Rail Transportation

During question period, members raised the Alto high-speed rail project planned for Quebec and Ontario after farmers from the Mirabel area protested on Parliament Hill against the loss of their land. The Bloc Québécois said the government has not met conditions including consultation, respect for landowners facing expropriation, and an independent financial review, and asked the minister to meet with the farmers. Conservatives said the project threatens farming communities, questioned spending over $100 billion on it when many Canadians face food insecurity and financial strain, and asked the government to stop it. Liberal ministers said they respect farmers and will seek a middle ground, and argued the project would create jobs, connect major cities, boost trade between Quebec and Ontario, and reduce pollution.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Jean-Denis Garon, Mirabel

Bloc Québécois
“Farmers from Mirabel protested on Parliament Hill today because they oppose the high-speed train project. They do not want the government to take their land. The minister should meet with them and answer their questions.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, hundreds of farmers from Mirabel braved the rain today on Parliament Hill. They came to tell the Liberals that they are not happy with Alto’s high‑speed train project in its current form. It is too bad that the minister did not come out to meet with them. He could have answered all the questions that Alto has been refusing to answer since January. If the Liberals think they are going to be able to forcibly expropriate land in Mirabel yet again, our farmers proved today that they have another think coming. Will the government finally respect our farmers, meet with them and answer their questions?

Jean-Denis Garon, Mirabel

Bloc Québécois
“The government has failed to meet our conditions for the high-speed train project, including consulting people and respecting landowners' rights. Farmers are protesting because testing is already happening on their land without their consent. I want the minister to come to Mirabel with me to answer their questions.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, this proves that the debate on high‑speed rail is not over; in fact, it has only just begun. We had set out four conditions: social licence, an independent financial assessment, no infringement of people’s rights in the event of expropriation, and genuine consultations. They have scored zero out of four. It is no wonder that farmers are protesting. Alto is already on their land, carrying out tests, and when the landowners say no, Alto wants to send in drones. I am offering to drive the minister to Mirabel so that he can come and answer their questions. He can even choose what music we listen to in the car. When do we leave?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 133

  1. Oral Questions Member for Côte-du-Sud—Rivière-du-Loup—Kataskomiq—Témiscouata 2 statements
  2. Oral Questions International Trade 4 statements
  3. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 2 statements
  4. Oral Questions The Economy 14 statements
  5. Oral Questions Taxation 2 statements
  6. Oral Questions Rail Transportation 12 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  8. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Natural Resources 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Housing 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions National Defence 6 statements
  12. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Air Transportation 3 statements
  15. Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
  16. Oral Questions The Economy 19 statements
  17. Government Orders Bail and Sentencing Reform Act 11 statements
  18. Private Members' Business Food and Drugs Act 9 statements
  19. Government Orders Government Orders 24 statements
  20. Government Orders Government Orders 16 statements
  21. Government Orders Government Orders 25 statements
  22. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements