Adjournment Proceedings

This adjournment debate was about the federal interim health program that covers asylum seekers, including those whose claims have been rejected. Dan Mazier (Conservative) asked whether it is fair that rejected claimants receive taxpayer-funded benefits such as physiotherapy and home care that many Canadians do not get, and pressed for a yes-or-no answer on the fairness question. Maggie Chi (Liberal) said the program provides temporary coverage so people without provincial insurance can get urgent care before problems become costly emergencies, that it is a bridge rather than a substitute for provincial health care and does not affect wait-lists, and pointed to added fees, faster processing, and a drop in asylum claims as steps to keep the program sustainable.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Dan Mazier, Riding Mountain

Conservative
“The government spent more than $275 million on health benefits for asylum seekers whose claims were rejected. They get extra care like physiotherapy and home care that many Canadians do not get. I want to know if the government thinks this is fair to the taxpayers paying for it.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is always an honour to do the late show. I want to begin with a brief comment, given that we are discussing the work of the health committee. We just received word that the CEO and president of Canada Health Infoway, Michael Green, has been fired by the Infoway board. As Canadians are finding out, Canada Health Infoway is a taxpayer-funded organization the Liberals funnelled $300 million through to run the failed PrescribeIT program. This news comes just hours after Conservatives uncovered that Mr. Green pocketed over $830,000 in taxpayer-funded compensation last year, which included a maximum performance bonus of over $215,000. The only reason Michael Green was fired from Canada Health Infoway is that Conservatives exposed the Liberals’ $300-million PrescribeIT failure. The health minister had every tool to audit and evaluate Infoway, but instead she let the CEO of a failing program pocket millions in taxpayer-funded compensation, including maximum performance bonuses. Conservatives will not stop investigating PrescribeIT until we find out where every dollar went and who else got rich. We are not here to discuss the $300-million PrescribeIT scandal, though. We are here to discuss the $1.5-billion interim federal health program scandal. Thanks to my colleague from Red Deer, Conservatives have uncovered that the Liberals have spent more than $275 million on health benefits for asylum seekers whose claims were rejected by the government’s own Immigration and Refugee Board. According to the Liberal government, rejected asylum claimants remain eligible for deluxe health benefits like physiotherapy, home care and speech therapy. As such, my question is simple. Does the Liberal member believe it is fair that a rejected asylum claimant receives better taxpayer-funded health benefits than the Canadians who are paying for them?

Dan Mazier, Riding Mountain

Conservative
“The member did not answer my question, so I will ask again. Is it fair that rejected asylum claimants get better free health care than the Canadians paying for it?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Liberal member did not answer my question, so I will ask it again. Does the parliamentary secretary for health believe it is fair that rejected asylum claimants receive better taxpayer-funded health benefits than those Canadians who are paying for them, yes or no?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 113

  1. Oral Questions Finance 12 statements
  2. Oral Questions International Trade 5 statements
  3. Oral Questions Finance 14 statements
  4. Oral Questions Labour 4 statements
  5. Oral Questions Finance 10 statements
  6. Oral Questions Infrastructure 3 statements
  7. Oral Questions Finance 19 statements
  8. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Finance 7 statements
  10. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Veterans Affairs 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Privilege 2 statements
  14. Government Orders Weights and Measures Act 28 statements
  15. Private Members' Business Preventing Coercion of Persons Not Seeking Medical Assistance in Dying Act 12 statements
  16. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  17. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 5 statements
  18. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements