Public Safety

Question period dealt with Bill C-22, the government’s lawful access legislation, which would give police and CSIS updated tools to obtain subscriber and electronic data during investigations of serious crimes. Conservatives said they support the parts of the bill that help police catch criminals and want those passed quickly, but said the bill needs changes because, in their view, it would give the government surveillance powers without enough oversight; they asked why the government was proceeding quickly instead of working with other parties. Liberals said delays leave more victims at risk, cited police chiefs who call lawful access their top tool against extortion, organized crime and child exploitation, and pointed to the government’s other public-safety measures, including changes to bail laws. Conservatives also argued violent crime has risen and pointed to their proposals on bail and mandatory minimums.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

6 statements

Frank Caputo, Kamloops—Thompson—Nicola

Conservative
“The government is rushing this bill through Parliament instead of working with us. We support the first part of the bill to put criminals in jail, and we would pass it quickly. But experts and Canadians have serious questions about the second part. Why is the government forcing the second part through without answering them?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, “collaboratively” is the word used by the Minister of Public Safety as to how he would work with Conservatives on Bill C-22 amendments, and yet the government is insisting on using its manufactured majority to now ram this bill through Parliament. Make no mistake: Conservatives want to put the bad folks in jail. We would pass part 1 of the bill swiftly, but Canadians have questions and experts have questions, and we think those questions should be answered with respect to part 2. Why is the Liberal government insistent on ramming Bill C-22 and part 2 through when we would gladly pass part 1 swiftly?

Ruby Sahota, Secretary of State (Combatting Crime)

Liberal

Linked statement

“I want this bill passed quickly. Delaying it puts more people in danger. For example, foreign groups hired people online to shoot at synagogues. Police could have found those shooters sooner if this bill were already law.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Canadians have questions, victims have questions and the police chiefs have questions as to why it has taken so long for Bill C-22, which was originally Bill C-2, to get through the legislative process. Every day that we wait, more and more victims are created in Canada. Take, for example, the shootings at the synagogues that have just happened recently. Those shooters were paid and hired by a foreign entity, in our country, online. Had we been able to find those shooters sooner, there would have been fewer victims.

Rhonda Kirkland, Oshawa

Conservative
“I support giving police the tools they need to fight crime. But this bill gives the government too much power to watch people without oversight. The government should stop rushing it through and work with other parties to fix it.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Conservatives support giving law enforcement officers the effective lawful access tools they need for investigating serious crimes and pursuing criminals. However, expert after expert has been sounding the alarm. Bill C-22 risks creating a surveillance state, more government control without accountability. If this bill is as good as the government claims, why are the Liberals using their manufactured majority to silence opposition and ram this overreaching law through Parliament instead of working with opposition parties to get it right?

Ruby Sahota, Secretary of State (Combatting Crime)

Liberal
“The government is protecting Canadians, but the Conservatives are not. They voted against our bill that protects children from predators.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 31 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, where are the Conservatives who used to care about protecting Canadians? They are not in this House. It is the government that has committed to protecting Canadians through our various bills that we have progressed through this House. Bill C-16 would protect children from child predators, and the Conservatives voted against it. It is an all-time low.

Dane Lloyd, Parkland

Conservative
“Violent crime has gone up, and the Liberals have been too soft on criminals. Police need tools to catch criminals, but the government should not spy on law-abiding Canadians. We want to pass the first part of this bill quickly, but it needs changes to protect people's privacy.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Conservatives will take no lessons from these Liberals on tough-on-crime policies. After 10 years of these Liberals, violent crime in this country has gone up 55%. What did the Liberal government do? It brought bail, not jail for repeat violent offenders. It gutted mandatory minimums. Canadians want to give law enforcement officers the tools they need to catch the bad guys and put them behind bars. What they do not want to see is government overreach, adding surveillance on law-abiding Canadians. Conservatives support getting part 1 of Bill C-22 passed swiftly, but we need changes to protect Canadians’ privacy. Instead of listening, these Liberals are forcing this through with no further scrutiny—

Sean Fraser, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and Minister responsible for the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency

Liberal
“Police chiefs say this bill is their most important tool to stop extortion, organized crime, and child sexual abuse. We have also already changed bail laws to keep people safe.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my hon. colleague says he will take no lessons from the government. Will he take lessons from the head of the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police, who told me that he has been working on lawful access for more than 30 years in this country? He said it is the number one tool that he needs to combat extortion in this country, to combat the scourge of child sexual exploitation and abuse material and to tackle organized crime. The hon. member also mentioned bail. I would point out to him that as of two nights ago, Canada has new laws. We have reformed the bail system. We are reforming the sentencing system. We are implementing a public safety agenda that has not been seen in generations.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 138

  1. Oral Questions The Economy 12 statements
  2. Oral Questions Democratic Institutions 6 statements
  3. Oral Questions Small Business 14 statements
  4. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  5. Oral Questions Agriculture and Agri-Food 2 statements
  6. Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
  7. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 2 statements
  8. Oral Questions Health 7 statements
  9. Oral Questions Employment 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Public Safety 6 statements
  11. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Public Safety 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Natural Resources 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Transportation 4 statements
  16. Private Members' Business Private Members' Business 3 statements
  17. Government Orders Government Business No. 13—Proceedings on Bill C‑22 18 statements
  18. Private Members' Business Spectrum Policy Framework for Canada Act 8 statements
  19. Government Orders Government Business No. 13—Proceedings on Bill C‑22 82 statements
  20. Government Orders Government Orders 3 statements
  21. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 5 statements