Business of Supply

An opposition day motion on the state of Canada’s economy. Conservatives argued the country is in a recession, citing flat or negative GDP growth, declining business investment, weak productivity, and rising food bank use, and called for tax cuts, reduced regulation and more competition. Liberals pointed to job growth since the last election, wages rising faster than inflation, high foreign investment, growing exports and programs such as the national school food program, and argued that describing Canada’s economy as broken hurts the country in trade negotiations. Bloc Québécois members said Liberal policies contributed to a weak economy but questioned whether the Conservatives were overstating how bad things are. A brief procedural exchange concerned quorum and whether members may comment on attendance in the chamber.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

18 statements

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“Canada's economy is doing well compared to other wealthy nations, despite what the Conservatives say. Our government is building major projects across the country, expanding trade around the world, and protecting good jobs by working with the provinces and Indigenous leaders.”
  • A repeated line

    “The expansion of the Port of Montreal.”

    Said 7 times by 5 members since April 28.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, in terms of the opposition day motion, I thought it was really important for us to try to paint a different picture from what the Conservatives have been trying to tell Canadians, day in and day out. Canada as an economy, as a community, is actually doing quite well in comparison to other G20 countries. We continue to work every day on building a stronger and healthier economy. We often talk about how important it is to have a strong economy. In fact, we have had the Prime Minister clearly indicate that we are going to build the strongest economy in the G7. We are committed to doing that, to putting in the effort and the work necessary in order to achieve that goal. Canada has what the world wants in a very real and tangible way. I do not say that lightly because, at the end of the day, if we were to talk to the Prime Minister or any of the ministers who have been travelling abroad, in particular the Minister of Agriculture, the Minister of Industry or the Minister of Foreign Affairs, we would find that, wherever they go, they constantly hear about how others want to invest in and be a part of the Canadian economy or society, in some fashion or another. That should come as no surprise to members opposite. We were very aggressive in the last federal election just over a year ago when Canadians chose a new government and a new Prime Minister with a very clear mandate to build stronger relationships and look at ways to export our products beyond the Canada‑U.S.A. border. It is truly encouraging to see the degree to which, in that last 12 months, we have been very successful at reaching out and getting trade and defence agreements with a number of nations around the world. We have now had, for example, legislative measures here that have passed in Indonesia and the U.K., or England and Northern Ireland. It was really quite encouraging to see legislation and other aspects of trade being expanded. That is not failing to recognize the importance of U.S.‑Canada trade relations. In fact, what we have seen is a substantial increase in trade between Canada and the United States at the same time. I think it is worthy to note the degree to which we as a nation rely on trade. If people wonder why we have a government that is so focused on trying to expand opportunities, they should get an understanding and appreciation of the number of jobs that are very much dependent on trade. I have said this in the past. Canada makes up roughly 0.25% of the world population, yet we contribute far more in terms of trade. That should be in the back of our minds as we look at ways we can build that stronger and healthier economy. Exports and two-way trade matter. They mean literally hundreds of thousands of jobs, but that is not all that, as a government, we are acting on. We have a government that realizes that it is one thing to talk about improving and increasing exports and trade opportunities, but we also have to be able to invest in and build Canada’s infrastructure. We have a government that is very much focused on building that infrastructure in major projects. When we have a Prime Minister who tells not only Canadians but the world that we want to be an energy superpower, it means that we have to be prepared to look internally within Canada to see how we will achieve this. Factor that into trade and how important it is that we work with other jurisdictions, and what we have seen is a team Canada approach at building a stronger and healthier economy. This is because when we talk about those major projects, what we are really talking about is working with stakeholders, provinces, territories and indigenous leaders and looking at projects that are going to help build that economy, whether it is in the energy area or dealing with exports of widgets, which is absolutely critically important. We can ultimately see those tangible results. We have relationships with those provincial entities, territories, indigenous leaders and other stakeholders and we have seen major projects in every region of our great nation. I can talk about wind energy from Atlantic Canada and other energy sources. In the past, I have highlighted the expansion of the port of Montreal. This is a major investment that is going to allow for a lot more in terms of Canada’s ability to export. I can talk about nuclear energy in Ontario. A while back, I was in the Philippines as part of a government trade promotion mission, where I sat around the table with representatives from, I believe, the Ontario government, along with the federal government. Most importantly, there were representatives for nuclear energy potential in the Philippines. They were talking about how they were looking at Canada as a way to expand their nuclear energy supply, in particular, in Ontario, and that is why we see those federal investments. We can play a strong leadership role not only for Ontario or within Canada, but also abroad. Continuing to move from east to west, we can talk about Manitoba and the mining opportunities there through major projects. A personal favourite of mine, and I know the member for Churchill—Keewatinook Aski has been a very strong advocate for it, is the port of Churchill. We can talk about opportunities. Even the Premier of Manitoba is on board, promoting and encouraging opportunities with the port of Churchill. It would provide us, I believe, the opportunity to expand the port to be a year-round port, with the potential of exporting LNG and other types of minerals, scarce minerals, and other items. For the first time in generations, we have seen significant movement, and there is a sense of hope and optimism that we are moving in the right direction by working together and collaborating. We can move on to Saskatchewan, where we can talk about copper mines, canola and potash. The federal government is working well with the provincial government in recognizing the potential that Saskatchewan can materialize for the entire nation. With Alberta, we signed an MOU not that long ago. It was concerning, given the number of MPs from Alberta, that the Conservatives were not on board with that MOU. Now we have an implementation agreement, which is even a step further, because the Government of Canada, working in collaboration with the Province of Ontario, is in a great position to ultimately see more energy sources coming out of Alberta. Working collaboratively can make a difference. We can go to British Columbia. British Columbia leads the nation on things like LNG and mining. I am thinking of copper and other things. We can go into the north, where we are investing billions into northern economic sovereignty. There, we are seeing the promotion of energy can be a resource for actual sovereignty by promoting growth, in terms of our militarization in one form or another, in terms of the north and protecting sovereignty. The bottom line is that the federal government is demonstrating very clearly how, working collaboratively, we can build a stronger and healthier economy and society that all Canadians will be able to take part in. This is a wonderful opportunity. Political entities at different levels of government and municipalities of all different sizes are coming together and recognizing, based on the last national election, that it is time for collaboration. That is what we are witnessing, and there are tangible results there. We have seen other federal initiatives promoting investment, which is so warranted that we are fighting for it, such as the sovereign wealth fund, better known as the Canada Strong fund. The sovereign wealth fund has the potential to be there in a very real and tangible way for Canadians; it also affords Canadians the opportunity to be part of a wealth fund. I believe that the generation of this fund and having it as a resource in Calgary, where we have the Major Projects Office, can be a fantastic asset. We will be able to work in that collaborative fashion, making sure, where we can, that these major projects get off the ground and that they are sustained and highly successful. We have also seen a significant commitment to investments in Canada over the last year. We are not talking about millions of dollars; we are talking about billions of dollars in commitments. That is of great significance, because we recognize the times. We recognize that we need to think beyond the Canada‑U.S.A. border. At the same time, we are also looking, in terms of the United States, at ways we can enhance that relationship. There is a great deal of back-and-forth between American and Canadian politicians and the populations of the respective countries. There is a relationship that is exceptionally deep, between Canada and the United States, and we are going to continue to see that relationship well into the future. At the same time, it is important that we do not capitulate, that Canada stands strong and firm and ultimately achieves the best deal it can under the current administration. Contrary to what we might hear from across the aisle, if it takes time, we are prepared to put in the time. We are prepared to put in the resources. We have a cabinet and ministers who are providing the lead on this file and the capability to deliver for Canadians. That is what we will do on that particular file, recognizing that we exchange nearly $3.6 billion a day, I believe, between our two great nations. What is encouraging is that trade has actually increased year over year, so it is not fair to say or to imply that there is anything otherwise taking place with respect to international trade beyond Canada and the U.S. or between Canada and the U.S. The Prime Minister and the government are very much aware of how important that trade file is for both nations. We are very much aware of the importance of developing, promoting and materializing those major projects. It is something we are committed to doing. I have a quote I want to share with members. It is an important quote that I believe really says a lot, since the last national election just over a year ago. The International Monetary Fund, the IMF, is a fund that is, in essence, an organization that over 190 countries contribute to. It carries a great deal of influence around the world. Here is what it had to say about Canada and our approach: that we are “focus[ed] strategically on investment that [is] progrowth”. This organization is projecting that Canada will have the second-strongest growth in the G7 in 2026. When we put it in that perspective and look, from an economic point of view, at what we have been able to accomplish over the last year, it is leading to the types of results we need to see. As was pointed out on a number of occasions, in May alone, 88,000 jobs were created. Canada is in a great fiscal position to be able to do the things we need to do to support Canadians, such as the groceries and essentials benefit, which is providing support for Canadians. In fact, just last week, 11 million families benefited from that particular program. We reduced the tax on gasoline, the federal excise tax, by suspending it until Labour Day. The issue of affordability is important to this government. I realize I am running out of time. Hopefully, maybe in response to a question, I will be able to provide more details on the environment. However, whenever I talk about economic opportunities, advancements and major projects, I truly believe, as the government does, that sustainable development means the environment, with indigenous people being involved. It means including provinces and territories, working collaboratively, and together we can, in fact, build Canada strong—

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“The Conservatives only say bad things about Canada. In reality, our economy is doing well compared to other countries. We get more foreign business investment per person than other major nations, but the Conservatives ignore the good news.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 21 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is unfortunate, but I guess the member is being consistent with the leader of the Conservative Party, who likes to go around Canada and tell Canadians that Canada is broken, that the sky is falling and that it is a massive darkness. A Conservative MP stands up, and we get the opinion that a black cloud is going over Canada. I would contrast Canada, its economy and overall performance, with any other G7 or G20 country. We have more foreign direct investment coming into Canada on a per capita basis, definitely the best in the G20 and G7 and likely the best in the world. The Conservatives just do not want to recognize when there is good news. If we raise the good news, they—

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“Politicians pick and choose their numbers, but Canada has gained over 150,000 jobs since the last election. We still have a top credit rating, and we are spending more on our military.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 45 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the member is right that sometimes people, and politicians on both sides of the House, will be selective in the stats that they will throw out. Let me give a stat that I believe is important. Since the last federal election, there has been an increase in employment of over 150,000. Members can cherry-pick all they want in between, but at the end of the day, there are 150,000 more jobs since this Prime Minister was elected Prime Minister, and that is given the circumstances of that election. Canada still has a AAA credit rating, and for the first time in generations, we are investing in the Canadian military. We have actually surpassed that 2% of the GDP.

Marilyn Gladu, Sarnia—Lambton—Bkejwanong

Liberal
“I do not think there are enough members in the room for us to be meeting right now.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Signal 31 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I am just surprised. It is the Conservatives’ opposition day, and I do not think we even have the number of people required in the chamber. I would like to ask my hon. colleague if he could just— Some hon. members: Oh, oh!

Marilyn Gladu, Sarnia—Lambton—Bkejwanong

Liberal
“Can the member talk about the good things our government is doing to help our country?”
Official Hansard

It is comments and questions, right? The question is, could the member talk about all of the positive things that our government is doing to restore our country—

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“Our government has done a lot of good work for the economy and for Canadians over the past year. People support what we are doing, but the Conservatives keep complaining.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 39 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the question very much. If we look at what has been achieved over the last 13 or 14 months since Canadians elected our current Prime Minister, it has been a great deal. Someone brought up the analogy of a marathon runner in terms of how the government, and the Prime Minister in particular, is responding to the Canadian economy and society as a whole, bringing in good legislative measures and financial measures to support Canadians. Canadians are seeing it, and they are encouraging us to continue to move forward. Only the Conservatives seem to be the naysayers.

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“Wages have gone up faster than inflation since the last election. Some people still struggle, which is why we started a permanent program to feed school children. It feeds 400,000 kids, but the Conservatives still oppose it.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I wonder if the member opposite would recognize that the average wage has actually increased more than the inflation rate every month since we had that last federal election. At the end of the day, there are individuals who are having some financial difficulties, and that has always been the case. Obviously, we all want to try to assist where we can, and that is where I would challenge the member opposite. A good program is the national school food program, which was made permanent by this Prime Minister, by this government. There are members of the Conservative Party who have called it garbage and said that it does not exist. It feeds 400,000 young children, yet they oppose it. At times, one begins to question just how much hypocrisy is oozing from the other side.

Charles Sousa, Mississauga—Lakeshore

Liberal
“The Conservatives claim Canada's economy is falling apart, even though experts disagree. This hurts Canada and helps the United States in trade talks. I want to know what the member thinks about this.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, how does the member perceive the reaction in trade negotiations when the opposition is proposing that Canada is in a gloomy position, while most economists and experts are not positioning it that way at all? The Conservatives are positioning this as though Canada is in the midst of a tremendous downfall, when in fact it is the opposite, but that is giving leverage and strength to the United States in trade discussions. Can the member comment, please?

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“Conservatives keep saying Canada's economy is broken. Talking down our country only helps the United States instead of Canada.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the question because there is so much truth in what the member said. If we go around and tell the world that Canada’s economy is bad, we cannot trust it, everything is broken and so forth, which is what we hear from Conservative member after Conservative member talking negatively about Canada, that ultimately assists the U.S. over Canada. I would cite the member for Bowmanville—Oshawa North, who went down to the United States, and his report, after meeting with President Trump and the Vice-President, was that Canadians are just having a “hissy fit”—

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“Our government supports every region of Canada. We fund food banks and school food programs for children, which the Conservatives voted against.”
  • A repeated line

    “Such as the national school food program.”

    Said 4 times by 4 members since June 8.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I can assure the member that different regions of the country have different impacts in the community. The government continues to look at all the regions of the country, and we do what we can, such as the national school food program for children, which the member opposite voted against. We also financially support food banks. We are, as a government, a whole lot more compassionate than what we have seen from the Conservatives over the last number of—

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“Foreign investment in Canada is at a 20-year high, and our exports are up both to the United States and the rest of the world. Where is the member getting his numbers?”
Official Hansard

I have two quick points, Mr. Speaker. The member gives the impression that it is an issue of foreign investment. Foreign investment today is at a 20-year high. I do not quite understand how he sees that as a decrease. On exports, we are at least 17% higher internationally, outside of the United States, but also exports to the United States are up from last year. Where is the member really drawing his numbers and conclusions from?

Charles Sousa, Mississauga—Lakeshore

Liberal
“Our economic plan is working. We cut taxes, paused fuel taxes, and helped people buy groceries and homes. Canada's economy is growing, jobs are up, and our debt is the lowest in the G7. The opposition should stop spreading fear about our economy.”
  • A repeated line

    “12 million Canadians will receive the Canada groceries and essentials benefit.”

    Said 7 times by 5 members since June 1.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I am participating in today’s debate to speak about the government’s plan to maintain fiscal stability and provide a bit more clarity on Canada’s economy. The government’s fiscal plan remains rooted in fiscal responsibility. This is not for its own sake, but to create capacity and invest in long-term economic strength and greater self-reliance. Consistent with this approach, the recent spring economic update of 2026 is the government’s next step in building a stronger, more independent and more resilient Canada. It advances the building of more affordable housing and houses. It talks about major infrastructure that transforms and connects our economy while bringing down costs to help Canadians get ahead. It is absolutely important to give a clear and transparent account of Canada’s economy and its performance in an increasingly uncertain world, and to not promote fear. We are advancing major projects that connect and transform our nation, supercharging our housing construction and forging new economic partnerships. We are acting decisively to protect our economic sovereignty and position Canada for greater long-term growth. It is a principled and pragmatic approach. However, some long-term payoffs will take time. To ensure that Canadians have the support they need right now, the government is providing bridging supports. For over a year, Canada’s government has been focused on making life more affordable. Nearly 22 million Canadians are keeping more of what they earn with the middle-income tax cut. First-time homebuyers are saving up to $50,000 with the removal or reduction of the goods and services tax on new homes. The removal of the consumer carbon price has lowered gas prices by 18¢ per litre. The government has temporarily suspended the federal fuel excise tax. Last week, more than 12 million Canadians began receiving hundreds of dollars more through the new Canada groceries and essentials benefit. These are important measures. In a world of geopolitical instability, governments need to rethink how they respond to the headwinds. From a fiscal perspective, especially in light of these challenges, we are delivering up to $11.5 billion in improvements to our project deficit going forward in our budgetary balance. This strength carries into future years, providing the budgetary balance relative to that of budget 2025 by an average of $10.7 billion per year from 2026-27 to 2029-30 before those new measures. This fiscal room allows the government to improve affordability and raise the Canadian standard of living through targeted policy measures. The recent budget marked a strategic shift in the government’s management of public finances. It is focused on expanding federal capital spending to mobilize investments while maintaining those critical programs that so many Canadians rely on. With significant investments in infrastructure, innovation and industrial capabilities, budget 2025 set out a clear plan to build the strongest economy in the G7. The government also remains committed to being disciplined. This includes the comprehensive expenditure review, which now totals over $60 billion in savings and revenues over the next five years. The focus is targeted, beginning with efforts to rein in spending on external management and other consulting services. These challenging actions are necessary. They have the objective of spending less so that we can invest more in Canadians. Canadians are navigating a rapidly changing and increasingly fragmented world. Economic security, industrial policy and geopolitical competition are increasingly shaping investment, trade and financial decisions. The conflict in the Middle East, of course, has disrupted key shipping routes, and damaged energy infrastructure has pushed energy prices higher, underscoring the fragility of global supply chains and adding to an already elevated level of uncertainty. Despite this environment, Canada’s economy continued to expand, growing by 1.9% in 2025. Domestic activity remained solid, even with the elevated tariffs and the impacts they have on our trade tensions. North American supply chains withstood disruptions more effectively than expected, with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement, the CUSMA, protecting approximately 85% of Canadian goods exports from these recent U.S. measures. Businesses and workers have shown remarkable resilience in the face of significant uncertainty. Contrary to the naysayers, firms continue to invest, diversify suppliers and expand into new markets. Canada continues to attract significant global capital, leading the G7 in per capita direct investment inflows. A Statistics Canada survey of planned capital expenditures for 2026 indicates that businesses plan to step up capital spending this year. Reflecting on Canadian adaptability, the International Monetary Fund, the IMF, expects Canada to post the second-fastest growth in the G7 over 2026 and 2027. Labour market conditions have also remained resilient. Since 2024, Canada has added more jobs per capita than the U.S. In May alone, the Canadian economy added 88,000 jobs, which has already been mentioned a number of times today. These jobs are mainly in the private sector, and all of them are full-time. The unemployment rate has fallen to 6.6%. Wage growth has now outpaced inflation for more than three consecutive years, supporting continued gains in real incomes. Overall, the Canadian economy has shown resilience in the face of significant trade tensions and geopolitical uncertainty, and most respected economists and experts agree. Let me remind the hon. members in the House that even with all of the global challenges, Canada starts from a position of strength. Canada’s net debt burden today is lower than any other G7 country’s. It is even below the levels of those countries’ prior to the pandemic. Canada also has one of the smallest deficits in the G7 as a share of its economy. This fiscal challenge gives the government the capacity and responsibility to act to build a stronger economy, make life more affordable, create high-paying jobs, take care of each other and determine our future. Canada’s fiscal position also stands well among 30 other advanced economies. We are one of only two G7 economies, alongside Germany, to maintain a AAA credit rating with most global credit rating agencies. This AAA rating supports investor confidence and keeps us borrowing at lower costs than would otherwise be possible. We know some of the payoffs will take time. That is why our government is standing with Canadians through uncertain and rapidly changing times by acting responsibly to provide supports today and making smart, long-term investments that strengthen Canada’s economy. This means creating the mechanisms to ensure that Canadians thrive today and tomorrow, supporting workers and young people, enhancing the housing sector, combatting financial crimes and investing in strong communities. We need to be on the right track. All members of the House should be collaborating effectively to promote Canada, not creating fearmongering and not giving enough sway and support to the likes of those who are leveraging to downplay the Canadian economy and its strength and the unifying effect that we are seeing. We will stand strong for Canadians, and Canadians will stand strong by continuing to do what they do well.

Charles Sousa, Mississauga—Lakeshore

Liberal
“Our government is helping Canadians who need it most. We cut taxes for the middle class, gave people money for food, paused the fuel tax, and cut the sales tax for first-time homebuyers. The opposition member voted against all of this help.”
  • A repeated line

    “We have effectively eliminated GST for first-time homebuyers on new homes up to $1 million and reduced GST for first-time homebuyers on new homes between $1 million and $1.5 million.”

    Said 11 times by 8 members since May 26.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the member opposite brings up a very important point, which is that during these moments of challenge, it is important for the government to stand by Canadian citizens, especially those who are most vulnerable. What has the government done? We have made middle-income tax cuts, which the opposition member did not approve. We provided the groceries and essentials benefit program. We eliminated the GST for first-time homebuyers. We are putting a pause on the fuel excise tax. We have also launched the automatic federal benefits program to provide more support for those very individuals. The member opposite did not support those measures to help her constituents.

Charles Sousa, Mississauga—Lakeshore

Liberal
“Economists say our economy is doing better than the headlines suggest. Many industries are growing, people are still spending money, and banks expect things to improve.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 44 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the hon. member is bringing the question to me by way of what economists are saying. Let me tell the House what some of the economists are saying. According to Desjardins, “real GDP has contracted for two consecutive quarters”, but according to its analysis, “More than half of the industries in Canada have been expanding over the past six months, and consumers have continued to increase their purchases of good and services.” According to RBC, “we continue to think underlying details in both the labour market and GDP data are better than” what is being headlined and stated in the growth of numbers. According to TD Bank, “Looking to Q2, some bounce-back should be expected.” According to the National Bank, “Two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth can mean very different things depending on what’s happening to the population. Canada’s economy registered a tiny contraction in Q1, following a decline in Q4. Yet real GDP per capita rose nearly 1% in Q1”—

Marilyn Gladu, Sarnia—Lambton—Bkejwanong

Liberal
“Can the member explain how our government's plan is helping to stabilize and grow the economy?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, obviously, as a former finance minister for Ontario, the hon. member understands very well the turbulent impacts that can happen to economies. Can he talk a bit about how our government’s approach is stabilizing and growing the Canadian economy?

Charles Sousa, Mississauga—Lakeshore

Liberal
“The government needs to spend money to grow the economy when times are hard. We must support Canadians through tough times instead of just scaring them and doing nothing.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is important that all levels of government recognize that during points of difficulty, it is important to stimulate economic growth. It is counter-cyclical. That is what is happening here. We have to create the bridge to enable our citizens to weather the challenges before us. We cannot just stand in the House and create fear, saying the sky is falling, and do nothing to help. We have to approve some of the work that is being done to support them in this case.

Charles Sousa, Mississauga—Lakeshore

Liberal
“I want the House to pass our crime bills. We are making it harder for criminals to get bail, giving repeat violent offenders longer sentences, and stopping house arrest for serious crimes. We are also making domestic abuse through coercive control a crime.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it would be great if we installed some of the crime bills that are right before the House, as well as some of the bail sections. We are combatting crime. On this side of the House, we recognize the impact it has on my community, specifically. We are creating the reverse onus and making it harder for criminals to make bail. We are toughening sentencing for repeat and violent offenders. We are criminalizing coercive control to stop domestic violence. We are ending house arrest for criminals who commit—

Sherry Romanado, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of National Defence

Liberal
“I want to know if the member supports our government's programs to train young people for apprenticeships.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this question addressed the preceding speech or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I have not had a chance to work with the member opposite yet here in this Parliament. I would like to ask for her thoughts with respect to the supports that we have been providing for young people, including in the spring economic statement in terms of providing training opportunities for young people. I think that she mentioned some young people in her speech and the importance of supporting young people. I would like to know if she would support those initiatives, in terms of helping train young people for apprenticeships.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 131

  1. Private Members' Business The Criminal Code 6 statements
  2. Government Orders Business of Supply 68 statements
  3. Oral Questions The Economy 12 statements
  4. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 6 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 14 statements
  6. Oral Questions Health 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  8. Oral Questions Youth 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  10. Oral Questions Health 8 statements
  11. Oral Questions Public Safety 6 statements
  12. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Employment 4 statements
  14. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  15. Government Orders Business of Supply 38 statements
  16. Government Orders Business of Supply 28 statements
  17. Government Orders Main Estimates, 2026-27 106 statements
  18. Government Orders Supplementary Estimates (A), 2026‑27 7 statements
  19. Government Orders Government Orders 5 statements
  20. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  21. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements