Bail and Sentencing Reform Act

Bill C-14, Bail and Sentencing Reform Act · Time allocation motion · now law Where it stands

The House debated a government motion to limit, to five further hours, debate on the Senate’s amendments to Bill C-14, the Bail and Sentencing Reform Act, which changes bail and sentencing rules for violent and repeat offenders. The Minister of Justice argued the Senate changes are straightforward, that the bill has broad support including from premiers, and that delays could push the measures off for months. Conservatives opposed the time allocation, saying an important bill deserved full debate and accusing the government of cutting off debate it used to criticize; the Bloc Québécois also asked why the motion was needed given the apparent agreement on the bill, and the NDP said the government had rejected worthwhile Senate amendments and that proper debate would help get the bill right. Some time also went to members’ questions about sexual assault cases in their ridings and to exchanges about past use of time allocation by governments of both parties.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

1 statement

Elizabeth May, Saanich—Gulf Islands

Green
“The government is rushing this bill through because it chose to end our work two days early. We should stay longer this summer to properly debate bills. I did not agree to pass this bill, and small parties did not get a fair chance to say no.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, when the hon. Minister of Justice says we have a very small window to push through legislation, that is entirely due to the government’s decision to adjourn two days early. I wish the government had come to me and asked how I would feel about staying later this summer to properly study bills and not push through the destruction of pesticide regulations in an omnibus budget bill. I know it is not the minister’s problem, but we are being pushed to the last minute and told we could not debate something as important as the Senate amendments to Bill C‑14. I opposed Bill C‑14. It was never passed unanimously, contrary to what the Liberal deputy House leader said. It was on division because members like me, who are not in a recognized party, cannot even stand up and scream “no” when they decide to vote on division.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 135

  1. Government Orders Government Business No. 12—Proceedings on Bill C-30 18 statements
  2. Oral Questions Public Safety 8 statements
  3. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions Seniors 10 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  6. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  7. Oral Questions Public Safety 2 statements
  8. Oral Questions Health 6 statements
  9. Oral Questions Youth 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions The Economy 6 statements
  11. Oral Questions Employment 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 4 statements
  13. Oral Questions Infrastructure 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Climate Change 4 statements
  15. Government Orders Bail and Sentencing Reform Act 38 statements
  16. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  17. Private Members' Business Ukrainian Heritage Month Act 12 statements
  18. Oral Questions International Trade 4 statements
  19. Oral Questions Labour 4 statements
  20. Government Orders Bail and Sentencing Reform Act 26 statements
  21. Government Orders Final Self-Government Agreement for the Tłegǫ́hłı̨ Got’įnę Act 31 statements