Business of Supply

This was a Conservative opposition day motion asking the government to remove all federal taxes on gasoline and diesel for the rest of the year and to cancel the clean fuel standard, which Conservatives presented as relief for households facing high costs of living. Conservatives argued that food bank use, grocery prices, gas prices, and housing costs have made life unaffordable, and that young people in particular feel they can no longer afford a home; they also disputed the suggestion that clean fuel regulations are income for farmers, calling them a cost passed on to consumers. Liberals agreed affordability is a concern but pointed to their own measures, including child care, dental care, a groceries and essentials benefit, and the removal of the consumer carbon price, and asked why Conservatives voted against those programs; one Liberal defended the clean fuel regulations as generating significant revenue for Prairie canola farmers. The Bloc Québécois did not support the motion, arguing that cutting gas taxes and increasing oil production would harm the environment and that the tax cut would cost billions while saving the poorest families little, saying investment in clean energy would be a better response.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Rhéal Éloi Fortin, Rivière-du-Nord

Bloc Québécois
“Cutting gas taxes and producing more oil is the wrong way to help people. It harms the planet. We should be investing in clean energy like wind and solar instead.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, unfortunately, I do not entirely agree with my colleague. In fact, I have the same concern about budgetary matters. It is true that people are struggling to make ends meet. However, the problem is that cutting gas taxes and increasing oil production are counterproductive. This is simply putting things off. The planet will eventually have to be cleaned up because it will no longer be livable. Many countries around the world have gone green and are powered by electric, wind and solar energy, and yet our Conservative colleagues are calling for a return to oil. Unfortunately, the government seems to agree with them, since gas taxes were recently scrapped. I will therefore ask a question, and I would like my colleague to share his thoughts on this. Is it not counterproductive to boost oil production and cut taxes? Should we not instead be investing in a transition to clean energy?

Andréanne Larouche, Shefford

Bloc Québécois
“The Conservative plan will not help people who are struggling with high prices. Cutting taxes costs billions, but only saves the poorest families $59. It adds to the deficit without saying what will be cut. I want to talk about real ways to help people and seniors in need instead.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, today once again, we see the Conservatives drawing conclusions. I just returned from a constituency week. Naturally, people talked to me about inflation, about increasing food bank use and about increasing homelessness. They talked to me about all of that. However, what we are debating today would not help any of these people. In fact, $2.4 billion was lost as a result of the Liberals’ decision to suspend the excise tax until September. This measure only resulted in $59 for the lowest-income households. In the end, that is not what they need. They need more meaningful solutions. What does my colleague think? Where will that money come from in the end? With today’s motion, the Conservative Party wants to increase the deficit without explaining where it will make cuts. Economically, that does not add up. However, if she wants to talk about other ways to help people in need and increase the income of seniors who are living on the streets, we are willing to discuss that.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 122

  1. Government Orders Business of Supply 64 statements
  2. Government Orders Business of Supply 45 statements
  3. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions Taxation 4 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  6. Oral Questions Justice 6 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 16 statements
  8. Oral Questions The Environment 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions Finance 6 statements
  10. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 10 statements
  11. Oral Questions Public Safety 8 statements
  12. Oral Questions Women and Gender Equality 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 6 statements
  14. Oral Questions Natural Resources 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions The Environment 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Business of the House 2 statements
  19. Government Orders Government Orders 2 statements
  20. Oral Questions Taxation 4 statements
  21. Oral Questions Emergency Management 3 statements
  22. Government Orders Business of Supply 15 statements
  23. Government Orders Business of Supply 15 statements
  24. Government Orders Business of Supply 27 statements
  25. Private Members' Business An Act to repeal certain restrictions on shipping 12 statements
  26. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  27. Government Orders Business of Supply 366 statements
  28. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements