Adjournment Proceedings

In adjournment proceedings, Garnett Genuis (Conservative) raised the difficulty young Canadians face finding work and asked the government to adopt his party’s four-part plan: lowering taxes and red tape for businesses, changing the immigration system, supporting job training, and building homes near jobs. Parliamentary Secretary Jennifer McKelvie (Liberal) replied that the government is making large investments in youth employment and training, including summer jobs, student work placements, and skilled trades programs. Genuis argued the government had cut grants for trades workers that Conservatives introduced and later brought them back under a new name, and repeated his call for the Conservative plan. McKelvie said the investments help young people build skills and keep the economy strong.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Garnett Genuis, Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan

Conservative
“Too many young Canadians cannot find good jobs. The Conservatives have a four-part plan to fix this: cut taxes and rules for businesses, fix the immigration system, support job-training programs, and build homes near where jobs are located. I want the government to adopt our plan.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, as we approach the end of the parliamentary session for this spring, it is important to highlight the ongoing jobs crisis facing young people, and the constructive measures that Conservatives have put forward. We are here in Parliament working late, but we are blessed to have the opportunity to work on behalf of Canadians. Meanwhile, there are many talented young people with skills and passion that they want to put to work but have not been able to. There are the top‑line unemployment numbers. Underneath that, there is declining labour force participation for young people, and there is the reality that many young people are not able to work in the field they have studied in. They have been encouraged to go in one direction in terms of their studies, yet they are not able to find employment that aligns with that area of study. Over the course of the spring session and the previous fall session, as we have been highlighting the youth unemployment crisis in this country, we have always been very constructive in our approach, putting forward specific policy proposals to address that crisis and inviting the government to embrace those proposals. We have highlighted four key areas as we have advanced our youth unemployment strategy. The first is unleashing the economy, addressing major concerns that small businesses have around the cost of hiring and around red tape and regulation, by having incentives, tax cuts and reduced bureaucracy that encourages investment in Canada. Second, we need to fix the immigration system. When it comes to immigration, we hear a big focus from the government on attracting foreign talent, but not enough focus on deploying the talent that is already in this country. There are so many young people with talent, training and passion who want to get to work. We should be focused on deploying the Canadian talent to give young people opportunities. We need to fix our immigration system so that the people who come here are able to have their credentials recognized so they are not competing for entry-level jobs, and so that we are clearly identifying where the skill gaps and needs are. The first two areas are unleashing the economy and fixing immigration. Third, we need to fix training. The government is going in the opposite direction. It is pulling funding for student grants for students in vocational programs. We should be celebrating and recognizing the value of different kinds of post-secondary options, including vocational programs that provide practical, job-ready skills for young people. We need to be training young people for Canadian jobs. We know there is a desire for skilled workers. The response to that should be to train young people to be ready to fill those skilled positions, yet there is a specific attack on vocational institutions by the government. Fourth, we need to build homes where the jobs are. Conservatives are proposing constructive policies to support labour mobility so young people can take up opportunities that may exist outside the region they live in. We have very high unemployment in larger centres, and we have many opportunities in rural and remote areas to seize opportunities for young people who are able. However, when I talk to young people about whether they think they would be able to seize those opportunities, transportation and housing are major concerns if they are moving to an area that is unfamiliar. That is why we have included in our jobs plan incentives to make it easier for employers to offer workforce housing. We need to unleash the economy, fix immigration, fix training and build homes where the jobs are. That is our constructive Conservative plan to address the youth unemployment crisis. It is offered in good faith. Would the government take those good ideas that we have put forward?

Garnett Genuis, Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan

Conservative
“The Liberals cut grants for trades workers that Conservatives created, and then brought them back under a new name. We need to support trades workers instead of cutting job training. The government should use our Conservative youth jobs plan.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is clear from that response that the government has nothing new to offer. The parliamentary secretary spoke about programs that have existed since the 1990s and their rebranded Canada strong program. Here are the facts: Conservatives introduced grants for trade workers in 2009 and 2006: 2009 were the completion grants, 2006 were the other grants introduced for trade workers. The Liberals cancelled those grants. The Minister of Jobs and Families defended the decision to cancel those grants, and then, in the face of significant advocacy from unions, as well as Conservatives and other organizations, the government chose to restore funding that the Liberals had cut. Restoring something that they cut and giving it a new name is not doing something new. We absolutely need to support trades workers. They should not have cut those grants in the first place, but they also should not be cutting grants for vocational training. The fact is the government has nothing new. Why will the Liberals not adopt our Conservative youth jobs plan?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 133

  1. Oral Questions Member for Côte-du-Sud—Rivière-du-Loup—Kataskomiq—Témiscouata 2 statements
  2. Oral Questions International Trade 4 statements
  3. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 2 statements
  4. Oral Questions The Economy 14 statements
  5. Oral Questions Taxation 2 statements
  6. Oral Questions Rail Transportation 12 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  8. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Natural Resources 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Housing 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions National Defence 6 statements
  12. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Air Transportation 3 statements
  15. Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
  16. Oral Questions The Economy 19 statements
  17. Government Orders Bail and Sentencing Reform Act 11 statements
  18. Private Members' Business Food and Drugs Act 9 statements
  19. Government Orders Government Orders 24 statements
  20. Government Orders Government Orders 16 statements
  21. Government Orders Government Orders 25 statements
  22. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements