“You should say the government should do more than get out of the way of housing.”
What they said. What they meant.
Plain-language translations from the House of Commons.
Recent debates
8 latest topics
Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act
57 statements
Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act
19 statements
Arab Heritage Month Act
5 statements
The Economy
15 statements
Government Priorities
2 statements
Government Priorities
2 statements
Housing
12 statements
The Environment
2 statements
Government Orders
Build Canada Homes Act
A bill to create a new federal Crown corporation called Build Canada Homes to promote affordable housing supply and innovation. In debate, the Bloc focused on how this encroaches on an area of provincial jurisdiction and touted Quebec's distinct approach to housing. The NDP critiqued the bill's lack of concrete targets, accountability measures, or a specified responsible minister. The Liberals emphasized collaboration with stakeholders. The Conservatives warned of added bureaucracy, costs and benefits to Liberal insiders.
“I think the federal government should take a leadership role in housing. The provinces have their own programs. But I think the federal government should be involved too. I think we can agree on that.”
“I want to say the word 'collaboration' a lot. The federal government can't fix housing alone. We need to work with many stakeholders. The NDP member wants to build one million public homes. I want to know what she means by public homes. Does she want the government to build all of them? Would the government subsidize them by 30%? I want more details on her proposal.”
“The bill's supporters should be able to clearly explain what it will cost and what it will do. Instead you're filling time with kind words about collaboration and processes. Remember that spending more borrowed money is not proof the government is doing enough to help. A holistic approach doesn't mean anything if none of the parts have clear goals or accountability.”