Public Services and Procurement

In question period on public services and procurement, the Conservative leader asked repeatedly about a Canada Revenue Agency contract for security guard services. He said the government promised to buy Canadian but increased purchases from U.S. companies by $7.8 billion in its first year, and that the contract replaces the Commissionaires, the largest employer of veterans in Canada, with an American company. Liberal ministers replied that the CRA followed a fair and open procurement process and selected a registered Canadian business headquartered in Ontario that employs thousands of Canadians, and said the government supports veteran employment through its national veterans employment strategy. The Conservatives also said the government was claiming it had no control over the purchasing decision.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

7 statements

Pierre Poilievre, Leader of the Opposition

Conservative
“The Prime Minister promised to buy Canadian, but he bought billions more from the United States. Now he is replacing Canadian veterans with an American company to save only one percent. Why is he choosing an American company over our veterans?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister made big promises that he was going to buy Canadian. However, in his first year in office, he increased U.S. purchases by $7.8 billion. This week, we learned that he cast aside the Commissionaires, the single largest employer of veterans in Canada, in favour of an American company, to save just 1%. That company is linked to ICE and Donald Trump. Why is the Prime Minister casting our veterans aside to favour an American company?

Peter Fragiskatos, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship

Liberal
“The Conservatives cut services for veterans when they were in power. This purchasing decision was made through an open and clear process, and the member should keep that in mind.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Signal 22 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the member raises the question of veterans, ultimately. I would remind him of the Conservative record on veterans and the endless cuts we saw under Conservative leadership. We can leave that aside for a moment. The decision, as articulated yesterday, was taken through a transparent and open process. I leave that to the member to consider.

Pierre Poilievre, Leader of the Opposition

Conservative
“The Prime Minister promised to buy Canadian. Instead, he spent $7.8 billion more on American companies in his first year. Now he is replacing the Commissionaires, Canada's largest employer of veterans, with an American security firm. Why did he break his promise and choose an American company over Canadian veterans?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister made big promises that he was going to buy Canadian. Then we learned that in his first year in office, he spent $7.8 billion more than the previous year on American companies, with Canadian tax dollars. This week, we learned that he cast aside the Commissionaires, the single largest employer of veterans in Canada, to favour an American security firm linked to Donald Trump and ICE. Why did the Prime Minister, after making his big promise, cast aside our veterans to favour an American firm at Canadians’ expense?

Jill McKnight, Minister of Veterans Affairs and Associate Minister of National Defence

Liberal

Linked statement

“The tax agency used a fair and open process to hire security guards. It chose a registered Canadian company.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, let me be clear. As highlighted yesterday by the Secretary of State for the Canada Revenue Agency, the CRA followed a fair and open procurement process for guard services. It selected a registered Canadian— Some hon. members: Oh, oh!

Jill McKnight, Minister of Veterans Affairs and Associate Minister of National Defence

Liberal
“The tax agency followed a fair, open process to hire security guards. It picked an Ontario business that employs thousands of Canadians. Our government supports Canadian workers and businesses.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this answer, 100% addressed the question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, let me be clear. As highlighted yesterday by the Secretary of State for the Canada Revenue Agency, the CRA followed a fair and open procurement process for guard services. It selected a registered Canadian business headquartered in Ontario that employs thousands of Canadians. Our government will always stand with Canadian workers and Canadian businesses as we build the strongest economy in the G7.

Pierre Poilievre, Leader of the Opposition

Conservative
“The Prime Minister promised our tax money would go to Canadian businesses, especially Canadian veterans. Instead, the government spent this money on an American company and claims it had no control over the decision. Why did the Liberals choose an American company over Canadian veterans?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Liberals promised elbows up, and instead, they elbowed aside our veterans. Now their excuse is that they cannot control any of it, that all these billions of dollars for purchases are going out the door and the elected government has no authority to do anything about it at all, that this is just a bunch of self-determining bureaucrats. That is not what the Prime Minister promised. He said he was going to ensure that our Canadian tax dollars went to Canadian firms. At the front of that list should have been Canadian veterans. The Commissionaires should be protecting us. Why did the Liberals favour an American firm instead of Canadian veterans?

Jill McKnight, Minister of Veterans Affairs and Associate Minister of National Defence

Liberal
“The CRA followed a fair and open process to award this contract, and they made the choice on their own. We still support hiring veterans and will keep working with employers who hire them.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, as I just said, the CRA followed a fair and open procurement process. I, of course, share the view that veterans have the right opportunities to find rewarding employment of their choosing when they are ready. It is at the core of the national veterans employment strategy. Again, as has been stated, this was a contract decision made by the CRA. Our government has worked and will continue to work with veteran employers as we build the strongest economy in the G7.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 152

  1. Oral Questions The Economy 11 statements
  2. Oral Questions Government Priorities 4 statements
  3. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  4. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 7 statements
  5. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 3 statements
  6. Oral Questions The Economy 8 statements
  7. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 2 statements
  8. Oral Questions Housing 11 statements
  9. Oral Questions Immigration 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Natural Resources 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Public Safety 6 statements
  12. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Air Transportation 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Labour 6 statements
  15. Oral Questions Justice 2 statements
  16. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 47 statements
  17. Oral Questions The Economy 11 statements
  18. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  19. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  20. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  21. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  22. Private Members' Business Georgina's Law 11 statements