Public Services and Procurement

During question period on public services and procurement, the Bloc Québécois asked about cost overruns on the Cúram government software project, which it said has risen to nearly $7 billion and which makes it harder for seniors to get their pensions; the Bloc said the new Liberal majority was refusing to release related documents and used its majority in committee to block information, and pointed to $451 million added for Cúram in the economic update. The Liberal parliamentary secretary replied that the government has been open about the project, noting $1.8 billion invested against a $4.8 billion budget, that the old age security modernization phase came in under budget, and that the system administers OAS, EI and the CPP, with the first phase proceeding as planned and later phases still to come.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

4 statements

Mario Simard, Jonquière

Bloc Québécois
“The Liberals are hiding documents about government software that now costs nearly $7 billion. This bad software makes it hard for seniors to get their pensions. I want to know if the government will keep hiding information like this.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, yesterday, the first thing the Liberals did with their new majority was refuse to release the documents on the Cúram software cost overruns. While costs have risen to nearly $7 billion, the Liberals are using their majority to hide the truth from the opposition and the public. Tens of thousands of seniors are struggling to get their old age pension, but the Liberals refuse to let us address the root of the problem. Is that what we can expect from the next three years of a Liberal majority government?

Leslie Church, Parliamentary Secretary to the Secretaries of State for Labour, for Seniors, and for Children and Youth, and to the Minister of Jobs and Families (Persons with Disabilities)

Liberal

Linked statement

“We are being open about this project. We have spent 1.8 billion dollars out of our 4.8-billion-dollar budget. We finished modernizing old age security under budget, using only 633 million of the 674 million dollars set aside for it. The budget changes because updating a 60-year-old system is big and complicated.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this answer, 100% addressed the question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, we have been very open and clear about this project. I will be clear. On a total budget of $4.8 billion, $1.8 billion has been invested. In fact, the modernization of old age security was delivered under budget. Of the $674 million allocated for this phase, only $633 million was required, reflecting strong project oversight and effective cost management. As the project evolves, so does the budget, reflecting the scale and complexity of modernizing a 60‑year‑old, obsolete system. This has been transparently communicated—

Mario Simard, Jonquière

Bloc Québécois
“The government added $451 million for Cúram, but they keep saying it is on budget. They are using their majority in committee to hide the truth. They need to be accountable.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I cannot believe what I just heard. The Liberals know there are problems with Cúram, because they added $451 million for Cúram and the CRA in the economic update. It is absurd for them to claim that there are no cost overruns when they added $451 million in cost overruns in the update. Meanwhile, they are using their majority in committee to hide information. Yesterday, the minister repeated that Cúram is on budget. Do the Liberals understand that having a majority does not absolve them from being accountable to Quebeckers?

Leslie Church, Parliamentary Secretary to the Secretaries of State for Labour, for Seniors, and for Children and Youth, and to the Minister of Jobs and Families (Persons with Disabilities)

Liberal
“This project runs our main public benefit programs. The first part is going as planned, and the next parts are still to come. It is an important project that must continue.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this answer, 100% addressed the question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, as the member knows, this system administers our main benefit programs, namely OAS, EI and the CPP. The first phase of the project is proceeding as planned. The project’s other phases are still to come. This is a necessary and ongoing project.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 115

  1. Government Orders Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act 29 statements
  2. Oral Questions Finance 12 statements
  3. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions Small Business 2 statements
  5. Oral Questions Finance 14 statements
  6. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 5 statements
  8. Oral Questions Industry 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Finance 18 statements
  11. Oral Questions Sport 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Health 6 statements
  13. Oral Questions Climate Change 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Climate Change 2 statements
  17. Government Orders Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act 20 statements
  18. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 4 statements
  19. Government Orders Privilege 2 statements
  20. Private Members' Business Offender Rehabilitation Act 14 statements
  21. Government Orders Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act 21 statements