MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Hon. Lena Metlege Diab

Liberal Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 261 statements translated

Diab rarely gives a clear yes or no answer and frequently dodges around questions in the House, filling time with slogans about 'protecting Canadians' and the government's plans. She openly says she won't answer specific questions if they're 'traps' or demands she doesn't like, and often pretends not to understand the real point. When she does give concrete numbers, they're usually self-flattering stats or promises of deportations she claims will happen eventually.

Government Orders

Business of Supply

2026-05-28

“I'm filling time with kind words and saying nothing anyone could pin down later.”

“I'm filling time with kind words and saying nothing anyone could pin down later. We can't help everyone, but we'll help who we can. I want to praise Canada's immigration policies for being compassionate and welcoming to refugees and vulnerable people. Our government is committed to continuing this humanitarian tradition.”

Official Hansard

Mr. Chair, I actually have a lot to say to respond to this particular member, the member for Pierrefonds—Dollard, because he has been a tremendous advocate and has worked very hard for the people in his community but also for vulnerable communities throughout. He has been a real champion on humanitarian issues. What really struck me is that he brought his youth council into his office when they visited Ottawa, and they stopped in at my office. They were incredibly thoughtful and engaged young people. Through them, I got to see the real work this member is doing in his community, as well as what I have seen since being here, since 2021. Canada has long been recognized as a country that offers protection to people fleeing conflict, persecution and instability. This tradition remains an important part of who we are. Canadians also expect humanitarian commitments to be delivered through a system that is fair, sustainable and responsibly managed. That is exactly what the 2026-27 main estimates will help to do. I said earlier, and the fact is, that around the world, displacement is increasing. Humanitarian crises are becoming more frequent and more complex, and immigration systems globally are under growing pressure. Canada cannot respond to every crisis in the same way, but we can ensure that our response is principled, coordinated and aligned with our capacity to support people properly once they arrive. That means balancing compassion with responsible planning. The main estimates support the people, partnerships and operational tools needed to maintain that balance. They include support for protected persons already in Canada who are transitioning to permanent residence. These individuals have already been recognized as needing Canada's protection. The estimates also reflect an important principle: Humanitarian protection is not only about offering safety in a moment of crisis; it is about helping people build their lives for the long term. That requires more than immigration pathways alone. It requires coordination, as I said earlier, with provinces and territories, municipalities, settlement organizations and community partners to help newcomers integrate successfully. It requires a lot of work. That is why our government continues to focus on building a controlled and sustainable system, a system that allows Canada to continue to offer protection over time while maintaining public confidence. Recent years have shown how quickly global crises can emerge and evolve. Canada has responded to a number of international displacement situations, each requiring a different set of tools and different operational responses. Those experiences have reinforced the importance of preparation and coordination. That is why IRCC has strengthened its crisis response framework, which helps guide how the department assesses emerging international crises and determines whether immigration measures may be part of Canada's response. It also helps ensure that decisions are thoughtful, consistent and sustainable. It considers humanitarian need alongside operational capacity, settlement supports, available space within the immigration levels plan and the ability of communities to support newcomers successfully. That matters because humanitarian responses cannot rely on improvising alone. They must be credible, they must be coordinated, and they must be built to endure. Canada's humanitarian tradition has always depended on partnerships. We rely on these groups, as I said earlier, and together with those partnerships, it allows Canada to remain a country that offers safety and stability to vulnerable people while maintaining confidence in the integrity of the system itself. The 2026-27 main estimates support that work. They support a refugee and humanitarian system that reflects Canadian values while recognizing the importance of responsible management, sustainability and long-term success. Canada will always continue to protect people in need. We will continue building an immigration system capable of upholding those commitments fairly, responsibly and sustainably into the future.

View on ourcommons.ca ↗

“Temporary foreign workers are needed to fill jobs Canadians can't or won't do. Employers must follow strict rules to hire them.”

“Employers must jump through hoops to prove they really need foreign workers. It's not my department's job to know the details.”

“I don't want to answer that. I will just say Canada has rules. Workers must follow them. Businesses must follow them. Many departments are involved. I think we manage it all very well.”

“I'm going to ignore your specific question and just keep repeating my talking points.”

“I want to say that we are working hard on this issue. We are talking to many important people. We will keep talking about it.”

“I'm filling time by saying I work with people. Conservatives like temporary foreign workers too.”

“My job is to sit here and make it sound like we're doing something.”

“I say nice things about some worker categories. That makes me look good.”

“I'm bragging about meeting union leaders. I want people to think I'm on their side. The real point is foreign workers are needed to fill empty jobs. Forget about the unemployed Canadians.”

“I'm filling time with kind words and saying nothing anyone could pin down later.”

“I don't want to answer that question. Instead I'll talk about how great our budget is for skilled trades.”

“I'm filling time with kind words and saying nothing anyone could pin down later.”

“I don't like that. I want to cheer for our government. We made a law. We checked those cases.”

“I'm going to ignore the actual question about the massive backlog of fraud investigations. Instead I'll keep talking about how there are fewer student visas overall as if that answers it. Maybe if I throw out some innuendo about my questioner's motives, people will get distracted from the issue.”

“I won't answer the question. I will list numbers to make me look good.”

“I'm saying lots of words without giving an answer that actually addresses your numbers. I want you to think I'm informed and responsible because I threw in a fact about a mandate and the PBO.”

“We're already doing a good job controlling foreign workers. I don't think we need to change anything.”

“I'm filling time with kind words and saying nothing anyone could pin down later.”