Bail and sentencing rules
C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform Act: An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Youth Criminal Justice Act and the National Defence Act (bail and sentencing)
Adds new bail conditions and sentencing rules for violent crimes, car theft, and break-ins.
What the law does
The law changes bail and sentencing rules in the Criminal Code, the Youth Criminal Justice Act, and the National Defence Act. It places the burden on people accused of certain violent offences, car theft, or home break-ins to show why they should be released on bail. It also adds new aggravating factors for sentencing repeat violent offenders and those who target first responders, and restricts conditional sentences for sexual assault. The law makes other changes to youth justice rules and military justice.
Official summary
This enactment amends the Criminal Code to, among other things, (a) provide direction to peace officers, justices and judges when they apply the principle of restraint; (b) require a justice, before making a release order or a detention order in respect of an accused, to consider whether the accused is charged with an offence in the commission of which random and unprovoked violence was used or attempted; (c) require a justice to impose a condition prohibiting the possession of a firearm or other weapon, and to consider imposing other conditions, when making a release order in respect of an accused charged with the offence of extortion or any offence involving a criminal organization; (d) require a justice to consider imposing certain conditions when making a release order in respect of an accused charged with an offence of motor vehicle theft or with the offence of breaking and entering a dwelling-house; (e) create a reverse onus provision for any accused charged with the offence of motor vehicle theft involving violence, motor vehicle theft for a criminal organization, extortion involving violence, breaking and entering a dwelling-house, certain offences related to trafficking in persons or human smuggling or certain offences in which an accused is alleged to have choked, suffocated or strangled a complainant; (f) expand the reverse onus provision to any person charged with a serious offence involving violence and the use of a weapon who has been previously convicted, within 10 years, of a serious offence involving violence and the use of a weapon; (g) add the number or gravity of any outstanding charges against an accused as circumstances that a justice is to consider in assessing whether the detention of the accused is necessary to maintain confidence in the administration of justice; (h) expand the circumstances in which the release documents that an accused is subject to may be canceled; (i) create a reverse onus provision for any person who has been found guilty of certain offences if the prosecutor applies to vacate that person’s interim release order; (j) create new aggravating factors to address repeat violent offending, offences against first responders, retail theft and theft and mischief to property offences; (k) add new consecutive sentence provisions for repeat violent offences, motor vehicle theft offences and breaking and entering offences, and extortion and arson offences; (l) require courts to give primary consideration to denunciation and deterrence of repeat motor vehicle theft offences, repeat breaking and entering offences and organized crime offences; (m) restrict the possibility of imposing conditional sentence orders for sexual assault, and offences of a sexual nature or committed for a sexual purpose that involves a victim under 18 years of age; (n) restore the availability of driving prohibitions for the offences of manslaughter and criminal negligence causing bodily harm or death; and (o) improve the administration of justice as it relates to sentencing by increasing the penalty for contempt, enhancing the fine enforcement regime and expanding the availability of remote appearances in the mental disorder regime.
It also amends the Youth Criminal Justice Act to, among other things, (a) clarify the definition of “violent offence” to mean, among other things, an offence in the commission of which a young person causes bodily harm; (b) provide that the time a young person is unlawfully at large does not count towards time served for a youth custody and supervision order; (c) enable police officers to publish identifying information about a young person in urgent situations where there is an imminent danger to public safety; (d) clarify the process for the detention and release of young persons who are remanded for an alleged breach of a condition of their youth custody sentence while awaiting a review by the youth justice court; (e) set out a period of access for records of extrajudicial measures, other than extrajudicial sanctions, and clarify the rules for records of investigations kept by police that did not result in a charge or extrajudicial measures; and (f) make several technical sentencing amendments. It also amends the National Defence Act to, among other things, (a) improve the administration of military justice as it relates to sentencing by increasing the penalty for contempt; (b) require courts martial to give primary consideration to denunciation and deterrence of offences involving criminal organizations; and (c) create new aggravating circumstances to address repeat violent offending, offences against first responders, stealing for commercial purposes and certain property offences. Finally, the enactment also includes transitional provisions and coordinating amendments.
