weeks. Motion No. 6 That Bill C-222 be amended by adding after line 16 on page 2 the following: 3.1 Subsection 152.11(15) of the Act is replaced by the following: (14.2) If a child referred to in subsection 152.05(1) dies during the period referred to in subsection 152.05(2), or any extension of it, the benefit period is extended by the number of weeks that is necessary to give effect to subsection 152.14(4.1). (15) An extension under one or more of subsections (11) to (14.2) must not result in a benefit period of more than 104 weeks. Motion No. 7 That Bill C-222 be amended by adding after line 16 on page 2 the following: 3.2 Section 152.14 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (4): (4.1) In the case of deemed care under subsection 152.05(2.1), the applicable maximum number of weeks set out in paragraph (1)(b) or (2)(b) or subsection (4) is, if necessary, increased by the number of weeks that allows each claimant to receive at least five weeks of benefits after the death of the child. Motion No. 8 That Bill C-222 be amended by restoring Clause 5 as follows: 5 Section 206.1 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (2): (2.01) For the purposes of subsection (1), if the child dies during the period referred to in subsection (2), the employee is deemed to care for that child until that period expires. Motion No. 9 Que le projet de loi C-222 soit modifié par suppression de l’article 6. Motion No. 10 Que le projet de loi C-222 soit modifié par suppression de l’article 7.”
Official Hansard
propose: Motion No. 1 That Bill C-222 be amended by adding after the heading “Employment Insurance Act” after line 5 on page 1 the following: 1.1 Section 10 of the Employment Insurance Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (13.01): (13.011) If a child referred to in subsection 23(1) dies during the period referred to in subsection 23(2), or any extension of it, the benefit period is extended by the number of weeks that is necessary to give effect to subsection 12(4.02). Motion No. 2 That Bill C-222 be amended by adding after the heading “Employment Insurance Act” after line 5 on page 1 the following: 1.2 Section 12 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (4.01): (4.02) In the case of deemed care under subsection 23(2.1), the applicable maximum number of weeks set out in paragraph (3)(b) or (4)(b) or subsection (4.01) is, if necessary, increased by the number of weeks that allows each claimant to receive at least five weeks of benefits after the death of the child.l’enfant. Motion No. 3 That Bill C-222, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing lines 6 to 21 on page 1 with the following 2 (1) Section 23 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (2): (2.1) If a child referred to in subsection (1) dies during the period referred to in subsection (2), or any extension of it, while benefits under this section are payable to any claimant in respect of that child, the claimant is deemed to care for that child for the purposes of subsection (1) until that period or the extension of it expires. (2.2) If the period referred to in subsection (2), or any extension of it, expires before a claimant referred to in subsection (2.1) has received at least five weeks of benefits after the week in which the child dies, that period or extension of it is extended by the number of weeks that is necessary to ensure that the claimant receives five weeks of benefits. (2) Subsection 23(3.1) of the Act is replaced by the following: (3.1) No extension under subsection (2.2), (3) or (3.01) may result in the period being longer than 104 weeks. Motion No. 4 That Bill C-222 be amended by adding after line 21 on page 1 the following: 2.1 Section 54 of the Act is amended by adding the following after paragraph (y): (y.1) respecting the provision of information to the Commission in relation to subsection 23(2.1) or (2.2) or 152.05(2.1) or (2.2); Motion No. 5 That Bill C-222, in Clause 3, be amended by replacing lines 1 to 16 on page 2 with the following: 3 (1) Section 152.05 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (2): (2.1) If a child referred to in subsection (1) dies during the period referred to in subsection (2), or any extension of it, while benefits under this section are payable to any claimant in respect of that child, the self-employed person is deemed to care for that child for the purposes of subsection (1) until that period or the extension of it expires. (2.2) If the period referred to in subsection (2), or any extension of it, expires before a self-employed person referred to subsection (2.1) has received at least five weeks of benefits after the week in which the child dies, that period or extension of it is extended by the number of weeks that is necessary to ensure that the self-employed person receives five weeks of benefits. (2) Subsection 152.05(4) of the Act is replaced by the following: (4) No extension under subsection (2.2) or (3) may result in the period being longer than 104 weeks. Motion No. 6 That Bill C-222 be amended by adding after line 16 on page 2 the following: 3.1 Subsection 152.11(15) of the Act is replaced by the following: (14.2) If a child referred to in subsection 152.05(1) dies during the period referred to in subsection 152.05(2), or any extension of it, the benefit period is extended by the number of weeks that is necessary to give effect to subsection 152.14(4.1). (15) An extension under one or more of subsections (11) to (14.2) must not result in a benefit period of more than 104 weeks. Motion No. 7 That Bill C-222 be amended by adding after line 16 on page 2 the following: 3.2 Section 152.14 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (4): (4.1) In the case of deemed care under subsection 152.05(2.1), the applicable maximum number of weeks set out in paragraph (1)(b) or (2)(b) or subsection (4) is, if necessary, increased by the number of weeks that allows each claimant to receive at least five weeks of benefits after the death of the child. Motion No. 8 That Bill C-222 be amended by restoring Clause 5 as follows: 5 Section 206.1 of the Act is amended by adding the following after subsection (2): (2.01) For the purposes of subsection (1), if the child dies during the period referred to in subsection (2), the employee is deemed to care for that child until that period expires. Motion No. 9 Que le projet de loi C-222 soit modifié par suppression de l’article 6. Motion No. 10 Que le projet de loi C-222 soit modifié par suppression de l’article 7.
“The Bloc Québécois changed their minds after once supporting oil drilling. Our government is taking real action on climate change, and we are leading the world on this.”
“Mr. Speaker, it is always interesting to get these questions from Bloc Québécois members because of their blatant flip-flopping. Let me remind members again that the leader of the Bloc Québécois was ready to move forward and support oil drilling in Anticosti. Now it seems that Bloc Québécois members are taking a keen interest in the issue. Let us talk about what we are doing on this side of the House. We are still fighting climate change. Our work on methane and our international investments in climate change issues have made us a world leader. We are going to keep doing the work.”
Official Hansard
Mr. Speaker, it is always interesting to get these questions from Bloc Québécois members because of their blatant flip-flopping. Let me remind members again that the leader of the Bloc Québécois was ready to move forward and support oil drilling in Anticosti. Now it seems that Bloc Québécois members are taking a keen interest in the issue. Let us talk about what we are doing on this side of the House. We are still fighting climate change. Our work on methane and our international investments in climate change issues have made us a world leader. We are going to keep doing the work.
“We announced more help today to protect communities from forest fires. Our government is also committed to fighting climate change. We have plans for nature, clean electricity, cleaner cars, and cutting methane emissions.”
“First of all, Mr. Speaker, I would like to reiterate that today we announced further supports in protecting communities from forest fires. I encourage people to look for the resources and the information that is available to them. When it comes to fighting climate change, I want to assure the member opposite that this government and this entire caucus is committed to continuing that fight. We see it with our regulations on enhanced methane, where we are world leaders. We see it with our nature strategy, our electricity strategy and our auto strategy. We are continuing to do the work, and we will get it done.”
Official Hansard
First of all, Mr. Speaker, I would like to reiterate that today we announced further supports in protecting communities from forest fires. I encourage people to look for the resources and the information that is available to them. When it comes to fighting climate change, I want to assure the member opposite that this government and this entire caucus is committed to continuing that fight. We see it with our regulations on enhanced methane, where we are world leaders. We see it with our nature strategy, our electricity strategy and our auto strategy. We are continuing to do the work, and we will get it done.
“All 173 Liberal MPs are working to fight climate change. Our government will keep fighting climate change and protecting the environment.”
“Mr. Speaker, I would love to introduce my colleague to the members of the Liberal environmental caucus who are fighting climate change, as are all 173 members on this side of the House. Our government will continue to fight climate change. We will continue to protect the environment. Our government remains committed to that.”
Mr. Speaker, I would love to introduce my colleague to the members of the Liberal environmental caucus who are fighting climate change, as are all 173 members on this side of the House. Our government will continue to fight climate change. We will continue to protect the environment. Our government remains committed to that.
“The leader of the Bloc Québécois used to support oil drilling and fracking on Anticosti Island. I want to know if the Bloc Québécois has changed its position.”
“Mr. Speaker, I also want to ask the Bloc member a question. It was the leader of the Bloc Québécois who did an about-face when he supported oil drilling and fracking on Anticosti Island, and perhaps the entire party felt the same. Has the Bloc Québécois changed its views? Its leader supported that.”
Mr. Speaker, I also want to ask the Bloc member a question. It was the leader of the Bloc Québécois who did an about-face when he supported oil drilling and fracking on Anticosti Island, and perhaps the entire party felt the same. Has the Bloc Québécois changed its views? Its leader supported that.
“The Liberal government fights climate change every day. We protect nature and the environment, and we will keep doing that because it builds a strong Canada.”
“Mr. Speaker, I would like to assure the House and all Canadians that I and the entire team of people on the Liberal benches fight every day against climate change. We fight for good, strong climate policy that is unifying and pragmatic, and it will work. We are taking action. We are protecting nature. We are protecting the environment. We are going to continue to do that work because we know that is what is best to build a strong Canada.”
Mr. Speaker, I would like to assure the House and all Canadians that I and the entire team of people on the Liberal benches fight every day against climate change. We fight for good, strong climate policy that is unifying and pragmatic, and it will work. We are taking action. We are protecting nature. We are protecting the environment. We are going to continue to do that work because we know that is what is best to build a strong Canada.
“Our team is united in fighting climate change and protecting the environment. Canada already has one of the cleanest electricity systems in the world. We will use tax credits to help provinces like Quebec build even better power grids.”
“Mr. Speaker, I will respond again. We have a team here. The benches are full of members. We are united in building Canada, building it well, protecting the environment and fighting climate change. What we are seeing is that, with the electricity strategy, as I said, we have one of the cleanest electricity grids in the world. When I spoke with Hydro‑Québec, they asked us how we could help them build better electricity grids in the province. That is what we will do through investment tax credits. That is exactly what we need to ensure we continue to fight climate change.”
Mr. Speaker, I will respond again. We have a team here. The benches are full of members. We are united in building Canada, building it well, protecting the environment and fighting climate change. What we are seeing is that, with the electricity strategy, as I said, we have one of the cleanest electricity grids in the world. When I spoke with Hydro‑Québec, they asked us how we could help them build better electricity grids in the province. That is what we will do through investment tax credits. That is exactly what we need to ensure we continue to fight climate change.
“The Bloc Québécois leader allowed oil drilling in the past, so he should not lecture us. Our government is protecting nature, including a huge new area in British Columbia. We also have very clean power and plan to double our electricity supply.”
“Mr. Speaker, I am not going to take lessons from the leader of the Bloc Québécois, who authorized oil drilling on Anticosti Island. If the member wants to talk about the work we are doing here, Canada is a global leader thanks to the work we do. When it comes to protecting nature, we just protected an area in British Columbia that is larger than Prince Edward Island. We are continuing to make progress with our nature strategy. We have one of the cleanest power grids in the world. We plan to double its capacity through our electrification strategy, working with Hydro‑Québec and our other partners. We are getting the job done.”
Mr. Speaker, I am not going to take lessons from the leader of the Bloc Québécois, who authorized oil drilling on Anticosti Island. If the member wants to talk about the work we are doing here, Canada is a global leader thanks to the work we do. When it comes to protecting nature, we just protected an area in British Columbia that is larger than Prince Edward Island. We are continuing to make progress with our nature strategy. We have one of the cleanest power grids in the world. We plan to double its capacity through our electrification strategy, working with Hydro‑Québec and our other partners. We are getting the job done.
“Our government is ready to keep fighting climate change and protecting the environment. Canada is a world leader in this work, and we will continue it.”
“Mr. Speaker, I want to assure my colleague that our benches are full of members who are ready and willing to continue fighting climate change and protecting the environment. Canada is a global leader for its efforts, its nature strategy, its methane regulations and its international climate financing. We are continuing to do the work, and we are doing it as a team.”
Mr. Speaker, I want to assure my colleague that our benches are full of members who are ready and willing to continue fighting climate change and protecting the environment. Canada is a global leader for its efforts, its nature strategy, its methane regulations and its international climate financing. We are continuing to do the work, and we are doing it as a team.
“We worked with six First Nations in British Columbia to protect an area of coastal water bigger than Prince Edward Island. We are working together to protect nature.”
“Mr. Speaker, I appreciate that the member opposite, who is from British Columbia, stood up because it gives me an opportunity to talk about the fact that I just came back from the coastal waters of British Columbia, where we established a national marine conservation area reserve with six first nations in the province of British Columbia. It is going to protect an area larger than the size of Prince Edward Island. This is a chance for us to do good work in partnership, and that is what we are doing. We are protecting the environment, protecting nature and building strong connections with our communities.”
Mr. Speaker, I appreciate that the member opposite, who is from British Columbia, stood up because it gives me an opportunity to talk about the fact that I just came back from the coastal waters of British Columbia, where we established a national marine conservation area reserve with six first nations in the province of British Columbia. It is going to protect an area larger than the size of Prince Edward Island. This is a chance for us to do good work in partnership, and that is what we are doing. We are protecting the environment, protecting nature and building strong connections with our communities.
“Last week, we launched our new electricity plan. It gives tax credits to help provinces connect and improve their power grids. This will help cut emissions and grow our country.”
“Mr. Speaker, if we are going to talk about what I stand for and what I am working on, I will say that last week we launched our electricity strategy. This is something that Hydro‑Québec asked for when it told us that it wanted an investment tax credit. That was a major request, and not only will it help strengthen the domestic electricity grid, but it will also help expand interprovincial interties. That is also what we have done with the Province of Alberta, with the interties that it will have with neighbouring provinces. We will continue to do a great job of cutting emissions and growing our country.”
Mr. Speaker, if we are going to talk about what I stand for and what I am working on, I will say that last week we launched our electricity strategy. This is something that Hydro‑Québec asked for when it told us that it wanted an investment tax credit. That was a major request, and not only will it help strengthen the domestic electricity grid, but it will also help expand interprovincial interties. That is also what we have done with the Province of Alberta, with the interties that it will have with neighbouring provinces. We will continue to do a great job of cutting emissions and growing our country.
“I talked with the environment ministers from Colombia and the Netherlands before the Santa Marta climate conference. I could not go, but our top negotiator did. Canada was one of the few oil-producing countries there. We are still working to fight climate change around the world.”
“Mr. Speaker, I actually had the opportunity to speak with the minister of environment for Colombia and the minister of environment for the Netherlands in advance of the Santa Marta conference. They are the ones who organized it. I was unable to attend because I was here for the spring economic update, but our top negotiator was present for it. We were actually one of the few countries that produces conventional energy that was participating in this conference. We are continuing to be there, to fight climate change and to make sure we have an important role globally.”
Official Hansard
Mr. Speaker, I actually had the opportunity to speak with the minister of environment for Colombia and the minister of environment for the Netherlands in advance of the Santa Marta conference. They are the ones who organized it. I was unable to attend because I was here for the spring economic update, but our top negotiator was present for it. We were actually one of the few countries that produces conventional energy that was participating in this conference. We are continuing to be there, to fight climate change and to make sure we have an important role globally.
“We are spending public money to fight climate change. We are putting billions of dollars into clean energy, a better power grid, and cutting methane emissions.”
“Mr. Speaker, let us talk about what we are doing with public money. We are making major investments in renewable energy. When it comes to electricity and the tax credit, we are investing billions of dollars in a power grid that works well for the whole country. We are also making investments to reduce methane emissions. We are doing the work. We are continuing to fight climate change.”
Mr. Speaker, let us talk about what we are doing with public money. We are making major investments in renewable energy. When it comes to electricity and the tax credit, we are investing billions of dollars in a power grid that works well for the whole country. We are also making investments to reduce methane emissions. We are doing the work. We are continuing to fight climate change.
“We must keep fighting climate change for our economy and for future generations. We tightened methane rules to cut emissions, and we are spending money to protect nature here and help other countries fight climate change.”
“Mr. Speaker, we are very clear. We must continue to fight climate change, from an economic perspective and also from a moral perspective for future generations. We are doing that. As I already said, we strengthened our methane regulations, and that is reducing our greenhouse gas emissions by 400 megatonnes. We are making investments to protect nature while investing abroad to help other countries also fight climate change. We are getting the job done.”
Mr. Speaker, we are very clear. We must continue to fight climate change, from an economic perspective and also from a moral perspective for future generations. We are doing that. As I already said, we strengthened our methane regulations, and that is reducing our greenhouse gas emissions by 400 megatonnes. We are making investments to protect nature while investing abroad to help other countries also fight climate change. We are getting the job done.
“Our government is fighting climate change and protecting the environment. We help pay for climate work around the world, and we are spending money at home to build a cleaner power grid.”
“Mr. Speaker, again, our government is actively committed to fighting climate change and protecting the environment. Internationally, we are a global leader in financing international climate action. Domestically, we are investing in a critical power grid as we move toward a carbon-free future. We are doing the work while he is complaining. We will continue to fight climate change.”
Mr. Speaker, again, our government is actively committed to fighting climate change and protecting the environment. Internationally, we are a global leader in financing international climate action. Domestically, we are investing in a critical power grid as we move toward a carbon-free future. We are doing the work while he is complaining. We will continue to fight climate change.
“Our government is fighting climate change, and we will keep doing it. We are cutting pollution while creating jobs building cars. Our rules on methane will also cut greenhouse gas emissions by 400 megatonnes.”
“Mr. Speaker, I want to assure the House that this government is committed to fighting climate change. We are getting the job done and we will stay the course. Just look at our auto strategy. We are going to reduce greenhouse gases while creating jobs and building cars. Just look at what we are doing to protect nature. We have methane regulations, which are going to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions by 400 megatonnes. We are getting the job done and we will keep going.”
Mr. Speaker, I want to assure the House that this government is committed to fighting climate change. We are getting the job done and we will stay the course. Just look at our auto strategy. We are going to reduce greenhouse gases while creating jobs and building cars. Just look at what we are doing to protect nature. We have methane regulations, which are going to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions by 400 megatonnes. We are getting the job done and we will keep going.
“Our government is working to fight climate change and protect the environment. We have plans to protect nature and new rules on methane that other countries admire. I want other members of Parliament to support our work.”
“Mr. Speaker, I must say this again, as I do every time: Our government is committed to continuing the fight against climate change and to protecting the environment. We have a nature strategy. It is a major investment in our country’s future. We have introduced methane regulations. This is something that people in other countries are looking at and admiring; they are saying that Canada is ahead of the curve and is a leader. We will continue doing our job. I hope our colleagues will look at this and support us.”
Mr. Speaker, I must say this again, as I do every time: Our government is committed to continuing the fight against climate change and to protecting the environment. We have a nature strategy. It is a major investment in our country’s future. We have introduced methane regulations. This is something that people in other countries are looking at and admiring; they are saying that Canada is ahead of the curve and is a leader. We will continue doing our job. I hope our colleagues will look at this and support us.
