MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Lena Metlege Diab

Follow by RSS

Metlege Diab oversees the Ministry of Immigration, defending policies that reduce temporary resident levels and advancing legislation like Bill C-3 to grant citizenship to children of Canadians born abroad. Her arguments often lean on broad commitments, as she states, “We are focusing on maintaining balance and control over our immigration system.” She backs these claims with figures regarding population declines and deportation numbers.Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
B
77 / 100 over 127 statements
Signal 77 / 100
Relevance 66 / 100
Respect 100 / 100
Clarity 85 / 100
Loses points more than most for A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.2.3 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×2.3 Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.2.2 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×2.2 Wording that hides who did something, or who will.2.2 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×2.2 Loses points less than most for Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.Less often than most members.What the tags mean Averaged over the 127 of 269 statements graded so far.

Statements 269

Government Orders ·

Business of Supply

In response to a question from Kevin Lamoureux

“Things were very different when I became a provincial minister in 2013.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 22 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, I want to thank my hon. colleague for his passion but also for his experience and for bringing us back to 2014. Again, as I said, I became minister provincially in 2013. The times were very, very different back—

In response to a question from Gabriel Hardy

“Our plan to control immigration is working. We cut immigration spending by 15 percent because fewer temporary residents, students, and asylum seekers are coming to Canada. Our budget keeps the system secure, stops fraud, and focuses on bringing in skilled workers we need, like doctors.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, I am very pleased to be here this evening. I welcome the opportunity to highlight how the government is investing, through the main estimates, to support a strong and sustainable immigration system. Canadian communities benefit from immigration, and Canada also benefits from the talent that our system attracts from around the world. Immigration supports our economy. It helps our communities grow, reunites families, addresses labour needs in key sectors and reflects our long-standing commitment to protecting people fleeing violence, persecution and forced displacement. To achieve this, for immigration to continue to work for Canada, it must be well managed, which means a system Canadians can trust that is controlled, sustainable, fair and secure. That is the work that we have been doing, and the results are clear. Permanent resident admissions are stabilized at less than 1% of Canada’s population beyond 2027. The temporary resident population is on track to fall below 5% of Canada’s population by the end of 2027, a target that the Parliamentary Budget Officer has independently projected Canada is on track to meet. Temporary resident arrivals are already down significantly. They are down 75% between January and March of this year compared to the same period in 2024, which includes international students. New arrivals were down 79% over the same period following measures such as the annual cap, stronger verification of letters of acceptance, higher financial requirements and the end of the student direct stream. We are making more deliberate choices on temporary workers, with new worker arrivals down 74% over the same period and pathways better targeted to high-skill and high-demand jobs, including through limits on low-wage hiring, reforms to the post-graduation work permit program and pathways for select skilled workers already contributing in Canada. Asylum claims have also dropped. Between January and March of this year, 59% fewer people submitted a claim compared to the same period in 2024. This reflects stronger front-end screening, enhanced tools to detect fraud, reforms to the international student and temporary worker programs and the passing of Bill C-12, the Strengthening Canada’s Immigration System and Borders Act. These are not isolated measures; they are part of a clear plan to bring immigration back to a sustainable path, lessen pressures on our communities and keep the system focused on Canada’s needs. Canadians can trust that the plan is working. This work continues under the 2026‑2028 immigration levels plan and our main estimates. Together, they demonstrate that the government’s immigration plan and its fiscal plan are aligned, with lower levels, strengthened integrity and funding allocated to where it will have the greatest impact. For fiscal year 2026‑27, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada’s main estimates total $4.42 billion, a decrease of 15% from the previous year. These main estimates reflect a disciplined approach to immigration spending. They align resources with lower immigration levels, the phasing out of temporary measures and the government’s broader commitment to reduce spending, improve productivity, and focus on core priorities. Fiscal discipline does not mean stepping away from the department’s core responsibilities. These estimates continue to fund the essential work of managing migration, supporting newcomers, strengthening system integrity and improving service. They also support the planning and partnership that keep immigration organized and sustainable, including the implementation of Canada’s multi-year immigration level plan and the Canada–Québec Accord. They include limited temporary health care coverage to eligible people and help for provinces and municipalities responding to temporary housing pressures linked to asylum claims. These supports help Canada meet its humanitarian obligations, support partners on the ground and help newcomers settle, contribute and reach their full potential in Canada. They help maintain the asylum system in Canada, including work to strengthen system integrity and maintain processing capacity. They improve service through modernized digital tools. The lower funding profile reflects our responsible approach, reducing where volumes are lower, where temporary measures are ending and where programs can be delivered more efficiently. At the same time, this budget maintains targeted support where the system needs capacity, stability and integrity. That includes support for the asylum system, for protected persons who are already in Canada and are in the process of acquiring permanent residency and for workers who are already here and already contributing, who can help meet labour market needs in communities across the country. Integrity is crucial to fairness. A fair system protects genuine applicants, prevents fraud and misrepresentation and includes rigorous screening, identity verification and secure processing. That is why my department is strengthening the integrity of the asylum system, improving compliance, using biometrics and modernizing the tools officers need. A secure, sustainable system also needs modern services. Let me turn to Canada’s leadership in a changing world. Migration has always been part of the human story. People move to build safer lives, to find opportunity, to reunite with family and to contribute to something larger than themselves. Around the world, migration systems are under pressure. Countries are facing the same challenge of how to respond to movement that is more complex while keeping confidence in the systems that manage it. When I was at the United Nations earlier this month, it was clear that partners are looking to Canada because we are choosing a responsible path. We are protecting the value of immigration by making the system more controlled, more sustainable and more focused on the people and skills that Canada needs. That is how we keep immigration as a strength. That is the system we are building: lower volume, higher integrity, more targeted choices and a clear focus on Canada’s capacity and economic needs. That does not mean we are straying from our priorities and values. It means we are focusing immigration where it can have the greatest impact. Canada will continue to attract qualified workers and top talent in sectors that matter to our economy, such as health care, construction and emerging industries. That includes physicians already here and contributing to our health care system. Through the measure I announced in December, 391 physicians have already been invited to apply for permanent residency. These are people in Canada already. We will continue working with provinces, territories and partners to respond to labour market needs, and we will continue to uphold Canada’s humanitarian tradition while building a system that can endure. These are main estimates that work. We need a system that is controlled, sustainable, fair, secure, fiscally responsible and focused on keeping immigration working for Canada. That is the system Canadians expect. That is the system we are delivering.

In response to a question from Gabriel Hardy

“I am working hard to support the French language and French-speaking communities across Canada, including in Quebec.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, I am working very hard for the French language and for francophone communities across Canada, and therefore in Quebec as well. This is something that I care deeply about.

In response to a question from Gabriel Hardy

“The department is working hard to process all claims.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 49 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, the department is working very hard to process all claims. I can tell him that between now and the end—

In response to a question from Gabriel Hardy

“We worked very hard on this bill and made changes.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, we worked very hard. There was Bill C-12, and we also made changes with things—

In response to a question from Gabriel Hardy

“We recognize Quebec's work to welcome asylum seekers. We have cut the number of asylum seekers by 71 percent.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, first of all, we recognize Quebec’s role in welcoming asylum seekers. The good news is that we have reduced the number by 71% compared to—

In response to a question from Gabriel Hardy

“Our agreement with Quebec lets the province choose all of its own immigrants. We respect that.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 49 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, the Canada-Quebec accord addresses these issues. As Minister of Immigration, I believe the agreement allows Quebec to select all of its immigrants, and we respect that.

In response to a question from Gabriel Hardy

“This issue is the responsibility of the provinces. Even so, the federal government is working closely with Quebec on it.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 48 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Reply to a debate question

    Clarity 47 of 100

    Much of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, this matter falls under provincial jurisdiction. At the federal level, as I said, we are working closely with the Province of Quebec, with the Quebec minister, and with the members here.

In response to a question from Gabriel Hardy

“I did not hear the whole question. But we are working with Quebec to protect its interests.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 49 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, unfortunately, I did not quite hear the question. However, I can tell the member that we are working with the province of Quebec and with the members of the House who represent Quebec to maintain—

In response to a question from Gabriel Hardy

“We are following our agreement with Quebec. We are working closely with the province and its immigration minister.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, I very much appreciate that question. Absolutely, we are honouring the accord. Absolutely, we are working very hard with the Province of Quebec and its immigration minister.

In response to a question from Brad Redekopp

“Anyone can say they are related to a Canadian citizen. But they must prove their family connection at every step.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 49 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, anybody can claim anything. However, there is a requirement that proof of ancestry at every chain must be established.

In response to a question from Brad Redekopp

“Our bill makes sure that people cannot pass down Canadian citizenship to children born outside Canada forever. It sets clear, controlled rules for who can inherit citizenship.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 48 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, again, what we did in this piece of legislation was ensure that citizenship by descent cannot be passed on indefinitely. We have provided clarity, we have provided structure, and we have provided control to citizenship by descent.

In response to a question from Brad Redekopp

“The Conservatives disagree, but our bill protects the value of Canadian citizenship.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, I think the Conservatives have a real problem with this. I just want to say that the government has acted to protect the value of citizenship by passing this piece of legislation and ensuring that people value our citizenship and our Canadian—

In response to a question from Brad Redekopp

“Iran's Revolutionary Guard officials are banned from Canada. Border officers work hard to kick them out, and we are giving police and border officers more money to do this.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, I am going to say it one more time: IRGC officials are inadmissible to Canada. There is a ban in place. CBSA works forcefully to remove them, and we are investing in our policing and our officers to do exactly that.

In response to a question from Brad Redekopp

“Members of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps are not allowed into Canada. Our government banned them, and that ban is still in place.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 49 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, IRGC officials, as we have said, are inadmissible to Canada. It was the Liberal government that put that ban in place, and it continues to be there.

In response to a question from Brad Redekopp

“Canada has cancelled 239 visas and border officers have carried out 176 investigations.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, there have been 239 visas cancelled by IRCC and 176 investigations by the CBSA.

In response to a question from Brad Redekopp

“Members of Iran's Revolutionary Guard are banned from coming to Canada. That ban is still in place.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 49 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, as we have said, IRGC officials are inadmissible to Canada. The government has put a ban on them, and that ban continues to be in place.

In response to a question from Brad Redekopp

“We made stricter rules and added penalties for all our consultants.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 49 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, let me go back to the member’s other question for a moment. We have tightened all kinds of rules and restrictions and have made penalties for all our consultants.

In response to a question from Brad Redekopp

“The Auditor General found that ending the fast-track student visa program was the right choice. Ending it stopped a lot of bad behavior.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 49 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, the Auditor General found that the cancellation of the student direct stream in 2024 was the right path to take. That has curbed all kinds of misconduct.

In response to a question from Brad Redekopp

“The Auditor General's report confirmed that many actions taken by the immigration department worked very well.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 49 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, in fact we spent standing committee meetings on the Auditor General’s report, which actually confirmed that a number of the actions that the IRCC department has taken were very effective.