Adjournment Proceedings

In adjournment proceedings, Jacob Mantle, a Conservative, followed up on a question about the government’s accounting of Canada’s debt. He argued that the low net debt figures in the spring economic update count public pension funds, such as the Canada and Quebec pension plans, as government assets, and he asked whether the government considers that pension money available to repay debts. Ali Ehsassi, a Liberal parliamentary secretary, replied that the government is focused on cost-of-living relief, listing measures such as the grocery benefit, a summer fuel tax pause, income tax cuts and a tax cut on new homes for first-time buyers, and later spoke about welcoming investment to fund infrastructure projects and grow the economy. Some of the exchange went to Ehsassi addressing a version of the question different from the one Mantle said he asked.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Jacob Mantle, York—Durham

Conservative
“The government says Canada has a very low net debt, but it counts public pension funds to get that number. Those pension funds belong to Canadians, not to the government. I want to know if the government believes these pension funds could be used to pay off Canada's debts.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I am rising to follow up on a question I asked in question period on the topic of the economy and, in particular, the spring economic update, which we have been debating these last few weeks. In the spring economic update, the government’s charts show that Canada has one of the lowest net debt-to-GDP ratios. In fact, the government brags that Canada’s net debt-to-GDP ratio is far below the G7 average of about 100% and is around 10%. However, with every financial statement, I have learned that we have to read the notes, because in the notes we find the information we need to understand these numbers. When we read the notes to these charts, charts 34, 35 and 36, I believe, in the spring economic update, we will find the following in relation to defining government net debt: “The internationally comparable definition of ‘all levels of government’ includes the central, state, and local levels of government, and social security funds. For Canada, this includes the federal, provincial, territorial, and local and Indigenous government sectors, and the Canada Pension Plan and the Québec Pension Plan.” That is the key provision in the note, right at the end, where it says, “and the Canada Pension Plan and the Québec Pension Plan.” What the government is saying is that it has included in its calculation of debt and assets Canada’s pension plans. Of course, including Canada’s pension plans and their assets will lower the net debt-to-GDP ratio, but these assets have been earmarked for future pension obligations. They are not, or at least should not be, available to satisfy general government debt. Of course, the CPP and QPP are independently managed, as they should be. The government is suggesting in its spring economic update that the pension of Canadians be available to satisfy its debts. I am not arguing about the calculation of net debt to GDP right now. I am simply focused on the idea that the government is suggesting that the assets of the CPP and QPP could be used to satisfy government debts. My question to the parliamentary secretary this evening is this: Is it the position of the Liberal government that the CPP and the QPP could be raided by foreign creditors to satisfy the government’s debts?

Jacob Mantle, York—Durham

Conservative
“I want the Minister of Finance to answer my question. Why is he counting public pension plans as assets against the government's debt? Does the government plan to use that pension money to pay back foreign lenders?”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I do not know what is going on here. I asked about the pension plans’ being considered as an asset. Maybe the Minister of Finance will get up and do the rebuttal. Why is the Minister of Finance including the Canada pension plan and the Quebec pension plan as an asset against the Government of Canada’s debt? Is he saying it is his government’s policy that those assets will be available to satisfy foreign creditors? That is the question. Maybe the Minister of Finance will get up and answer it for me.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 122

  1. Government Orders Business of Supply 64 statements
  2. Government Orders Business of Supply 45 statements
  3. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions Taxation 4 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  6. Oral Questions Justice 6 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 16 statements
  8. Oral Questions The Environment 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions Finance 6 statements
  10. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 10 statements
  11. Oral Questions Public Safety 8 statements
  12. Oral Questions Women and Gender Equality 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 6 statements
  14. Oral Questions Natural Resources 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions The Environment 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Business of the House 2 statements
  19. Government Orders Government Orders 2 statements
  20. Oral Questions Taxation 4 statements
  21. Oral Questions Emergency Management 3 statements
  22. Government Orders Business of Supply 15 statements
  23. Government Orders Business of Supply 15 statements
  24. Government Orders Business of Supply 27 statements
  25. Private Members' Business An Act to repeal certain restrictions on shipping 12 statements
  26. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  27. Government Orders Business of Supply 366 statements
  28. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements