“I want Parliament to approve our spending plan. It cuts day-to-day government costs and shrinks the public service so we can spend more on defence, housing, and infrastructure.”

“moved: That Vote 5, in the amount of $17,968,133,395, under Department of National Defence — Capital expenditures, in the Main Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2027, be concurred in. He said: Mr. Speaker, I will be sharing my time with the hon. member for Halifax. I am thankful for the opportunity to speak about the government’s spending priorities for the 2026‑27 fiscal year as set out in the main estimates. The main estimates outline the funding and resources departments require to deliver the programs and services Canadians rely on. Parliament must authorize these expenditures before the government can legally spend public funds. To further strengthen accountability and scrutiny, parliamentary committees have the opportunity to hear from and question ministers and officials to determine whether proposed spending aligns with key government priorities. Canadians can also see how the government intends to use their tax dollars. The amounts listed in the main estimates are reflected in appropriation acts, also known as supply bills. Once passed, these acts give the government the legal authority to spend. With respect to main estimates 2026‑27, I would like to point to budget 2025 as the context for these spending requests. As the budget made clear, the government is committed to strong fiscal management. This means spending less on operations so that we can invest more in building Canada strong. Since the budget was tabled in the fall, rather than in the spring, as in previous years, there has been greater opportunity to align the main estimates with budget decisions. As a result, the 2026‑27 main estimates reflect $14.7 billion in new spending announced in budget 2025, including in key areas like defence, infrastructure and housing. Measures that are still under development will be presented through future supplementary estimates. As I mentioned, making investments in priority areas means that the government is spending less and investing more to build the strongest economy in the G7. As such, the spending outlined in these main estimates also reflects some of the savings resulting from Canada’s new government’s comprehensive expenditure review. Last year, we made a clear commitment to spend less on government operations so that we can invest more in the workers, businesses and nation-building infrastructure that will grow our economy and strengthen this country. The comprehensive expenditure review launched in July was essential in meeting this commitment to responsible, cost-effective spending that delivers results for Canadians. The review required federal organizations to bring forward savings proposals to spend less on the day-to-day running of the government. It targeted programs and activities that were not core to their federal mandate, were duplicative or were not aligned with the government’s priorities. Organizations also considered ways to work more efficiently, leveraging existing and emerging technologies, like artificial intelligence, where they can make the government more effective and efficient. Some of the results of this review were presented in the budget, and savings of $13 billion annually by 2028‑29 were identified across departments. This includes bringing the public service back to a sustainable level, including through a reduction in the size of public service by an estimated 16,000 full-time equivalents. The government understands the scope of the review. That is why the reductions are being managed with fairness and compassion, relying on attrition and voluntary departures to the greatest extent possible. The government remains committed to supporting impacted public servants with compassion and transparency. I would also like to take this opportunity to thank our public servants for their dedication and commitment in delivering services to Canadians. We are also leveraging all available tools to limit involuntary departures, including the early retirement incentive. The early retirement incentive provides an opportunity for eligible employees to retire without a penalty for early departure. Around 7,000 employees have already applied to the program. The government’s departmental plans tabled in March provide more details on the review and how financial resources will be used to achieve planned results. Before getting into the details of the main estimates, I would like to speak about the financial reporting cycle and why it is so important. I have already mentioned the purpose of the main estimates, but not all funding requirements appear in the main estimates, so the government also introduces supplementary estimates throughout the year. Supplementary estimates may include funding for new initiatives, urgent needs, such as disaster responses, or items that were not ready in time to be included in the main estimates. These documents are tabled at different points throughout the fiscal year: supplementary estimates (A) in the spring, supplementary estimates (B) in the fall and supplementary estimates (C) in the winter, if required. Taken together, the supplementary estimates and the mains are part of the estimates family of documents. This estimates family of documents also includes departmental plans, which set out priorities of federal organizations, and departmental results reports, which show how departments performed and help Canadians assess how effectively their tax dollars were used. Another significant document in this fiscal cycle is the public accounts. While the estimates outline planned spending, the public accounts provide the audited, consolidated financial statements of the Government of Canada for each fiscal year ending March 31. They detail how the funds were actually spent and how the revenue was collected. The government is well aware of how important transparency and accountability are to Canadians. That is why we continue to prioritize the way the estimates are presented. Extensive explanatory documentation is readily accessible online to parliamentarians and Canadians. Online platform tools used for this purpose in GC InfoBase present the main estimates and the supplementary estimates, along with other data related to government finances, people and results.”

“The world is facing big challenges right now. Our Prime Minister and government are working with other countries and all levels of government to take bold action and make Canada strong.”

“Mr. Speaker, as we know, we are going through global instability and global challenges. This is the moment we need to seize. Our new government, under the leadership of our Prime Minister, one of the greatest prime ministers, is bringing nations together, moving forward to take bold actions and delivering results. It is great to see all levels of government working together, moving on, sharing priorities and building Canada strong.”

• Off topic
  ?

  Reply to a debate question

  Relevance 0 of 100

  None of this statement addressed the specific topic under debate.

  See full analysis →
• Little substance
  ?

  Reply to a debate question

  Signal 43 of 100

  Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

  See full analysis →

“Our government is focused on what matters most to Canadians. Our actions helped add almost 90,000 jobs and lower unemployment. We are working to build the strongest economy in the G7.”

“Mr. Speaker, the new government is focused on investing in core priorities that matter most to Canadians and taking bold actions. It is because of those actions that we see, as we saw last Friday, a report that almost 90,000 jobs were added to the Canadian labour force, and that unemployment has dropped. There are measures the government is taking to build the strongest economy in the G7 and to focus on delivering results for Canadians.”

• Didn't answer
  ?

  Reply to a debate question

  Relevance 47 of 100

  None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

  See full analysis →
• Little substance
  ?

  Reply to a debate question

  Signal 40 of 100

  Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

  See full analysis →

“I want to know how our strong economic growth and foreign investment will affect the government's future spending plans.”

“Mr. Speaker, I am interested to understand how the positive indicators we are starting to see, in terms of the biggest growth in the G7, highest per capita foreign investment and things like this, are going to impact the estimates going forward.”

“Our spending plans are online in an open database so people can see how public money is used. I want members to look at this tool. The government plans to spend $502.8 billion on 130 public services and programs.”

“Mr. Speaker, the main estimates and supplementary estimates, along with other data related to government finances, are published in the expenditure database, a digital tool, which people can consult. This is key to giving parliamentarians and Canadians more information on how public funds are being spent. I encourage my hon. colleagues who have not already done so to consult this great tool. Main estimates represents a total of $502.8 billion in budgetary spending for 130 organizations to deliver programs and services that Canadians rely on—”

“I want the House to approve this spending plan. The world is becoming more dangerous, and Canada must be able to defend itself. This plan gives the Department of National Defence $50.7 billion to pay troops better, recruit more soldiers, and buy new ships and equipment.”

“Mr. Speaker, the global security environment today is volatile and uncertain. We face real challenges, both military and non-military, that demand an equally strong and coordinated response. Canada must be prepared to defend ourselves and our allies. Our government has announced the most ambitious defence rebuild in a generation. Today, with the 2026-27 main estimates, we are putting the money behind that commitment. I am really pleased to stand in the House to talk about this today, representing my riding of Halifax. Halifax is home to the largest defence base in the country. CFB Halifax, in one form or another, has existed since the 18th century, predating Canada as we know it. The military and our armed forces members are ingrained in our history and are already shaping our future. Our city is advancing incredible projects for the Canadian Armed Forces. We are building the River class destroyers and we are home to NATO DIANA and the Maritime DISH. As we prepare our next big defence procurement with the new fleet of submarines, there is even more possibility for Halifax. The government is requesting $50.7 billion for the Department of National Defence. That is $15 billion more than the previous year, or a 42% increase in funding. That includes $5.1 billion in new operating funding, $7.1 billion in capital and $2.3 billion in grants and contributions. These are not abstract numbers. They represent real capabilities and real investments in real people: the personnel who wear the uniform and defend this country every day. Last year, Canada hit 2% of GDP on defence for the first time since the fall of the Berlin Wall, half a decade ahead of schedule. Reaching the 2% benchmark is a foundational step in renewing Canada’s defence and a clear statement of resolve in a more dangerous world. We are now working toward NATO’s new defence investment pledge: 3.5% of GDP for core defence and 1.5% for broader defence and security infrastructure, for a total commitment of 5% of GDP by 2035. As the Prime Minister noted at CANSEC, Canada is already meeting that 1.5% target for critical defence infrastructure. These estimates keep that momentum going. Canada’s new government is delivering on its promise to make generational investments in the women and men of the Canadian Armed Forces and to further accelerate these investments in the years to come. In a more dangerous and divided world, Canada is taking full responsibility for defending our sovereignty and building our strength as a reliable partner and ally. Our government made a promise to rebuild, rearm and reinvest in the Canadian Armed Forces, and we are getting it done. A military is only as strong as its people, and this government has made clear that our people in uniform deserve to be treated accordingly. The $1.3 billion in these estimates reflects the historic pay increase we delivered for CAF members; the largest in a generation. Better pay means better recruitment. It means better retention and a more capable and more ready force. The results are already showing. CAF recruitment is the highest it has been in three decades. Last fiscal year, we surpassed our recruitment goals, bringing in over 6,700 new regular force members. We are also investing $274.9 million in CAF recruitment and training to modernize how we attract and develop the next generation of service members. We are building a more robust recruiting and training system, and we will dedicate the resources needed to be successful. There is $274.5 million committed for Canadian Forces health services, because the obligation to care for our people does not end when an operation does. The CAF continues to build a more modern, effective and inclusive military supported by digital tools and data-driven processes. Work is ongoing to improve efficiency, reduce delays and align recruitment and training systems with the evolving needs of the organization and of Canadians. Words do not defend Canada, but capabilities do. The CAF must be ready to operate in the Arctic, across North America, through NORAD, within NATO’s collective defence framework and wherever global stability demands a Canadian contribution. These estimates include $7.3 billion for in-service support, keeping the equipment we have available, reliable and sustainable. As well, there is $1.2 billion for fleet equipment readiness to adapt and respond to a faster and more complex security environment. Preparedness also means investing in what comes next. That is why we have included $12.8 billion for major multi-stage procurements, River class destroyers, joint support ships, Canadian multi-mission aircraft and critical infrastructure investments that will serve Canada for decades. These capabilities will defend our sovereignty in the north, protect our maritime approaches and allow us to operate shoulder to shoulder with our allies. The Canadian Coast Guard is part of the Department of National Defence’s main estimates. The $4 billion included here funds its critical missions, search and rescue, icebreaking, environmental response and ocean science. As part of the defence portfolio, the Coast Guard will now do more, sharing intelligence, coordinating with defence partners and enhancing Canada’s maritime security posture. In a country with three oceans and the world’s longest coastline, that is no small thing. No country defends itself alone, not Canada and not our allies. That is reflected in the $3.3 billion in grants and contributions, funding programs, organizations and partners whose work advances Canada’s defence mandate. A significant share supports Ukraine through the military training and co-operation program, because the fight for a rules-based international order is one in which Canada has a direct stake. We are investing in NATO initiatives that strengthen interoperability, intelligence sharing and collective decision-making across the alliance. We are also doubling down on Canada’s defence industrial base. These estimates include initial investments for the new Canadian defence industry resilience program, strengthening domestic production capacity and Canadian sovereignty. That includes support for nitrocellulose production, a critical energetic material for artillery that is in high demand across allied militaries. Programs like IDEaS and MINDS continue to connect innovators, academics and industry to the defence mission, turning Canadian expertise into Canadian capability. In February, we released Canada’s first-ever defence industrial strategy. The framework is straightforward: building Canada first, partnering where we cannot and buying smart where we must. These estimates put that strategy into action. Spending more is only part of the story. Spending well is the other part. Through the comprehensive expenditure review, the Department of National Defence is targeting approximately $460 million in operating cost reductions from 2026-27 through 2028-29. That means continuing the fleet divestment strategy, streamlining the real property portfolio, expanding energy performance contracts and modernizing project approvals and internal business processes. The global security environment is not waiting for anyone. We are building again. The 2026-27 main estimates are a down payment on that commitment, an investment in people, in preparedness and in the partnerships that make Canada stronger. We are spending with purpose, we are investing with urgency and we are rebuilding the Canadian Armed Forces with the ambition this moment demands. I urge all members to support these estimates.”