- Kind
- Government bill
- Sponsor
- Sean Fraser, Minister of Justice (Central Nova)
- Introduced
- in the House of Commons
- Last activity
Where it stands
- ProposedOct 23, 2025
- Being debated
- Almost law
- LawJun 15
Became law June 15
-
First reading in the House done
Before the House on 1 sitting day,
-
Second reading in the House done
Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights
Before the House on 4 sitting days, to
2nd reading and referral to committee - JUST: agreed to on division,
-
Committee in the House done
Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights
Before the House on 1 sitting day,
-
Report stage in the House done
Before the House on 1 sitting day,
-
Third reading in the House done
Before the House on 1 sitting day,
3rd reading: agreed to on division,
-
First reading in the Senate done
Before the Senate on 1 sitting day,
-
Second reading in the Senate done
Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs
Before the Senate on 3 sitting days, to
-
Committee in the Senate done
Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs
Before the Senate on 1 sitting day,
-
Report stage in the Senate done
Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs
Before the Senate on 1 sitting day,
-
Third reading in the Senate done
Before the Senate on 1 sitting day,
-
Royal assent done
Exact procedural stages
-
House
- First reading in the House: done, 2025-10-23
- Second reading in the House: done, 2025-11-18
- Committee in the House: done, 2026-02-09
- Report stage in the House: done, 2026-02-13
- Third reading in the House: done, 2026-02-13
-
Senate
- First reading in the Senate: done, 2026-02-24
- Second reading in the Senate: done, 2026-03-12
- Committee in the Senate: done, 2026-05-26
- Report stage in the Senate: done, 2026-05-27
- Third reading in the Senate: done, 2026-05-28
-
Royal assent
- Royal assent: done, 2026-06-15
Debates in the House 4
Members who spoke: Liberal 8 Conservative 8 Bloc Québécois 3
Senate amendments 1
-
Bail and Sentencing Reform Act
12 members spoke
- David Bexte Conservative A statement 1, graded AC– statement 2, graded C–A statement 3, graded AA statement 4, graded AA statement 5, graded A6 statement 67 statement 7
- Kevin Lamoureux Liberal B statement 1, graded BA statement 2, graded AA– statement 3, graded A–B statement 4, graded BC+ statement 5, graded C+
- Christine Normandin Bloc Québécois A+ statement 1, graded A+A+ statement 2, graded A+A+ statement 3, graded A+
- Alex Ruff Conservative B+ statement 1, graded B+
- Mark Gerretsen Liberal B– statement 1, graded B–
- Burton Bailey Conservative B+ statement 1, graded B+
- Blaine Calkins Conservative 1 statement 1
- Marilyn Gladu Liberal 1 statement 1A+ statement 2, graded A+C– statement 3, graded C–
- Tony Baldinelli Conservative C statement 1, graded C
- Guillaume Deschênes-Thériault Liberal A+ statement 1, graded A+
- Mario Beaulieu Bloc Québécois A+ statement 1, graded A+
- Branden Leslie Conservative B– statement 1, graded B–
Time allocation, closure and other motions on the bill 2
-
Bail and Sentencing Reform Act: Bill C-14-Notice of Time Allocation Motion
1 member spoke
- Sean Fraser Liberal 1 statement 1
-
Bail and Sentencing Reform Act: Bill C-14-Time Allocation Motion
16 members spoke
- Sean Fraser Liberal 1 statement 1B statement 2, graded BA+ statement 3, graded A+A+ statement 4, graded A+B statement 5, graded BA– statement 6, graded A–A+ statement 7, graded A+B– statement 8, graded B–A– statement 9, graded A–A+ statement 10, graded A+A+ statement 11, graded A+A statement 12, graded AA statement 13, graded AA statement 14, graded AB statement 15, graded BA+ statement 16, graded A+A statement 17, graded AA+ statement 18, graded A+A+ statement 19, graded A+
- David Bexte Conservative B– statement 1, graded B–A statement 2, graded A
- Christine Normandin Bloc Québécois A– statement 1, graded A–2 statement 2
- Kelly DeRidder Conservative 1 statement 1B+ statement 2, graded B+
- Mark Gerretsen Liberal B+ statement 1, graded B+
- Claude DeBellefeuille Bloc Québécois A statement 1, graded A
- Gord Johns NDP A statement 1, graded A
- Fred Davies Conservative A+ statement 1, graded A+
- Sima Acan Liberal 1 statement 1
- Branden Leslie Conservative B+ statement 1, graded B+
- Marc Dalton Conservative C+ statement 1, graded C+
- Elizabeth May Green A– statement 1, graded A–
- Kevin Lamoureux Liberal A– statement 1, graded A–B statement 2, graded B
- Connie Cody Conservative A statement 1, graded A
- Dave Epp Conservative 1 statement 1
- Eric Melillo Conservative A statement 1, graded A
Other debate 1
-
Bail and Sentencing Reform Act
7 members spoke
- Kerry Diotte Conservative 1 statement 1
- Brendan Hanley Liberal 1 statement 1
- Larry Brock Conservative A+ statement 1, graded A+A+ statement 2, graded A+
- John-Paul Danko Liberal 1 statement 1
- Jennifer McKelvie Liberal A+ statement 1, graded A+B statement 2, graded BC+ statement 3, graded C+A– statement 4, graded A–
- Andréanne Larouche Bloc Québécois A– statement 1, graded A–
- Vince Gasparro Liberal A+ statement 1, graded A+
Also raised in 33
Question Period, members' statements and other debates where the bill came up.