Adjournment Proceedings

In adjournment proceedings, Conservative MP Grant Jackson pressed the government on food affordability and food production, saying Canada should grow more food to lower grocery prices. Parliamentary Secretary Jennifer McKelvie replied that affordability is a priority and pointed to measures including a cut to greenhouse growers’ taxes, more time for first-time homebuyers to repay Home Buyers’ Plan withdrawals, and a lower Canada Pension Plan contribution rate, and later said the government is developing a national food security strategy. Jackson responded that his question about food production had not been addressed and said the government lacks a plan in that area.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

4 statements

Grant Jackson, Brandon—Souris

Conservative
“I want the government to answer my question. What is it doing to help Canada grow more food? Growing more food will lower grocery prices, but people in farming areas like mine still cannot afford to eat.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, it is a pleasure to rise today. Last week, I asked the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food about the sorry state of food affordability in Canada and what exactly the government was doing to increase food production in this country. It makes sense to me that if we grow more and produce more food, the price of food should come down. It is not impacted by tariffs that we have seen, nor by inclement weather in other parts of the world, which often affects prices in this country. Unfortunately, the response I got was anything but an answer. The Minister of Agriculture went on to list a whole bunch of programs that have nothing whatsoever to do with food production or increasing it in this country. Therefore, I would like to give the member across the way another crack at the same question. What exactly is the government doing to increase food production in Canada, and when will the Liberals finally recognize that when regions like mine that grow the food cannot even afford to buy it, the rest of the country is certainly in crisis?

Jennifer McKelvie, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Housing and Infrastructure

Liberal
“I want the House to pass this bill to make life cheaper for Canadians. It cuts taxes for greenhouse growers, gives first-time homebuyers more time to pay back their retirement savings, and lowers the Canada Pension Plan contribution rate.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, our government is relentless in its efforts to make life more affordable for Canadians. Many hard-working Canadians continue to face affordability pressures as the cost of essential goods, housing and everyday expenses remains high. This is why our actions have been focused on ensuring Canadians keep more of their hard-earned money in their pockets. The spring economic update, “Canada Strong for All”, which our government delivered on April 28, includes the next steps toward meeting our objective of building a stronger, more resilient and more affordable country. We recently introduced Bill C-30, an act to implement certain provisions of the spring economic update tabled in Parliament on April 28. It is a key piece of legislation to help ease the sting of higher prices. Let us begin with the rising cost of food, which is a major concern for Canadians. On June 5, more than 12 million Canadians will receive additional support through the new Canada groceries and essentials benefit. The spring economic update, via Bill C-30, is proposing additional measures to support Canadians even more as they deal with the financial squeeze of food bills. The passage of Bill C-30 would help growers supercharge domestic food production in Canada with tax changes that would allow the immediate expensing of greenhouse buildings. The measure is projected to provide $41 million of tax relief over six years. The government is also committed to developing a national food security strategy. The strategy would make it easier for Canadians to access affordable and nutritious food and build Canada’s resilience and capacity to meet domestic needs. Bill C-30 would amend the Canadian Food Inspection Agency Act and the Pest Control Products Act to include the consideration of food security and the cost of food. Bill C-30 also promises to help address housing affordability concerns. It is clear: The high cost of housing is putting significant pressure on household budgets, especially for younger Canadians. Our government recognizes that many Canadians who have recently purchased their first home or are planning to do so could benefit from a boost to their cash flow. That is why Bill C-30 proposes extending the grace period during which homebuyers are not required to start repaying their homebuyers’ plan withdrawals from their RRSPs. The proposed extension is from two years to five years. This change would deliver cash flow relief of up to $4,000 per individual per year over three years, during which time they would not be required to repay the amount into their RRSP. There is more in Bill C-30. The legislation proposes an important change to the Canada pension plan to ensure Canadians keep more of their money in their bank accounts. The CPP is the cornerstone of Canada’s retirement income system, providing stable and predictable pension income to millions of Canadians. To help address affordability pressures faced by so many households, Canada’s ministers of finance unanimously agreed in April to reduce the contribution rate for the CPP. The change would lower the contribution rate in the base CPP from 9.9% to 9.5%, effectively January 1, 2027. This 40-basis points reduction to the CPP contribution rate would translate into annual savings of up to $133 for an employee earning $70,000 a year, with equivalent savings for their employer. The change would do this while ensuring the long-term sustainability of the CPP. As members can see, our government is moving swiftly to improve affordability. We have already accomplished so much, and these are only the latest examples of how we are working hard to lift some of the barriers off Canadians.

Grant Jackson, Brandon—Souris

Conservative
“The Liberals did not answer my question about food production. Canada needs to grow more food to lower prices at home and feed people around the world. The government has no plan to do this.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, that is pretty much par for the course with the Liberal government, unfortunately. The question was specifically about food production, and I am not sure the Liberal member across the way used the two-word phrase “food production” at any point in that entire answer, which is par for the course, even more sadly, for the agriculture minister in responding to my questions during question period. He and his parliamentary secretary are clearly too busy tonight to answer these questions. It is an important measure that we need to be addressing because this country needs to grow more food to meet our domestic needs, to bring prices down for Canadians, as well as to continue to feed the world, which so many people from my region and across the Prairies do. It is very disappointing that the Liberals have no plan to increase food production in Canada.

Jennifer McKelvie, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Housing and Infrastructure

Liberal

Linked statement

“High prices are a big problem for Canadians. We are working on a national food plan to help people get healthy, affordable food.”
  • Reply to a comment in debate

    Clarity 36 of 100

    Much of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, we know affordability is the single most pressing issue for many Canadians. The government is committed to developing a national food security strategy. This strategy would make it easier for Canadians to access affordable and nutritious food, and build on Canada’s resilience and capacity to meet domestic needs. From the beginning, we have placed people and affordability at the centre of our economic plan because we know the pressures are real and demand immediate action. We believe in a Canada for all.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 114

  1. Government Orders Business of Supply 86 statements
  2. Government Orders Business of Supply 29 statements
  3. Oral Questions Finance 12 statements
  4. Oral Questions Oil and Gas Industry 6 statements
  5. Oral Questions Finance 15 statements
  6. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions Finance 11 statements
  8. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Finance 19 statements
  10. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 6 statements
  12. Oral Questions Youth 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Air Transportation 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Mental Health and Addictions 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Business of the House 2 statements
  17. Government Orders Business of Supply 53 statements
  18. Private Members' Business National Framework on the Durability of Electronic Products and Essential Home Appliances Act 13 statements
  19. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  20. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  21. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements