Translate Politics Parliament in plain language.

Business of Supply

The House debated a Conservative supply motion calling on the government to remove all federal taxes on gasoline and diesel, including the GST, for the rest of the year and to permanently end the clean fuel standard, arguing that fuel and grocery costs are too high and that the government’s temporary fuel tax cut is not enough. Conservative members said high fuel taxes raise the price of everything, cited constituents struggling with costs, and said rural drivers would benefit most from relief. Liberal members replied that the government is already helping with affordability, citing the temporary fuel tax cut, the grocery benefit, income tax reductions, housing measures and the school food program, and said the Conservatives have voted against such measures. Bloc Québécois members said they would oppose the motion, arguing that cutting fuel taxes mainly benefits wealthy people and oil companies, would add billions to the deficit, and questioning the Conservatives’ deficit stance; a Bloc member also raised Quebec’s loss related to carbon tax rebate payments.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text

64 statements

Carlos Leitão

Liberal

Linked statement

“I want to ask my colleague if he thinks the Conservatives would cut pensions and income support for seniors. Those programs cost about $85 billion.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, talking about seniors, that is exactly what I would like to ask my colleague about, because we do have in Canada the program of old age security and the guaranteed income supplement. Together we are talking about something like $85 billion. Does my colleague think that the new, right Conservatives would probably put an axe to those programs?

View on ourcommons.ca Grade A View analysis

Kevin Lamoureux

Liberal
“The Conservatives raised the retirement age and did nothing to help public pensions. The Liberals lowered the retirement age back down and increased pension payments for seniors.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I was here when the current leader of the Conservative Party worked with Stephen Harper. They raised OAS eligibility from age 65 to 67, and they did absolutely nothing on the CPP file for over a decade. It took Liberal administrations to not only reverse the 65 to 67 but also get an increase to CPP. We have also had ongoing support in terms of increases to the GIS and the OAS for our seniors.

View on ourcommons.ca Grade A+ View analysis

Gabriel Ste-Marie

Bloc Québécois
“The Conservatives are not a far-right party. We should not call them that here. The Liberals have adopted many of the Conservatives' economic ideas, like cutting taxes and supporting oil. If the Conservatives are far right, then the Liberals are too.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the hon. parliamentary secretary kept repeating throughout his speech that the Conservatives are members of a far right party. I think we need to be very careful and cautious with our words. By repeating this over and over again, we end up diminishing the weight of those words. Even though I do not share the values of Conservative members, I believe that the Conservative Party is clearly not a far right party, and one should never say that in the House. I believe there is a world of difference between the policies it advocates and what is being done in the United States under the current presidency, for example. Furthermore, when we look at economic policies, we see that the Liberal government has essentially adopted all the Conservatives’ ideas: tax cuts, unconditional support for oil development, and even the reduction in gas taxes being advocated today. The Liberals did this a month and a half ago. Is the parliamentary secretary saying, then, that the Liberals themselves are members of a far right party?

View on ourcommons.ca Grade A+ View analysis

Kevin Lamoureux

Liberal
“Our government works hard for all Canadians. We are growing the economy, protecting the environment, and building better relations with Indigenous people at the same time.”

  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 45 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis

  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 0 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I would suggest that under this Prime Minister, we have seen a government that has recognized the value of building a strong Canada for all Canadians, to make it stronger and healthier. That is what those policies, as they have unfolded, have directed. We understand the importance of the economy, the environment and indigenous people, bringing them all together, knowing full well that we can work in collaboration and have a good environment, a good economy and better relations with indigenous people as we grow through things such as the major projects and export opportunities. It is an aggressive agenda that this Prime Minister and every Liberal member of Parliament has, to be there for Canadians.

View on ourcommons.ca Grade F View analysis

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 122

All 46 items ·
  1. Government Orders Business of Supply 64 statements
  2. Government Orders Business of Supply 45 statements
  3. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions Taxation 4 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  6. Oral Questions Justice 6 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 16 statements
  8. Oral Questions The Environment 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions Finance 6 statements
  10. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 10 statements
  11. Oral Questions Public Safety 8 statements
  12. Oral Questions Women and Gender Equality 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 6 statements
  14. Oral Questions Natural Resources 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions The Environment 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Business of the House 2 statements
  19. Government Orders Government Orders 2 statements
  20. Oral Questions Taxation 4 statements
  21. Oral Questions Emergency Management 3 statements
  22. Government Orders Business of Supply 15 statements
  23. Government Orders Business of Supply 15 statements
  24. Government Orders Business of Supply 27 statements
  25. Private Members' Business An Act to repeal certain restrictions on shipping 12 statements
  26. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  27. Government Orders Business of Supply 366 statements
  28. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements