MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Melissa Lantsman

Follow by RSS

Lantsman presses for lower living costs, pushing the government to scrap the clean fuel standard and GST on fuel, find $150 billion in savings she identifies, and cut taxes on homes and gasoline, while demanding answers on antisemitism, IRGC visas and immigration fraud, and sponsoring a bill to force platforms to block online fraud. She argues with numbers and hard either-or choices—“It is a very simple yes or no”—pressing ministers to answer directly.Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
A–
87 / 100 over 96 statements
Signal 73 / 100
Relevance 81 / 100
Respect 100 / 100
Clarity 96 / 100
The usual mix, except that they lose points less than most for Thanks and tributes.Less often than most members.What the tags mean A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.Less often than most members.What the tags mean Averaged over the 96 of 108 statements graded so far.

Statements 108

Government Orders ·

An Act to Authorize Certain Payments to be Made out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund

In response to a question from Sébastien Lemire

“Past money sent to the provinces did not build more homes or lower prices. The government still cannot tell us how many homes this 1.7 billion dollars will build. Does my colleague know how many homes this bill will actually build?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the story is the same, same and not different with this bill and all of the other money that has flowed through provinces where housing starts did not increase and the price has not gone down. In fact, it has gone up. Earlier today, we asked the Minister of Housing how many houses the $1.7 billion would build. We even asked the parliamentary secretary, who had a slightly better answer than the minister, but there is still no answer at all about how many houses the $1.7 billion of taxpayers’ money would build. I ask my hon. colleague if he knows how many houses the $1.7 billion the House is being asked to approve right now will build.

Government Orders ·

Government Business No. 11—Proceedings on Bill C-26

“We should keep debating this bill. The minister has not answered how many homes his 1.7-billion-dollar plan will actually build.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we have heard a lot about process from the minister and in the House as to why this bill should be closed for debate. However, what we and the industry have not heard from the minister is how many homes the $1.7 billion that he wants to spend of taxpayer dollars is going to build. He has not answered that question, which is why we should continue to debate this.

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“Canadians are going hungry and seniors cannot afford homes. The government will not answer questions about this. When will the government change the bad policies that caused these problems?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, for the last 45 minutes, Canadians watching at home have known that this is not answer period. The Liberals do not have a single answer, and the ministers are out of their depth. Some are reading off their cellphones, and the President of the Treasury Board is still flipping through his binder, looking for an answer to the question. This is serious. Canadians at home are going hungry. Seniors are living on the side of the highway because they cannot afford a home. When will the government reverse its disastrous policies that got us here in the first place?

Oral Questions ·

Public Safety

“A second police officer was killed this week while investigating shootings, including an attack on the U.S. consulate. What is the government doing to help the investigation and keep Canadians safe?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we know, indeed, that it is a difficult time. We know that this is the second officer killed in the line of duty this week. That number is too high. Constable Pinizzotto was executing a warrant linked to several shootings, including one targeting the U.S. consulate in Toronto. With an attack on a diplomatic mission on Canadian soil, a police officer now dead and a suspect at large, can the minister please tell the House whether security agencies are engaged and what the government is specifically doing to support the investigation and keep Canadians from coast to coast safe?

“A Toronto police officer was shot and killed on the job today. I want the Minister of Public Safety to tell the House what the government is doing about it.”
  • Opposition question in Question Period

    Signal 39 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, this morning, I am sure every member of this House was devastated to learn of the Toronto police officer who was shot and killed in the line of duty. We grieve alongside the family, friends and colleagues of Constable Marc Pinizzotto, an 18-year veteran of the force who served his city with courage and devotion until his very final moments. To his loved ones and the men and women in uniform right across this country who put their lives on the line every single day, our gratitude is beyond measure. In the wake of this tragic loss, will the Minister of Public Safety please update the House on the government’s response?

Oral Questions ·

Public Safety

“The government let people connected to Iran's military into Canada and is reviewing thousands of visas. I want the minister to tell us how many of these people are here and if more than one has been deported.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, those ministers must know that if someone is inadmissible, they are not allowed into the country. The Minister of Immigration admitted to the House that her government let people with ties to the IRGC into this country and she admitted that thousands of visas have been or needed to be reviewed since the beginning of this year, but she will not admit how many people with ties to the IRGC are actually here. Can the minister stand up now, from her seat, and finally tell the House if more than one IRGC agent has been deported from this country?

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“The Prime Minister spends far too much public money on himself, his flights, and his office. When Canadian families are hurting because of the economy, he should cut his own spending.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, earlier today, the Liberals actually compared the salaries and offices and the economy-class flights of the Leader of the Opposition to the Prime Minister’s $835 on orange juice on one trip or the $3,800 he spent on chocolate mousse on a flight. That is on top of the $250 million he spends on his personal office. That is 30 times more than the Leader of the Opposition. While families are forced to tighten their belts because he is the only leader in the G20 that plunged us into a recession, should he not tighten his own?