• Echo ×5

  A repeated line

  “Rearm and reinvest in the Canadian Armed Forces.”

  Said 5 times by 5 members since June 1.

  Every time it was said →

“I disagree with the member. The defence minister has a good plan, and our new defence strategy is doing well. People working in the defence sector in Halifax support the work we are doing.”

“Mr. Speaker, I wholeheartedly disagree with the member. I do not think that we are putting the cart before the horse. I am really excited about the defence industrial strategy. I am really excited about the vision, hard work and accomplishments so far of our Minister of Defence. I am really proud of all of the members of the defence sector in Halifax, many of whom I know more and more, having taken this role on just over a year ago. I am excited to continue to partner with them. The response that I have received so far is one of gratitude, optimism and hope for the future of Canada and of our defence.”

• Little substance
  ?

  Reply to a debate question

  Signal 8 of 100

  Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

  See full analysis →

“Our defence spending is helping Dalhousie University do more ocean science research. Also, Halifax will host the Our Ocean Conference in 2027.”

“Mr. Speaker, I am really excited about the dual spending that is happening as we put our strategy into action. Dalhousie University has a wonderful ocean science and research program, and it is capitalizing on defence spending to further ocean science and research. That is a really important piece of it, where we are going to increase our innovation and research. Excitedly, today, we just announced that the Our Ocean Conference is going to be hosted for the first time in Canada in 14 years in Halifax in 2027, where we will bring all the great minds from science and research together to continue to advance our shared priorities.”

• Didn't answer
  ?

  Reply to a debate question

  Relevance 45 of 100

  None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

  See full analysis →

“We do have a defence plan, and it lists 10 key military needs for Canada. I want the member to share what people in her area are saying about those needs.”

“Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my colleague for her support for members of the Canadian Armed Forces and their families. The member spoke a lot about the defence industrial strategy, and a previous question suggested that there was no defence strategy. In fact, in the defence industrial strategy, it clearly indicates the 10 sovereign capabilities that Canada has indicated very clearly with respect to what they are looking for in terms of procurement and our own sovereignty. I would ask the member to elaborate a bit about what she is hearing on the ground in her riding with respect to those 10 sovereign capabilities.”

“I have been focusing on local celebrations, like the anniversary of the HMCS Sackville and honouring the Battle of the Atlantic. I also announced new housing funding for military members in Halifax. I plan to talk to the people in my riding about their main priorities soon.”

“Mr. Speaker, my conversations have been more focused on some celebrations lately. We just had the 85th anniversary of the HMCS Sackville. We recommissioned it notionally, which was fantastic. We had the commemoration of the Battle of the Atlantic. I was able to make a funding announcement for improved and increased housing for CAF members in Halifax and across the Halifax Regional Municipality. My conversations have been much more celebratory of late, but I am sure my constituents have a lot to say on those 10 priorities, and I will be sure to talk to them shortly.”

“I support the space launch work we are looking into in Nova Scotia. I do not know what deals the province is making, so I cannot talk about that.”

“Mr. Speaker, I am very excited about the launch capabilities that we are exploring in Nova Scotia. I have no idea of the details of the provincial government and what deals they are making, so I cannot comment on that any further.”

• Didn't answer
  ?

  Reply to a debate question

  Relevance 48 of 100

  None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

  See full analysis →

“The government's job is to support people, not make money. We are helping businesses and giving people money for food and basic needs. I want the member to say if he actually supports helping Canadians, or if he is just playing politics.”

“Mr. Speaker, one thing I think we all need to understand is how important our sovereignty is and the fact that the government is not in the business of making money. It is in the business of facilitating and making sure each individual Canadian is well supported. The government right now has supported not only industry in these difficult times, but also individual Canadians, through things like the groceries and essentials benefit. Does the member favour supporting Canadians, or is this a gimmick for him to just get a leg up in how we operate and more of a partisan issue as opposed to supporting Canadians?”

• Personal attack
  ?

  Question or comment in debate

  Respect 68 of 100

  This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “a gimmick for him to just get a leg up”.

  See full analysis →