Building Canada Strong Act

Bill C-39, Building Canada Strong Act · Second reading · now at committee in the House Where it stands

What Bill C-39 would do

The bill would set one-year deadlines for impact assessments of major energy projects, including pipelines, power lines, and offshore renewables, once required information is submitted. It would also allow the federal government to designate trade corridors, adjust port governance and rail switching rules, and let electronic documents replace paper records for trade. In addition, the bill would introduce new collective bargaining rules and timelines under the Canada Labour Code, along with changes to environmental reviews and fisheries offsetting fees.

Official text (opens in a new tab)

67 statements

Guillaume Deschênes-Thériault, Madawaska—Restigouche

Liberal
“The Major Projects Office is reviewing more than 20 projects worth $500 billion. The premier of Alberta is hopeful about its work. I want the member to tell us if he feels hopeful about it too.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Major Projects Office, headquartered in Calgary, in my colleague’s province, is currently studying more than 20 projects representing $500 billion in investments. Even the premier of his province said that she was optimistic about the Major Projects Office. I would like to ask my colleague whether he shares his provincial premier’s optimism about the Major Projects Office.

Michael Ma, Markham—Unionville

Liberal
“I want the House to pass this bill. It cuts red tape for transportation projects so we can review them faster, while still protecting the environment and Indigenous rights.”
  • A repeated line

    “Our government is focused on what we can control.”

    Said 9 times by 7 members since April 30.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Bill C-39, the building Canada strong act, puts forward important legislative changes that would build on the government’s effort to protect Canada’s economic future by reducing the regulatory burden faced by the Canadian transportation sector. Last year, the government passed the Building Canada Act, which focused on accelerating the development of projects of national interest and removing barriers to internal trade and labour mobility. Today I am pleased to tell members that we have worked diligently in the last months on timely project reviews, streamlining government processes, ensuring that safeguards are in place when expediting project reviews, and reducing costs to Canadians and businesses. We all know that the global post-Cold War consensus has ruptured. For much of our history, Canadians have been able to count on favourable trade conditions, including a stable relationship with the United States; increasingly open access to the American market; and rules that both countries understood and respected. These conditions have not simply shifted. The decades-long process of steadily increasing integration between our economies is over. Tariffs are being treated as leverage, and supply chains are being treated as vulnerabilities. In a rapidly changing world, Canada’s new government is focused on what we can control. We are building our strength at home and diversifying our partnerships abroad. We have the right plan to build Canada strong. We are on track, and it is working. Transportation is the vital link connecting every other priority we have. We cannot diversify trade, build the strongest economy in the G7 and strengthen Canada’s competitiveness without a transportation system that works. Canada’s trade corridors connect Canadian businesses to markets and supply chains at home and around the world. We heard directly from indigenous peoples, the transportation industry and Canadians about what is needed to build stronger, more efficient and more resilient supply chains. We are taking action to reduce red tape, strengthen supply chains, accelerate infrastructure development and attract the investment needed to grow Canada’s economy and create good jobs. For too long, we have let red tape and underinvestment hinder the innovation and productivity of Canadian companies. We are not modern enough. We are too bureaucratic. We have not invested enough in our infrastructure. Other countries find us unreliable. These are things that we urgently have to address. That is why we would be providing regulatory certainty to modernize the rules that govern how we build and putting real investment behind the infrastructure we need to compete in this new world while protecting the health, safety and security of Canadians and the environment, and respecting indigenous rights. To support the government’s commitment to lower costs for Canadians and build a stronger economy, the government launched a red tape review in July 2025. Federal departments and agencies identified approximately 500 recent achievements and forward-looking actions to reduce regulatory red tape. This bill would begin the implementation of some of these forward-looking actions, showing how the government would deliver on its commitment to address barriers that slow private investment, limit labour mobility and restrict competition. Canada needs to be seen as a reliable and beneficial place to invest and do business. Inefficiencies in our trade processes and supply chains are costly and can hurt our reputation as a reliable trading partner. To maximize the full value of our budget 2025 investments, we must address long-standing constraints in the transportation system that limit investment, productivity, diversification and growth in key trade-enabling assets. The bill would support a more modern, responsive transportation system that can handle economic pressures, improve transportation performance and unlock new capacity across supply chains. A critical piece of this bill addresses the urgent need for timely and coordinated project reviews. Securing approvals for project works can take months or even years, creating significant delays in project delivery and limiting opportunities for job creation. These delays deter investment in resource projects, including in mining and oil and gas. This bill includes measures to reduce red tape and regulatory burden through a new transportation project office, which would complement efforts being led by the Major Projects Office and the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada to strengthen federal permitting coordination and Crown consultation for transportation projects to meet the government’s commitment of one project, one review within one year of receiving all necessary information from the proponent. These changes would enable industry to advance large-scale projects more efficiently with greater certainty, helping attract investment and facilitate trade-enabling infrastructure. The transportation project office would work to reduce bottlenecks, improve coordination and offer a one-window approach to proponents. This improved approach would maintain existing safeguards that ensure the integrity of project reviews. The objective is to unlock greater efficiency, not more risk. Similarly, the government is committed to having indigenous views and partnerships shape how projects are developed and carried out. We remain committed to upholding indigenous rights, including rights stemming from section 35 of the Constitution and from the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and to working with indigenous peoples during the implementation phase. The bill would also give Canada the tools to rapidly align with trusted international standards, strengthen how we collect, use and protect industry data, and modernize our marine security framework to better protect critical Canadian assets. Following the “tell us once” principle, government efforts on trade digitization will make it simpler for Canadian businesses to submit the necessary information to move trade faster and more efficiently across our borders. I want to especially highlight that last point. Today, industries fulfilling regulatory requirements are routinely required to submit the same or similar data to multiple departments in various formats and on different timelines. This imposes real costs and administrative burdens on businesses in meeting their regulatory obligations when engaging in international trade. Canadian businesses expect clear communication, faster turnaround times and the ability to track the status of their requests. By reducing duplication and streamlining reporting, a trade digitization initiative, once implemented, will lower costs and save time, ease the overall administration burden and let businesses focus primarily on growth and innovation. The bill would also provide authorities to enable Canada to rapidly align with trusted international standards, giving industry the certainty it needs to plan and invest with confidence, especially as Canada seeks to grow. With our rules and regulations moving at the same pace as those of our international partners, Canadian innovation and productivity would be unleashed, and Canadian companies could compete on a level playing field with their international competitors.

Michael Ma, Markham—Unionville

Liberal
“Transportation projects are vital for our supply chains and trade. We created a special office to coordinate these projects on their own, instead of putting them into one giant bureaucracy with other reviews.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 46 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, as I said in the speech, transportation projects are critical for our supply chain in Canada, in our trade with international partners. The transportation project office is intended to be the lead coordinator for transportation projects not already coordinated by IAAC, CER, CNSC or the Building Canada Act processes. These are all separate streams. Another bureaucracy would have bundled them all together, but we have chosen that the transportation project office would focus specifically on the transportation programs.

Michael Ma, Markham—Unionville

Liberal
“Our government respects endangered species. Our review process will protect endangered animals and follow international rules.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Canadian government certainly respects endangered species. In these processes and reviews, those would be taken into consideration to make sure that we protect endangered animals as well as follow international rules.

Greg Fergus, Hull—Aylmer

Liberal
“Investors need quick answers to make decisions. Does my colleague agree that Canada cannot afford to take a long time to approve projects?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my colleague from Ontario is a seasoned businessman. He is well aware of the importance of getting quick answers when a final decision needs to be made by a group of investors for a project. I would like to know whether he believes that Canada can afford to take a long time before reaching a decision. Should we not instead, in the current context, try to make comprehensive and swift decisions?

Michael Ma, Markham—Unionville

Liberal
“I support this bill because Canadian businesses need to move faster to compete. Right now, shipping companies must fill out 12 different forms across five government offices. This bill lets them file their information once, which cuts red tape and lowers costs.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, that is a wonderful question. As my colleague mentioned, from a business perspective, and as I mentioned in my speech, speed and efficiency are critical for Canadian businesses to compete in this global market, and all those considerations are certainly in there. I would like to highlight that in this process, we mentioned efficiencies for transportation. The marine sectors currently have to provide 12 distinct forms, with five federal departments and agencies, in duplicate. Ninety per cent of trade, by volume, with non-U.S. countries is carried out by marine vessels. Therefore, making it easier to file that data once and have it shared securely across departments would meaningfully cut red tape as we work to diversify trade. That is just a good example of how, throughout this process, we would be helping Canadians and helping our businesses to conduct business faster, and therefore reducing costs, making us more competitive.

Guillaume Deschênes-Thériault, Madawaska—Restigouche

Liberal
“The previous speaker is wrong to say we have not started any major projects. Construction has already begun on a port, a highway, and power lines. We need this bill to help us build even more projects that will grow our economy.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my colleague mentioned a few things in her speech that I think are inaccurate. She said that no projects have seen shovels in the ground, but that is completely false. I am thinking of the Contrecoeur port project, which began last spring, and the Mackenzie Valley Highway, which began construction this summer. I am also thinking of the electrical transmission project on the north shore, which got under way this year. Those are a few examples. Building projects of national interest means shovels in the ground. Thanks to Bill C‑39, we will continue to build even more. I encourage my colleague to review the list of projects of national interest that are being studied and to follow their progress very closely, because there is a lot of potential there for strengthening our economy.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 146

  1. Government Orders Business of Supply 110 statements
  2. Oral Questions International Trade 13 statements
  3. Oral Questions The Environment 6 statements
  4. Oral Questions Taxation 16 statements
  5. Oral Questions Pensions 4 statements
  6. Oral Questions Taxation 10 statements
  7. Oral Questions National Defence 2 statements
  8. Oral Questions Canada Revenue Agency 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions Small Business 4 statements
  10. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  11. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 6 statements
  12. Oral Questions Health 7 statements
  13. Oral Questions Natural Resources 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Agriculture and Agri-Food 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Democratic Institutions 5 statements
  17. Government Orders Business of Supply 42 statements
  18. Oral Questions Women and Gender Equality 3 statements
  19. Private Members' Business Youth Criminal Justice Act 11 statements
  20. Government Orders Business of Supply 22 statements
  21. Government Orders Building Canada Strong Act 7 statements
  22. Government Orders Building Canada Strong Act 166 statements
  23. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  24. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements