MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Scot Davidson

Follow by RSS

Davidson presses the government on affordability and jobs in York—South Simcoe, asking for emergency diesel price relief, natural gas lines and hydro for local businesses, and action to save aluminum and auto jobs. He argues by leaping from one example to a sweeping verdict, as when a constituent watching her children struggle shows an entire generation’s promise “slip further out of reach”. He often presses for a plain yes-or-no answer, as in “Is there an affordability crisis in Canada, yes or no?”Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
B+
81 / 100 over 38 statements
Signal 70 / 100
Relevance 61 / 100
Respect 99 / 100
Clarity 97 / 100
Loses points more than most for A remark off to the side of the point.1.8 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×1.8 Loses points less than most for Thanks and tributes.Less often than most members.What the tags mean A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.Less often than most members.What the tags mean Averaged over the 38 of 41 statements graded so far.

Statements 41

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“Liberal policies caused a recession and made groceries unaffordable. The Prime Minister should come home from Paris to face the 2.2 million Canadians using food banks.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, is that member picking up what I am laying down? That strategy will not feed a single Canadian who cannot afford groceries today because of Liberal policies that have put us in a recession. Maybe the Prime Minister would know this if he was not so eager to flee the country and the people his policies are hurting the most. Instead of champagne wishes and caviar dreams in Paris, why does the Prime Minister not come home and face the 2.2 million Canadians lined up at the food banks?

“The Prime Minister spent nearly $1 million on luxury food on his flights last year while many Canadians cannot afford to eat. I want to know when he will stop wasting public money.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, there we go again. While one in five Canadians goes hungry, the Prime Minister is somewhere over the Atlantic tucking into another three‑course meal on the taxpayers’ dime. In the last year, he spent nearly $1 million on luxury inflight catering, and now he is on another trip, leaving behind countless Canadians wondering how they will afford their next meal. When will this high-flying, fine-dining Prime Minister stop wasting taxpayer dollars so Canadians can eat again?

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“Life costs too much, and people are struggling just to get by after years of Liberal economic choices. I want the Prime Minister to admit his policies are hurting Canadians.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the cost of living is so high that living is being put on hold. This is the real Liberal recession, where people cannot afford to enjoy life, make memories or chase dreams. They are spending their whole time just barely getting by. Those are the consequences of 11 years of Liberals and their failed economic policy. Instead of telling people who are struggling that everything is fine, will the Prime Minister stand up and admit his real Liberal recession is hurting Canadians?

“Canada is the only G20 country in a recession. The Prime Minister's policies help rich people while working Canadians struggle to afford food, housing, and jobs. Why is he pretending people are not actually suffering?”
  • A repeated line

    “Canada is the only G20 country in a recession.”

    Said 104 times by 61 members since May 29.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, under this Liberal Prime Minister, Canada is the only G20 country to fall into recession. This so-called financial wizard created a K-shaped economy where the wealthy, the bankers and the bondholders climb higher, while working Canadians fall further behind. The Liberals can say, “What recession?” because they are not impacted by skyrocketing unemployment, grocery bills and mortgages. Why is this Prime Minister telling Canadians that they are just technically unemployed, technically hungry or technically homeless?

Statements by Members ·

Government Priorities

“The government is wasting billions of tax dollars on foreign aid, insiders, and bad programs while Canadians struggle to afford food and housing. When will the Prime Minister start putting Canadians first?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Canadians are finding themselves on the outside looking in. The Liberal government is wasting insane amounts of money and driving up inflation while our citizens cannot afford to eat or house themselves. It is enough to blow the hat right off one’s head. It has spent $300 million on the PrescribeIT scandal, $800 million on their gun buyback program, $12 billion on foreign aid, $19 billion on government insiders, $1 billion on health care for fake refugees and $200 million on a concrete launch pad. It is like something right out of Spaceballs. Canadians are right to be angry. They are being forced into food banks, living on the streets and waiting years for basic medical procedures while the Liberals keep on wasting taxpayer dollars. Why is it that our people are always at the back of the line in their own country? When will the Prime Minister start putting Canadians first?

Government Orders ·

Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act

In response to a question from Elizabeth May

“The government broke its promise to build a vaccine factory in Quebec. It wasted $300 million of our money.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 35 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we are all concerned about the promises the government makes. It is all pie in the sky. We spent $300 million. We were supposed to have a factory that actually created vaccines for Canadians in Quebec. Where is that factory now? Where is the $300 million? That is what Canadians call waste.

In response to a question from Mario Beaulieu

“The government claims the carbon tax and their wealth fund do not hurt prices or costs. If their ideas work as well as they claim, they should put way more money into them.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 32 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, as in my opening, I am always proud to represent the soup and salad bowl of Canada. Again, going back to the Liberal government with the industrial carbon tax, the Liberals sit there and say that the industrial carbon tax does not affect the price of anything and that it is actually good for prices. I go back to what I said about the wealth fund. If raising the industrial carbon tax does not affect anything, why only raise it to $170? They should put it up to $400. It does not affect anything. It is the same with the wealth fund. Why $25 billion? If the returns are so good, why not put $500 billion in it and get it going?

In response to a question from Tamara Jansen

“People and small businesses in my riding are broke and struggling. We need local infrastructure like gas lines and electricity, but the government is sending money overseas instead.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my colleague is right. Canadians are flat broke. I spent time in the riding over these last two weeks. I could not believe the stories people and small business owners were telling me. As an aside, and I have spoken about this a number of times, we have been waiting 10 years for natural gas lines in my riding and for phase three hydro so small businesses can start. People are coming to me, frustrated, asking, “Why are we sending all this money overseas? Why am I on the outside looking in when all I am trying to do is just get ahead?”

In response to a question from Kevin Lamoureux

“The government is out of touch. It is using borrowed money to pay for this new fund. The Liberals also wrongly claim that the industrial carbon tax does not raise prices.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Respect 77 of 100

    This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “my hon. colleague from Winnipeg North has had too much Kool-Aid today”.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I think my hon. colleague from Winnipeg North has had too much Kool-Aid today. That is a government that is out of touch. This so-called sovereign wealth fund is financed with debt. The government does not understand the way things work. The Liberals talk about imaginary taxes all the time. They say the industrial carbon tax does not drive up the price of things. That is how upside down the Liberals are.

In response to a question from Martin Champoux

“I oppose this budget update. The government is spending too much money and adding billions to the national debt. People in my riding are struggling to afford food and rent, and seniors are being forced back to work.”
  • A repeated line

    “After 11 years of the Liberal government.”

    Said 25 times by 19 members since April 30.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is always an honour to rise on behalf of the soup and salad bowl of Canada, home to Honda Civic and the best potatoes this side of P.E.I. In the spring economic update, and throughout this debate, the Liberals have made it apparent that they believe Canadians have never had it so good. The Minister of Finance even introduced this update by telling us, “the dream of Canada is alive and well.” I think we need a reality check. Let me share what is happening in my community, because it tells a very different story. Last week, my son came back from running a booth at a local job fair. He came back upset and shocked. He told me he saw hundreds of people lined up, résumés in hand, hoping for a chance to work for one of the few employers in the area still hiring. That was not the shocking part, given that the unemployment rate is now almost 7% across the country. What was shocking to him was the number of seniors in those lines. I am lucky. My son is an old soul. He does not come to me often, but he was very upset. He told me how sad it was to see elderly men in dated suits that had not been worn in years, helped along by wives for whom just standing in that line was an immense effort. Those couples were not there out of choice or ambition. Those people had already worked their whole lives, earned for their retirement and assumed that this chapter was behind them, but now they are pushed back into the workforce because the cost of everything has risen so far and so fast. Unfortunately, very few will manage to get a job at all. It is not just them: All generations are struggling, right across the country. Young people have given up on owning a home. Families are choosing between groceries and rent. It is infuriating that this is the reality facing our people today. This is the new normal in Canada, after 11 years of the Liberal government. Canadians are being asked to accept what used to be unacceptable: crowded emergency rooms, no doctors, two million people lined up for blocks around food banks, and rampant crime and homelessness in our streets. We see it every day. Now even our proud Snowbirds, a symbol of Canadian excellence for generations, are being grounded for years and replaced with inferior aircraft that do not come close to what we have today. In every corner of Canadian life, the message from the government is the same: “Lower your expectations.” Instead of aspiring to build a better Canada and restoring the fiscal responsibility this country sorely needs, the spring economic update confirms that the Liberals are spending money they do not have and charging the bill to Canadians who can least afford it. The Prime Minister promised to spend less than Justin Trudeau, but under his leadership, direct program spending has increased 12.4%, and the deficit has doubled from $31 billion to $65 billion. Their own projections in this update show the national debt reaching $1.63 trillion by 2031. Every dollar of that debt comes with a price tag. This year alone, the price is $58.7 billion in interest payments. That is more than the federal government collects on GST and more than it transfers to the provinces through the Canada health transfer. That is $3,400 from every Canadian family: not for hospitals, not for highways, not for any of the people in that job fair line, just for the interest alone. This level of overspending is indefensible, given the windfall of tax revenue the government has collected through higher-than-expected oil prices over the past year. What did they do with this windfall? They spent 80¢ of every new dollar. They fell short of their own promised savings in operating expenditures by $30 billion. The debt-to-GDP ratio, the government’s own preferred measure of fiscal health, will continue rising until 2030. Instead of returning that good fortune to Canadians through lower taxes or applying it against the deficit, the government used it as a licence to spend even more. We see this with the so-called Canada Strong fund. There is another slogan. The Liberal government cannot even manage its own finances, but now it wants to leverage Canadians’ own money towards projects underwritten by even more debt. The key to a sovereign wealth fund is wealth, after all. After 11 years of the Liberal government, Canada has none. Our country is poorer due to Liberal policies that have blocked economic growth, fuelled inflation and increased our national debt to record levels. Now, just as they did with the failed Canada Infrastructure Bank, the Liberals claim that this $25-billion fund will attract investment that it would not otherwise attract. This begs the question that I have asked so many times in this chamber: If this fund is so great and will produce such an amazing return on that investment, why would we stop at $25 billion? Put in $100 billion. Why not put in $250 billion? After all, according to the government, it is just a capital investment. It is basically free. Well, we all know the answer to that, because at some point even the Liberal government has to own up to the fact that incurring massive amounts of debt is not an investment strategy. It is a liability, and $25 billion of it deployed into projects of the government’s choosing is not a true wealth fund; it is a gamble, and Canadians are being asked to cover that bet. This is a recurring theme with the Liberal government’s approach to the economy. It is always our people who have to suffer the consequences of this Prime Minister’s economic and trade failures, and right now they are struggling in record numbers. New insolvency data shows that over 37,000 Canadians filed for insolvency in the first quarter of 2026, the highest level since the great recession. Our people are carrying $2.6 trillion in household debt, while mortgage delinquency has reached its highest level in five years. With this spring economic update, the Liberals are adding more debt, more costs and more taxes on the backs of Canadians, who are already at the breaking point. Even worse, all this is taking place while Canada is still without a trade agreement with the United States. The uncertainty, tariffs and job losses that flow from that into auto manufacturing, into agriculture and right across the economy have more of an impact than anything announced in this update. The Liberals are failing on both fronts: They have not lowered the debt, increased investment or unleashed our economy, and they still have not gotten Canadians the trade deal they need. The Liberals would have us believe that if one does not support their spending, their failures and their misplaced priorities, they somehow do not support this country. It is crazy. Some members in this House may choose to set aside their principles to prop up this government. However, as a member of His Majesty’s loyal opposition, my job is not to blindly support the government’s agenda. It is to make Canada the best it can be by holding the government to account on behalf of Canadians. The spring economic update is not a plan to make Canada stronger. It is a plan to make Canadians poorer, and that is just not good enough. I believe in a Canada where hard work is rewarded, where the dream of owning a home is within reach and where the generations that follow us inherit something better than a lifetime of debt with nothing to show for it. That Canada is possible, and Conservatives will fight every day to make it happen.

Oral Questions ·

Automotive Industry

“The Prime Minister is allowing 49,000 Chinese electric vehicles into Canada instead of supporting Canadian automakers. Experts say these vehicles spy for China. I want to know why the Prime Minister is risking our security and hurting our auto industry.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister is selling out Canada’s auto sector and doubling down on Chinese EVs. I want to know if he will be riding in one in his motorcade. Experts have called the EVs “rolling spy vans”, designed to feed data back to servers in China. The Prime Minister called China our greatest security threat. The government is still shipping 49,000 of them in while our own automakers are shut out. Why is the Prime Minister compromising our national security and our auto industry to cozy up to Beijing?

“The government's policies hurt Canadian auto jobs while supporting electric cars made in China, including 49,000 imported this year. I want the government to admit it is choosing Chinese car makers over Canadian workers.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, they cannot blame market shifts for their own failures. The Liberal government told us for years that the future is EVs. They just did not tell us that it was Chinese EVs. The government should be making it cheaper for Canadians to buy the cars they want to drive, built by Canadians. Instead, the Liberal policies are killing auto jobs and investment while subsidizing foreign-made electric vehicles, such as the 49,000 imported from China this year. Will the Liberals admit that they are choosing Chinese automakers over Canadian workers?

“Honda cancelled plans for a $15-billion electric car factory in Ontario, costing thousands of jobs. This is because Liberal policies force companies to build cars Canadians do not want, while spending billions to subsidize foreign cars. Why are Canadian auto workers paying the price for the government's failed policies?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I have breaking news. Reports say that Honda has scrapped plans to build a new $15-billion EV plant in Alliston, at the cost of thousands of jobs. This is a direct result of Liberal policies that forced Canadian automakers to make cars that Canadians do not want. They are now spending $2.3 billion to fund rebates on foreign-made EVs. With no consumer demand and no CUSMA deal in sight, it is no wonder manufacturers are walking away. Why are Canadian auto workers paying the price for the Liberals’ failed auto policies?

Government Orders ·

Military Justice System Modernization Act

“I want to know why the government is rushing this bill instead of making sure it is right for veterans and survivors. The government had 10 years to act, but now it is cutting off debate.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I am looking at this bill now, and I would like to know why the Liberal government is prioritizing speed over getting this legislation right for veterans and survivors. The government had 10 years to do something, and now we see it again moving closure. Could the minister comment on that, please?

Oral Questions ·

Finance

“Canadians are paying 59 billion dollars just in interest on the government's debt. That money is not being spent on hospitals, roads, or homes. Will the Prime Minister admit his spending hurts regular people while helping banks?”
Official Hansard

Strap in, Mr. Speaker, because Canadians are now paying $59 billion in interest on the debt. That money is not going toward hospitals, highways or homes. It is contributing to the highest household debt, most unaffordable housing and second-worst productivity and unemployment in the entire G7. The Liberals are so far behind, they think they are in first place. Will the Prime Minister admit that his costly credit card budget is rewarding bankers and lenders while making life harder for everyone else?

“The government is spending too much money, including another $37 billion in this budget. This causes more debt, higher taxes, and higher prices for Canadians. Why is the government doing this?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, after 11 years of Liberal deficits, Canadians are screaming to make it stop, but the banker Prime Minister is not listening. He said they just got started as they pile on another $37 billion in spending, weakening our economy even more. This budget promises more costs, more taxes, more debt and more inflation for hard-working Canadians who are already maxed out. Why are Canadians paying the price for the Liberal government’s out-of-control spending?

Government Orders ·

Government Business No. 9—Changes to the Standing Orders

“The purpose of committees is to question everything the government does. This government thinks it cannot be questioned, so it should not be allowed to control committees.”
  • Speech on a motion

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this speech addressed the specific motion under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Speech on a motion

    Signal 26 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I had to pull up my question for the government House leader. I am glad he is here today. I asked the member for Winnipeg North this question. I did not quite get a satisfactory answer. When justifying the government’s motion, the government House leader called this principle “undeniable”. Does the government understand that the entire purpose of parliamentary committees is to ensure that nothing is undeniable, that every action, every claim, every program and every policy is examined on its own merits? A government that declares itself undeniable has told this House exactly why it must not be trusted with committee control, control that Canadians did not give it in a general election.

Oral Questions ·

International Trade

“Our trade with the United States supports 2.7 million Canadian jobs. The Prime Minister is not fighting for these workers, and he should admit his own weakness.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, by the time I finish asking this question, Canada will have done more trade with the United States than the value of this Prime Minister’s trade agreements with Ecuador, India and the UAE combined. The reality is that our trade relationship with the United States, what the Prime Minister calls a weakness, represents over $900 billion in annual trade and 2.7 million jobs, but he refuses to fight for these workers under our economy. Will the Prime Minister admit that the only real weakness is his own?

“The Prime Minister missed his deadline for a trade deal with the United States. This delay puts 2.7 million Canadian jobs at risk. I want to know the date Canada will finally have this deal.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it has been 278 days since the Prime Minister’s own drop-dead deadline for a trade deal with the United States. In that time, 2.7 million Canadian jobs that depend on cross-border trade have been threatened by tariffs and uncertainty. While Mexico is at the negotiating table, the Prime Minister is on YouTube calling Canada-U.S. trade a weakness instead of fighting for our businesses and workers. There has been enough talking. We just want the date. When will Canada have the trade deal with the U.S. that the Liberals promised?

Statements by Members ·

Government Policies

“The Liberal government has failed over the past year. They failed on trade with the United States, housing costs, government spending, and immigration. Their failures are hurting regular Canadians.”
  • A repeated line

    “If Canada wants a deal with the United States.”

    Said 4 times by 4 members since April 24.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is one year into the Liberal government’s mandate. That means it is report card time. Let us have a look at how the Liberals are doing: negotiating a trade deal with the United States, fail; making housing more affordable, fail; addressing the rising cost of living, fail; lowering government spending, fail; getting immigration under control, fail. Across the board, the Liberal government has earned a failing grade, but it is not the Liberals being held back, it is Canadians. The young couple who cannot afford a first home, the auto worker whose shift got cut, the small business owner who woke up to a 25% tariff and the farmer with nowhere to sell are all being held back. The Prime Minister wants to talk about forward guidance. How about he starts by looking back at 365 days of failure and the impact that has had on Canadians?