MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Pierre Poilievre

Follow by RSS

Poilievre seeks to lower fuel costs, repeal the clean fuel standard, and reverse government deficits he claims add $40,000 in debt per family. He critiques the Liberal government by suggesting leaders operate with self-serving intentions, famously stating that spending benefits “to his banker friends.” He often frames his arguments around the government’s failures.Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
A–
89 / 100 over 262 statements
Signal 80 / 100
Relevance 73 / 100
Respect 98 / 100
Clarity 96 / 100
Loses points more than most for Claiming to know a person’s bad motives.6.5 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×6.5 Mocking a person instead of answering their argument.6.1 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×6.1 Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.1.7 times as often as most members.What the tags mean ×1.7 Loses points less than most for A story that illustrates instead of making a point.Less often than most members.What the tags mean Thanks and tributes.Less often than most members.What the tags mean Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.Less often than most members.What the tags mean Averaged over the 262 of 275 statements graded so far.

Statements 275

Oral Questions ·

Oil and Gas Industry

“The ban on oil tankers forces us to sell our oil to the United States for $26 a barrel less than the world price. A company is ready to ship 250,000 barrels a day through Prince Rupert, but the Prime Minister's ban stops them. I want the government to vote for our bill to end this ban so we can sell our oil to world markets.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Liberal tanker ban is a gigantic multi-billion-dollar gift to Donald Trump’s America. Right now, we are getting a $26-a-barrel lower price in the U.S. than we could get on the world market, because we cannot get our oil overseas. What if there were a company with a railroad already in place, promising to move 250,000 barrels a day and ship it from Prince Rupert to get world prices through the Pacific? Well, it turns out there is one. What is standing in the way? It is the Prime Minister and his tanker ban. Will the Liberal government vote for Conservative Bill C-264 to get our oil to the world?

Oral Questions ·

Housing

“The minister wants to criticize people who blame high immigration numbers for the housing shortage. Yet his own report says immigration has driven up housing demand and caused this shortage. Will he criticize himself?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the member says he wants to reprimand anybody who blames excessive immigration numbers for the housing shortage. Well, let me read directly from a document he tabled in the House of Commons. It is a document on the housing shortage. It says, “One of the drivers of the housing shortage has been the strong growth in housing demand driven by immigration.” Will the minister stand up now and reprimand himself?

“The Prime Minister promised to double homebuilding, but the government now admits home construction will fall to near-record lows. I want the Prime Minister to stand up and answer for breaking his promise.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, a good leader stands up and answers questions in the House of Commons, and a good leader gets results. Now we learn that the government is admitting it will not get the Prime Minister’s promised results on housing. In a response to an Order Paper question, the Liberals have now admitted that the Prime Minister has broken his promise to double homebuilding and that construction will actually fall to near-record lows over the next three years, blaming immigration, as the Liberals do, for the housing shortage. How could the Prime Minister be so out of touch with Canadians who need homes?

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“The Prime Minister needs to answer for his record deficit. Paying interest on the national debt is the fastest-growing part of the budget, and it costs a family of four $6,000 this year. He needs to admit that our debt is out of control.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, if the Prime Minister had any results at all, he would stand up and answer questions about his record deficit and the fact that the fastest-growing item in the budget is not health care, not the military and not borders, but interest on the national debt, enriching his banker buddies at the expense of hard-working Canadians. The average family of four will spend $6,000 this year on taxes to fund interest on debt. Will he acknowledge that he is out of touch, that Canadians are out of money and that the debt is out of control?

“Inflation will bring the government twenty billion dollars, but regular Canadians are using food banks and cannot afford housing. The Prime Minister is still adding 733 billion dollars to the national debt over five years. That is 40,000 dollars for every family. I want him to admit he is out of touch and that Canadians are out of money.”
  • Opposition question in Question Period

    Signal 15 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, inflation is going to bring a $20-billion revenue windfall to the government. That is great news for the Prime Minister but terrible news for the people lined up at food banks and the young people who cannot afford a place to live. It is still not enough to offset the irresponsibility of the big-spending Prime Minister, who is going to add $733 billion to our national debt over five years according to the Parliamentary Budget Officer. That is $40,000 for every family in Canada. Will he acknowledge that he is out of touch and that Canadians are out of money?

“The Prime Minister gets no results. Ten European countries still have not signed our trade deal. He also wasted the extra money the government took in from inflation. The budget officer says he will add $733 billion to our debt over five years. That means $40,000 more debt for each Canadian family. He costs Canadians too much.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, there is no rapprochement happening. No agreements have been signed, either. Ten European countries have not signed the agreement we already have. There have been no results. The Prime Minister is all talk and no action. The same goes for spending. Inflation caused government revenues to skyrocket, but the Prime Minister squandered the money. The Parliamentary Budget Officer reports that he is planning to add $733 billion to our debt over the next five years, which amounts to an additional $40,000 in debt for every Canadian family. How can the Prime Minister be so out of touch and so costly for Canadians?

“We already have trade and military deals with Europe. The Prime Minister is giving up Canadian control by taking on expensive European rules for taxes, immigration, and regulations. This will not lower the cost of living, and it takes power away from the provinces without their consent.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we already have a free trade agreement with Europe and a military alliance with NATO and 30 European countries, but the Prime Minister is threatening to cede our sovereignty to costly European policies on taxes, immigration and regulations. This is not going to reduce the cost of living, and it is going to encroach on provincial premiers’ jurisdictions without their consent and without their input, including the Premier of Quebec on his own turf. How can the Prime Minister be so out of touch and so arrogant?

Government Orders ·

Business of Supply

In response to a question from Carol Anstey

“The Liberals ask what we would cut. We have found about $200 billion in savings. We would cancel the $150-billion Alto train project. We would end subsidies and loans to big corporations, including ones the Prime Minister has a personal interest in. We would end benefits for fake refugees and cut foreign aid. We want to cut this wasteful government spending and leave that money with Canadians.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Respect 77 of 100

    This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “that the Prime Minister has a personal interest in.”.

    See full analysis
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Liberals always ask, as if it were some kind of gotcha question, “What would we cut?” We have only found about $200 billion of savings that we have identified and stated publicly. To start with, there is the Alto rail disaster. The government wants to spend $150 billion on a train that is already off the tracks even though it has not built a single inch of rail. That is $150 billion right there. Massive increases in corporate welfare, which favours corporate power brokers with massive interest-free loans, grants, subsidies and other favours, would be reversed. This is companies such as Brookfield and others that the Prime Minister has a personal interest in. While he hides his money abroad, he mostly forces Canadians to subsidize his corporate interests here at home. We would get rid of the deluxe benefits for fake and phony refugees, who get more benefit from our tax dollars than our hard-working seniors do. We would cut back on foreign aid and stop sending our money out of Canada. It belongs to the Canadian people. We would bring it back to our people. I just came up with four or five excellent examples of how we could cut back the enormous, wasteful, morbidly obese government we have on the other side of the aisle, so Canadians can have a more rewarding life.

In response to a question from Mario Beaulieu

“The government spends more money paying interest on the debt than on health care. Six million Canadians do not have a family doctor, and wait times are getting worse. Canada should pay down its debt and spend that money on health care instead.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 45 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is true that the Liberal government spends more on servicing the debt than on health care. Conservatives believe that it should be the other way around. Canadians pay income tax and other taxes to get health care services. They deserve to have the best health care service in the world, but this is far from the case. Our current health care system includes 6 million people with no family doctor. The waiting lists keep getting longer. Within the OECD, we rank among the worst countries when it comes to health care services. One problem is that the Liberals are diverting money from our system to bankers to pay down the interest on our debt. We should pay down our debt and support health.

In response to a question from Kevin Lamoureux

“The government brags about promises it has not kept and investments that have not actually happened. Buzzwords and photo ops will not build the economy. The government needs to get out of the way so Canadians can reach their real potential.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the only thing broken is the record on the other side of the aisle. I have never heard any party so capable of bragging triumphantly of promises it has not yet kept. The member got up and did not say that the investment had occurred. He said that it has the potential to one day occur. Someday over the rainbow, if we just follow it, we might get to a pot of gold. We just need another summit, another signing ceremony, another photo op or a bunch of new made-up MBA isms, such as catalyze this and synergy that. We will not build an economy out of buzzwords or unrealized promises. We will build an economy by getting the government out of the way and off the backs of the Canadian people to realize their real potential.

“The government is spending sixty billion dollars this year just on interest on the national debt. That is more than it spends on health care, the military, or child benefits. It costs a family of four six thousand dollars a year, and that will soon rise to eight thousand. The Prime Minister is hiding the true deficit and plans to add hundreds of billions more in debt, which makes life unaffordable. I want the House to call the Prime Minister to a committee to explain this. I want all parties to support our plan to cut government spending and lower the deficit.”
  • A repeated line

    “After 11 years of the Liberal government.”

    Said 25 times by 19 members since April 30.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Canadians deserve more for their money. Hard work should be rewarded here in Canada. Those who get up every morning to go to work and those who are trying to retire after having worked hard their whole lives deserve a good paycheque. However, after 11 years of this Liberal government, the more time passes, the less work is rewarded. A larger share of wages in Canada is being eaten up by inflation. People even have to hand what they earn at work over to the government in the form of very high taxes. However, the government will argue that taxes pay for services. Is that true? Are the services we receive commensurate with the taxes that we pay? The fastest rising-cost under this government is not the cost of services, health care or benefits for children or seniors. It is the cost of the interest payments on our national debt, which will be $60 billion this year. That is more than the government is spending on health transfers, more than it is spending on services, more than the total amount Canadians pay in GST, twice as much as the government is spending on benefits for children and much more than it is spending on our soldiers. What does the interest on the national debt cost a family of four? Five years ago, a family of four had to pay about $2,500 a year in taxes to cover the interest on the national debt. Today, that same family must pay $6,000 in taxes simply to cover the interest on the debt. In four years’ time, that family will be paying $8,000 a year just to service the interest on the debt, not to pay down the debt itself. That makes debt interest the fastest-growing expenditure of all. At the same time, the Prime Minister’s record deficits are driving up the cost of living by fuelling inflation. The debt situation is far worse today than it was a year ago. Canadians were promised a Prime Minister who would be more prudent than Justin Trudeau, but instead he has doubled the deficits. He did so after resorting to creative accounting in the government’s books. According to the Parliamentary Budget Officer, this Prime Minister plans to add another $733 billion to the national debt over the next five years. That means an additional $40,000 in federal debt for every Canadian family and every household, on top of the $1.3 trillion already owed. Canadians are being crushed by the government’s debt. What are the consequences? More people are turning to food banks. An entire generation is being locked out of home ownership. Fuel prices at the pump are among the highest in the western world. Poverty is on the rise. That has to change. Canadians deserve better. The goal of the official opposition is to save them money, save their jobs, keep them safe, repair and reduce immigration, and put Canada first. That is why we are proposing to invite the Prime Minister to appear before the committee so that he can explain to Canadians how a family is going to pay $6,000 a year in interest on the national debt. It is also so that we can put forward our solutions, such as cutting down on red tape, consultants, corporate welfare, foreign aid, money for bogus refugees and more, in order to reduce the deficit and restore fiscal balance. The size of government must be reduced, along with the burden that government imposes on Canadians. We want to return to a country where everyone who works hard can have a big paycheque that stays in their pocket and where the dollar keeps its value. Greater purchasing power will enable our young people to buy a home, our families to buy food and our seniors to have the excellent retirement that they deserve. That is the Conservatives’ goal. For those reasons, we are calling on all parties to work with us to fulfill and restore the promise of Canada here, at home. Hard work should pay off. When someone puts in a long day’s work and bring home a paycheque, the money should stay in their pocket, and the dollars should retain value. The money should buy affordable food, homes and fuel. People should be able to put their kids in sporting activities that improve their health, their discipline and the quality of life they enjoy. They should be able to retire knowing that the money they saved up will buy them the necessities of life and allow them the freedom to enjoy the years they have earned. That means they should get value for money from the government. When people pay taxes, they expect something in return. Are they getting it? Well, what is the fastest-growing expense in the government’s budget? Is it seniors benefits? Is it health care? Is it the child benefit? Is it police? Is it our military? No, it is none of the above. Under the Prime Minister, for the first time in over two decades, the single biggest expense is interest on the national debt. It is an expense that has more than doubled in the last five years. Now, $60 billion of Canadian tax money goes to bankers and bondholders. That is more than we spend on health care transfers, more than we spend on the military and more than we spend on the child benefit. In fact, it is almost twice as much as we spend on the child benefit. Not only has it gotten worse; it threatens to get worse still. It is up from 10¢ to 13.6¢, almost 14¢, of every dollar the government spends that goes straight to bankers and bondholders for interest. This is the highest share of our budget since 2007. Here is what it means for the average family of four. In 2021, interest on the debt cost it $2,500 a year. Right now it is $6,000 a year, and in four years, under the government’s plan, it will be $8,000 a year. To put it in perspective, we are now spending vastly more on debt interest than we collect in GST. That is right: Every time we make a purchase at a retail outlet and we see that GST on the receipt, we should know that 100% of what we paid is not going to health care or our troops but is going to pay interest on the national debt. The situation, though, I have to say, is not as bad as it seems. It is worse, because the Prime Minister has cooked the books. He has decided that if he divides the debt and deficit up onto three separate credit cards, it will not cost as much. He says that some of the spending is operating cost. Some, he arbitrarily says, is investment. Further sums are for Crown corporations. At the end of the day, it is all money the government has to borrow and on which it has to pay future interest, all of which is a burden on the shoulders of taxpayers. To be clear, what the Prime Minister calls investment is fuzzy, undefined, and based on no generally accepted accounting principle. No other government in the world follows his definitions. It is simply what he picks in order to reduce what he calls his operating budget. Well, even with cooking the books, the Prime Minister has not managed to do that either. The Parliamentary Budget Officer reports that operating spending is up 11% in just over a year, rising well over three times faster than the growth in the population and the overall economy, and the Prime Minister intends to add $733 billion to our national debt over the next five years, according to the Parliamentary Budget Officer. This works out to $40,000 in new debt for every single family in this country, and to get what? It is bigger lineups at food banks, a generation of youth who cannot afford a home, higher insolvencies, jobs leaving our country and our brightest people moving south. It the biggest increase of any country in the world of people exiting to go to the United States of America. It is “elbows up, Canadians out”. That is a bad result for all those hundreds of billions of dollars of deficit spending. There is a better way. We could restore the value of hard work by cutting bureaucracy, consultants, foreign aid, handouts to fake and phony refugees, and other wasted money in order to bring down debt, inflation and taxes; to make our money worth something; to ensure that our dollars are spent on health care, military, policing and borders, not on bankers and bondholders; and to restore the promise of this country, where anyone who works hard gets a great life on a safe street in a home they own, with meat and potatoes on the dinner table and a wonderful retirement under our proud flag. Let us make it happen.

Oral Questions ·

Finance

“Debt interest is the fastest-growing cost in the budget, and it does not pay for any public services. A family of four pays $6,000 in taxes just for debt interest today, and that will rise to $8,000 in four years. I want the Prime Minister to come to the finance committee and explain this cost.”
  • Opposition question in Question Period

    Respect 66 of 100

    This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “to his banker friends”.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, debt interest is the fastest-growing item on this government’s budget. It does not buy a single doctor, a single soldier or a single protection at our border. Here is what this rising cost means for a family of four. Five years ago, it was $2,400 in interest on the debt for that family. Right now, it is $6,000, and in four years, it will be $8,000 in taxes paid not to get any services but just to pay the bankers. Will the Prime Minister come to the finance committee and tell that family where they are going to get $8,000 for interest to his banker friends?

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“The Liberal government is hurting the economy by borrowing too much money. Interest on the debt is the fastest-growing cost in the budget. It costs a family of four $6,000 in taxes that does not go to health care or the military. Families cannot afford this when they already cannot afford food.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is the Liberal government that is driving the Canadian economy down. It is doing it with credit card debt, and the interest on it is not free. It comes with interest. What is the biggest expense in this Liberal budget? Is it health care? Is it seniors? No, the fastest-growing expense is interest on the debt. The average family of four will spend $6,000 on federal taxes just for the debt, not for health care and not for our military. How does the Prime Minister expect a family to spend $6,000 when they cannot afford groceries?

“The government is hiding how much money it borrows by splitting its debt into three different categories. No matter what the Prime Minister calls it, Canadians still have to pay the interest. I want him to understand that basic lesson.”
  • Opposition question in Question Period

    Clarity 41 of 100

    Much of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the finance minister is absolutely right that Canadians are very educated. They are educated enough to know that the government is cooking the books. The Prime Minister is dividing his deficits on three credit cards. One he calls operational spending, another he claims is investment and a third goes to Crown corporations. However, Canadians understand that just because the Liberals put their debt on three different credit cards does not mean they do not have to pay the interest. Given that Canadians understand that, when will the Prime Minister get this basic financial lesson?

“The government plans to add $730 billion to the national debt over the next five years. That is $40,000 for every Canadian. This spending causes higher food and housing costs while helping bankers and big corporations. How does the Prime Minister expect Canadians to pay for this?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Liberal Prime Minister is out of touch, Canadians are out of money and the debt is out of control. More inflation is on the horizon as the Parliamentary Budget Officer calculated that the government is expected to add $730 billion to our national debt over the next five years. That is three-quarters of a trillion dollars more on the national credit card, working out to $40,000 in debt for every single Canadian. That is more handouts to corporate power brokers, more interest to bankers, and more food and housing inflation for Canadians. How does he expect them to pay this bill?

“Liberal programs are not working, and more people need free meals. The Prime Minister is going to add $730 billion to our debt. This will make life more expensive and cost a family of four $6,000 a year in interest. Canadians should not have to pay for this debt instead of feeding their families.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, all of these inflationary Liberal programs are not working for the 400 people who were in need of a hot meal. It is not just the demand for hot meals that is skyrocketing. The Liberals’ inflationary debt is too. According to a report by the Parliamentary Budget Officer, the Prime Minister is going to add $730 billion to our debt. That is going to drive up the cost of living. It is going to cost a family of four $6,000 in interest a year. Why must Canadians feed the Liberal debt instead of feeding their families?

“More people need free meals from charities now than ten years ago. The Prime Minister is still planning to add $730 billion in debt, which will drive up prices even more. Canadians should not have to pay more for government debt than for their own food.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, demand is soaring. Le Journal de Québec reported that a charity called Le Marginal served 400 meals in a single evening. That is five times more than 10 years ago. However, it seems that the Prime Minister has learned nothing. He is still forecasting $730 billion of inflationary debt within five years, which will further fuel inflation. Why are Canadians being asked to pay more for his debt than for the food they put on their tables?

Oral Questions ·

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship

“The government broke the immigration system and let corporations use immigrants to lower wages and raise rents. Provinces pay for the health care, housing, and services newcomers need. I want the government to give Alberta, Quebec, and other provinces more control over immigration so they can protect these services.”
  • Opposition question in Question Period

    Signal 37 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, if anyone should be apologizing to immigrants, it is the Liberal government, for completely destroying the system and allowing corporate power brokers to use vulnerable immigrants to drive wages down and rents up. Provinces must deliver the services related to newcomers: health care, jobs and housing. However, the Prime Minister wants to concentrate all the power in his hands, where he has let the system run out of control. Why not allow Alberta, Quebec and the other provinces more control so they can ensure that we protect health care, housing and jobs for all Canadians?

“Immigrants are not to blame for our broken immigration system. The Liberal government is. Asylum backlogs are up 2,500 percent, and temporary residents are up 260 percent. The government has lost track of 300,000 people. If the Prime Minister cannot count who is already here, he should not claim we need more immigration.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, immigrants themselves are not to blame. They are hard-working, law-abiding and decent people. What is to blame is the Liberal government, which has destroyed the system. The asylum claim backlog is up 2,500% since the government took office. Temporary foreign worker permits are up 135%. The number of temporary residents is up 260%. The Liberals have lost track of 300,000 people. If the Prime Minister cannot even keep count of the number of people here, how can he claim that we need to bring more immigration in?

“The Liberals have lost control of immigration. In June, the Prime Minister said our population went down, but official numbers show Canada actually has 300,000 more people than he said. He should not be calling for more immigration when he cannot even count how many people are already here.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Liberals have sent immigration out of control. We now learn that the Prime Minister cannot even keep track of the number of people here in the country. In June, he claimed that the population had gone down, but then Statistics Canada said this month that there are 300,000 more people in Canada than the Prime Minister had said. How can the Prime Minister tell The New York Times that we need an increase in immigration, when he cannot even keep track of the number of people already here?