Oral Questions ·

Public Safety

“Canadians do not feel safe, and the government has no real plan to stop violence and threats against Jewish people. I want the Prime Minister to take real action.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, that minister should ask anyone in Canada, or even the hundred Liberal donors who were in that room last night, if they feel safer today. The answer is no, because what we heard yesterday was hollow. It was reviewing previous reviews and studying studies on a crisis that the government presided over, funded and fuelled. That is not a plan. Nothing he said will stop the bullets from entering the member’s own synagogue or the genocidal slogans that are uttered in the streets every single day against Canadians. Will the Prime Minister finally stand up in the House and meet the moment he so spectacularly failed—

“The Prime Minister gave a weak speech about treating Jewish people badly. His new council to fix the problem includes people who defended illegal encampments, supported terrorist groups, and gave government money to people who hate Jews. Jewish Canadians are being attacked, yet the government put the people who made the problem worse in charge. I want to know if the Prime Minister is serious.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, yesterday, the Prime Minister delivered a speech on anti-Semitism so neutered that an anti-Semite would have given it a standing ovation. His solution was a council that includes a lawyer who went to court defending illegal encampments and a former minister whose organization lost federal funding for supporting Hamas and Hezbollah and who then lobbied the former government to keep them off the terror list. The council is led now by a minister who wants to ban passages from the Bible and funded these same anti-Semites in his own department. Jewish Canadians are being attacked on the streets, and the Liberals are giving the keys to the very people that fuelled the crisis. I have one question for the Prime Minister: Is he serious?

Statements by Members ·

Shomrim Toronto

“I want the House to recognize Shomrim Toronto. They are a volunteer safety group that worked with police and neighbours to find a missing young girl safely.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, today I rise to recognize an extraordinary demonstration of community strength right here in Canada. When a young girl went missing in north Toronto, Shomrim Toronto, a volunteer community safety and security organization, mobilized immediately. Shomrim coordinated its members alongside local law enforcement, community organizations and thousands of residents who answered the call without hesitation. They were strangers who dropped everything to help. The young girl was found safe, and we send our deepest thanks to everyone who helped. What unfolded over those first critical hours, days and weeks is a testament to their professionalism and compassion. They are ordinary people working around the clock for days and weeks. That is a testament to their professionalism. It is not just a supplement to public safety, but an essential pillar of it, and we should recognize that. Shomrim Toronto deserves the full recognition of the House. This year, it will receive a community heroes award. Those who know Shomrim’s value understand it is as sacred as the life and universe it helped save this time and every time before it.

Oral Questions ·

Public Safety

“We already have laws, and this bill will not stop the violence on our streets. The Prime Minister is doing nothing while synagogues are attacked and hate continues. I want to know what it will take for the government to finally act.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we all know the laws exist. The member opposite knows full well that Bill C-9 and anything he mentioned would not have stopped a single thing that happened in the streets. We already know the Prime Minister will not act because he has not acted. In fact, he did not say a thing last week. More effigies will be hung, more firebombs will be thrown into synagogues and more Liberal MPs will pose for pictures with those who glorify terrorism. The question is not whether the government will finally call this a crisis. We know they will not. The question is how much more needs to happen in order for anybody to do anything.

“The government ignored people treating Jewish people badly, and now it is out of control. In just one week, people hung effigies of Jews, called for an end to Canada's Jewish community, and tore down posters of a missing Jewish girl. I want the government to admit this is a crisis.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Liberal government spent years ignoring and enabling anti-Semitism in Canada. We are now watching the consequences unfold in real time. In a single week in the country, effigies of Jews were hung in Montreal in the streets, while genocidal slogans were chanted. Government-funded organizations openly discussed a Jew-free Canada. Posters of a missing 14-year-old girl were torn down because she was Jewish. That is in just one week in Canada. Will any member on that side of the House get up and admit that we are in a full-blown crisis?

Government Orders ·

Business of Supply

“Many of these people are still in Canada. I want the minister to tell me the number. Ask your officials sitting in front of you.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, many of them are still in Canada. I am asking for just a number, minister. You must know this. Your officials are sitting in front of you. Ask them.

“How many Iranian Revolutionary Guard agents are still in Canada? The minister admitted they are here, so I want her to tell us if there are more or less than 700.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, how many IRGC agents are still in the country? The minister has admitted it, so she can give us a number. Is it more or less than 700?

“I want the minister to give me a yes or no answer. Is the department now checking the thousands of people who did not get security checks?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, I want the minister to answer this question: If the security checks were not done for thousands who were reviewed by the department, is it now reviewing those, yes or no? It is a very simple yes or no.

In response to a question from Lena Metlege Diab

“I want the minister to stop reading talking points and answer my question. Is her department reviewing people who did not get security checks?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, I would ask the minister to stop reading the talking points and just answer the question. Her department is now reviewing those who did not have security checks, is that true or not true, for everybody listening from that community?

In response to a question from Lena Metlege Diab

“The department is reviewing thousands of visas given to people from Iran because it suspects security checks were not done. Can the minister confirm if this is true?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, they got into Canada, and it made headlines. The department has now been reviewing thousands of previously granted visas to non-citizens from Iran because it suspects the security checks were not done before they entered Canada. Can the minister confirm whether that is correct?

In response to a question from Lena Metlege Diab

“The minister's department let an Iranian official into Canada. I want the minister to give a yes or no answer on whether she thinks that was okay.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, for all of those who are watching at home, who have been terrorized by IRGC officials who are still here, one of whom has been deported, this man, a FIFA official, was allowed to come to Canada because somebody in her department allowed him to. I have asked the minister a simple question. Is she satisfied with that outcome, yes or no, for everybody watching at home?

In response to a question from Lena Metlege Diab

“The minister admitted this man should not have been allowed in, but someone in her department let him in anyway. I want her to answer yes or no: is she satisfied with how this was handled?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, the minister just stated that, by her own rules, this man was inadmissible. Somebody in her department overruled that. Is she satisfied with how this was handled, yes or no?

In response to a question from Lena Metlege Diab

“The minister did not answer my question, so I am asking again. Why did she or her department give a visa to FIFA official Mehdi Taj so he could come to Canada?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, the minister did not answer the question, so I am going to ask her one more time. Why was Mehdi Taj, the FIFA official, to whom she granted, or her department granted, a visa, allowed to come to Canada? It is a very simple question.