Adjournment Proceedings

An adjournment debate on the PrescribeIT e-prescribing program and Canada Health Infoway. Dan Mazier of the Conservatives asked why Liberal MPs were preventing the health minister from testifying at the health committee about the $300-million program, and repeated the question when it went unanswered. Leslie Church of the Liberals said the Conservatives were making unfounded claims about the program, that the government had ended funding for it, that its head was removed and the organization reviewed, and that the minister had appeared before committee; she also said Conservatives were blocking a vote on a study of the HIV crisis.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Leslie Church, Parliamentary Secretary to the Secretaries of State for Labour, for Seniors, and for Children and Youth, and to the Minister of Jobs and Families (Persons with Disabilities)

Liberal
“The Conservatives are spreading false claims about a digital health program to get social media clicks. Our government stopped funding this program, its leader was fired, and we are reviewing the group that ran it. At the same time, Conservatives are blocking a vote to study the HIV crisis, even though advocates and people living with HIV want this study.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 18 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I am very glad to have the opportunity to respond this evening. While the member opposite and many of his Conservative colleagues have drawn up elaborate theories about PrescribeIT and Canada Health Infoway, their position does not make any sense. The member opposite has been making absurd claims about a program launched by the previous government, but here are the facts. Our government ended funding for the program because it was not sustainable. Not only that, but the CEO of the organization that launched the program was fired. On top of that, in the House yesterday during question period, the Minister of Health said that she is reviewing funding for the organization in question, Canada Health Infoway. She is looking at its mandate and said that it is not getting any money unless we are sure that its work aligns with its mandate. It does not get more clear-cut than that, except the Conservatives have decided to spread misinformation about the program, all in the name of social media clicks. It is hard to take the outrage on this seriously, especially when we see the Conservatives’ behaviour at the health committee, where they have been filibustering since May 7. For the last four meetings, they have used every tool at their disposal to stop the health committee from even voting on a study of the HIV crisis. Every so often they have asked who could possibly be asking for such a study, calling it useless. I think most Canadians in the House would agree that, particularly in Pride Month of all months, that is an untenable and unfathomable position. Does the House know who cares about doing this study? It is some of Canada’s leading activists and organizations working in the field of HIV and AIDS who are calling for it. Who else cares about this study? It is the tens of thousands of Canadians living with HIV, not to mention their families and loved ones. When the Conservatives pretend to care about health care in this country, let us look at their actions: spreading false narratives about health care projects and preventing important health care studies from taking place.

Leslie Church, Parliamentary Secretary to the Secretaries of State for Labour, for Seniors, and for Children and Youth, and to the Minister of Jobs and Families (Persons with Disabilities)

Liberal
“The minister has been honest about this issue and met with the committee. The Conservatives are playing games instead of working on things that matter, like health studies on HIV.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 38 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, once again, let us focus on the facts. The minister has been very forthcoming in terms of her presence on this matter and before committee. The previous government helped launch PrescribeIT. Our government announced it was ending. We have already seen that Quebec has signed a contract to launch PrescribeIT in that province. The Conservatives would rather play parliamentary games than focus on issues that matter to Canadians. As we are seeing at the health committee, that means blocking studies on important health topics like HIV. Our government will always focus on what matters to Canadians. It would be very nice if the Conservatives would do the same.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 129

  1. Government Orders Protecting Victims Act 30 statements
  2. Government Orders Protecting Victims Act 27 statements
  3. Statements by Members Ponoka Stampede 2 statements
  4. Statements by Members Retirement Congratulations 2 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 12 statements
  6. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 6 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 14 statements
  8. Oral Questions Climate Change 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  10. Oral Questions Health 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions The Economy 20 statements
  12. Oral Questions Justice 6 statements
  13. Oral Questions Forestry Industry 3 statements
  14. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Points of Order 5 statements
  16. Oral Questions Business of the House 2 statements
  17. Government Orders Protecting Victims Act 26 statements
  18. Oral Questions Artificial Intelligence 4 statements
  19. Government Orders Government Orders 53 statements
  20. Private Members' Business Fair Representation Act 12 statements
  21. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  22. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  23. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 5 statements