Connected Care for Canadians Act

Bill S-5, Connected Care for Canadians Act · Second reading · now at second reading in the House Where it stands

What Bill S-5 would do

The bill would require health information technology licensed, sold, or provided as a service by vendors to be interoperable. It would also prohibit these vendors from blocking data. The published material gives no further detail.

Official text (opens in a new tab)

26 statements

Brad Vis, Mission—Matsqui—Abbotsford

Conservative
“I want the member to say more about how hard it is for people in rural areas to get fair health care compared to people in cities.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, during the member’s remarks, she reflected on the challenges that many rural Canadians face in accessing health care services that the average Canadian in a large urban area would take for granted. Could the member comment more on the challenges that rural Canadians face in equity with respect to health care?

Helena Konanz, Similkameen—South Okanagan—West Kootenay

Conservative
“People in rural areas cannot get family doctors or specialists. For example, the regional hospital in Penticton lost all three of its neurologists. This kind of problem would not happen in a city.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I know much of my colleague’s riding is rural, so his constituents have many of the same issues that rural communities have across the country. They cannot access a family doctor. They cannot access specialists. A good example is the Penticton hospital, which is a regional hospital. It services thousands of people and, by the way, it services thousands of seniors, many of whom have neurological issues. All three neurologists at the hospital quit or stepped down, so we do not have a neurologist in our regional hospital. I do not think that would happen in an urban centre. We are going to be in a lot of trouble if that is not corrected. That is just an example of a problem faced in rural Canada right now with health care.

Grant Jackson, Brandon—Souris

Conservative
“We support the goals of this health data bill, but we still have questions for the committee to look at. I want my colleague to share more about her experience with the Health Infoway scandal while we wait for the audit results.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I want to thank and congratulate my colleague on her excellent speech. I think she highlighted our broad support for the bill, and the goals and objectives of the bill, while still making it very clear that there are a number of clarity points that we will be discussing with the government at committee when the bill moves to that stage. I wonder if my colleague would provide a bit more clarity and detail on her experience with the Health Infoway scandal. I know we are awaiting the results of the audit, but I would like to hear some more thoughts from her on that.

Helena Konanz, Similkameen—South Okanagan—West Kootenay

Conservative
“Infoway lost $300 million and cannot be trusted to run the health program in this bill. The health minister refuses to explain this loss to a committee and wants to audit Infoway before giving it more money. The government needs to fix these problems with Infoway.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I really appreciate that the Prime Minister is sitting in the House. Oh, I do not think I am allowed to say that. I really appreciate that most of the Liberal Party is here, so we can go over, again, the scandal of PrescribeIT and Infoway, as $300 million has been lost into thin air. We do not know why because the health minister refuses to come speak to the committee about it. Also, the health minister has even said that Infoway needs to have an audit and does not want to secure its regular funding until there is an audit. There is no way that an organization like Infoway can run the program that is described in Bill S-5. I appreciate the fact that most of the Liberal Party is in the House right now and will address, hopefully soon, the problems with Infoway and PrescribeIT.

Frank Caputo, Kamloops—Thompson—Nicola

Conservative
“I want the budget to fund local projects in my area, including rebuilding the Red Bridge and a new fire hall in Barriere. I also want to know why the health minister refuses to show up at committee to answer questions about the prescription software program.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is always a pleasure to rise on behalf of the people of Kamloops—Thompson—Nicola, and I am going to take this last opportunity to hope that the budget includes funding for things in Kamloops—Thompson—Nicola like the rebuilding and fast-tracking of the Red Bridge. The Liberals can groan all they want about the funding of the Red Bridge, but I will fight every single day for that funding, or for a new Barriere fire hall. It is always wonderful to ask for these types of things. The Liberals may groan, but I am here to fight for my constituents and common-sense measures. My colleague talked about the PrescribeIT scandal. The minister has not appeared at committee. What does it say to Canadians when a minister refuses to go to committee?

Helena Konanz, Similkameen—South Okanagan—West Kootenay

Conservative

Linked statement

“Canadians have lost trust in government health programs after the government wasted $300 million on a digital prescription program. We must rebuild that trust before we start new health programs like this one.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I think there are a lot of things that Canadians are looking for in their health care system, but what they are really looking for is trust. They want to be able to trust everyone in the House. They want to be able to trust the system. If they cannot depend on a program, for example, PrescribeIT, which wasted $300 million, run by Infoway, how can they trust any new program that comes forward from the Liberals? We need to, as a House, rebuild the trust of the entire Canadian people and put in new programs like those described in Bill S-5. We need to first rebuild the trust that has been lost by the public, which has read and learned about what has happened with the scandal of PrescribeIT and Infoway.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 163

  1. Government Orders Connected Care for Canadians Act 115 statements
  2. Oral Questions Taxation 2 statements
  3. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 5 statements
  4. Oral Questions The Economy 3 statements
  5. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  6. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 3 statements
  7. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 4 statements
  8. Oral Questions Oil and Gas Industry 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 4 statements
  10. Oral Questions Agriculture and Agri-Food 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 17 statements
  13. Oral Questions Major Projects Office 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Major Projects Office 4 statements
  16. Oral Questions Regional Economic Development 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions Justice 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  19. Oral Questions Business of the House 2 statements
  20. Oral Questions Justice 2 statements
  21. Government Orders Connected Care for Canadians Act 26 statements
  22. Oral Questions Artificial Intelligence 2 statements
  23. Oral Questions Finance 15 statements
  24. Government Orders The Budget 38 statements
  25. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  26. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  27. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements