Business of Supply

The House debated a Bloc Québécois opposition motion condemning new U.S. tariffs, in force since April 6, 2026, on products containing steel, aluminum and copper, and calling for direct grants, wage support and other help for affected businesses and workers rather than loans. Bloc members said businesses are already too indebted, that tariff revenues should go back to affected sectors, and criticized the government’s focus on pipelines and oil. Liberal members pointed to about $1.5 billion in support through the Business Development Bank and regional agencies, market diversification including a 31% rise in exports to Europe in 2025, and said negotiations with the U.S. need time to reach a good deal. Conservative members said the Prime Minister has not secured a trade deal or a plan as tariffs rise, argued for building pipelines and major projects, and urged direct negotiation with the United States. Some members also raised forestry sector difficulties and conditions in their own ridings.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

1 statement

Gord Johns, Courtenay—Alberni

NDP
“The government is ignoring forestry workers who are hurt by Donald Trump's tariffs. Workers in British Columbia and Quebec need fair support just like other industries. I want my colleague to speak about this.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my Bloc colleague for putting this very important motion forward today. Maybe my colleague could speak about how this government has completely forgotten forestry workers and the forestry sector, and how unfair it has been, in terms of government support for sectors that are struggling due to the harm and damage that Donald Trump’s tariffs are causing Canadian workers in industry sectors, and forestry workers in particular. We heard from the premier of British Columbia just yesterday. He spoke about how the forestry workers in B.C. have not been fairly treated compared to other sectors. We believe that those other sectors should be supported. I also know many forestry workers in Quebec are suffering. I hope my colleague can share her perspective.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 117

  1. Government Orders Business of Supply 117 statements
  2. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 8 statements
  3. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions The Economy 6 statements
  5. Oral Questions Taxation 8 statements
  6. Oral Questions Natural Resources 5 statements
  7. Oral Questions Taxation 2 statements
  8. Oral Questions Rail Transportation 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions Finance 10 statements
  10. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Taxation 4 statements
  12. Oral Questions Finance 7 statements
  13. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 6 statements
  15. Oral Questions National Defence 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Public Safety 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  19. Oral Questions National Defence 8 statements
  20. Government Orders Business of Supply 57 statements
  21. Government Orders Government Orders 2 statements
  22. Government Orders Government Orders 2 statements
  23. Government Orders Government Orders 2 statements
  24. Government Orders Government Orders 3 statements
  25. Government Orders Government Orders 2 statements
  26. Government Orders Government Orders 3 statements
  27. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  28. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  29. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 5 statements
  30. Private Members' Business Spectrum Policy Framework for Canada Act 5 statements
  31. Private Members' Business Spectrum Policy Framework for Canada Act 7 statements