Rail Transportation

During Question Period, members raised concerns about the Alto high-speed rail project between Quebec City and Toronto. Bloc Québécois members said the Montreal–Ottawa section would cross about 1,700 properties, including farmland, without owners’ input, and that residents of Mirabel were being pressed to grant access to their land; they asked the government to require landowners’ consent and to pause and consult the community. Minister Steven MacKinnon replied that farmers’ consent would be sought and that communities, mayors, and agricultural stakeholders would be involved, saying the roughly 1,000-kilometre project is a green transit investment for a large share of Canadians, and he accused the Bloc of trying to block a project people want.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Sébastien Lemire, Abitibi—Témiscamingue

Bloc Québécois
“A new high-speed train route between Montreal and Ottawa will cut through 1,700 properties and ruin 500 farms. The company is taking this land without really listening to farmers. I want the Prime Minister to make them get the farmers' permission first.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Alto has confirmed that the section of high-speed rail between Montreal and Ottawa will go through 1,700 properties. With no input from the owners, 500 of our best pieces of farmland will be cut in half. When the Alto people tell us that they are consulting towns and farmers, it is all for show, because they already know exactly where they want to go and what land they want to expropriate. Alto is steamrolling our farmers. Will the Prime Minister finally ask it to get the farmers’ consent, instead of running roughshod over them?

Jean-Denis Garon, Mirabel

Bloc Québécois
“A train company is pressuring people in Mirabel to let workers onto their land at any time. The government needs to pause this project and talk to the community first instead of intimidating residents.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Alto steamroller is barrelling down on the people of Mirabel for the high-speed train project. At first, Alto employees were knocking on people’s doors to ask permission to perform inspections on their property, but now, they are sending letters to try to buy unlimited access to properties for three years, day or night, for $1,500. Imagine how stressful that is for citizens who have not been consulted, but who are being visited by employees and receiving letters implying that their property will be expropriated. Will the government pause the Alto project and try to earn social licence instead of intimidating people in their own homes?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 117

  1. Government Orders Business of Supply 117 statements
  2. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 8 statements
  3. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions The Economy 6 statements
  5. Oral Questions Taxation 8 statements
  6. Oral Questions Natural Resources 5 statements
  7. Oral Questions Taxation 2 statements
  8. Oral Questions Rail Transportation 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions Finance 10 statements
  10. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Taxation 4 statements
  12. Oral Questions Finance 7 statements
  13. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 6 statements
  15. Oral Questions National Defence 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Public Safety 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  19. Oral Questions National Defence 8 statements
  20. Government Orders Business of Supply 57 statements
  21. Government Orders Government Orders 2 statements
  22. Government Orders Government Orders 2 statements
  23. Government Orders Government Orders 2 statements
  24. Government Orders Government Orders 3 statements
  25. Government Orders Government Orders 2 statements
  26. Government Orders Government Orders 3 statements
  27. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  28. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  29. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 5 statements
  30. Private Members' Business Spectrum Policy Framework for Canada Act 5 statements
  31. Private Members' Business Spectrum Policy Framework for Canada Act 7 statements