“I want the bill to have clear rules and strong oversight. I don't want decisions made behind closed doors without explanation. I want Canadians to see the reasoning and cost for major financial commitments. I want national security safeguards in the law from the start, not added later. The goal is for Canada to lead in space in a way Canadians can be proud of, not without answers and not behind closed doors.”
What they said. What they meant.
Plain-language translations from the House of Commons.
Recent debates
8 latest topics
Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act
57 statements
Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act
19 statements
Arab Heritage Month Act
5 statements
The Economy
15 statements
Government Priorities
2 statements
Government Priorities
2 statements
Housing
12 statements
The Environment
2 statements
Government Orders
Canadian Space Launch Act
A bill to establish a legislative framework for space launch and re-entry activities in Canada, including regulation-making powers, liability and indemnification, and emergency authorities for the Minister of Transport. During debate, Conservatives raised concerns about a lack of transparency and checks and balances in the bill, while Liberals focused on the potential economic benefits of the space industry.
“I want to say I support space too. But I don't want to give the government a blank cheque. I want some checks and balances on how they spend the money.”
“I'm focusing on how this bill puts a lot of power in one minister's hands. He could play favorites and distort the space market. Who would benefit from a system this arbitrary?”
“I agree. This bill gives too much power to one minister. Decisions would be made in secret. We want more open decisions on space projects.”
“Do you agree this space bill has no details, bad security, and lets one minister ignore Parliament and make secret deals with bad guys?”
“I want you to think the government is bad with money and full of scandals. This space bill might let them waste more money like they did before.”
“Canadians want space and space money. But they also want to know what we're spending. The bill needs to show that.”
“The government's space bill gives too much power to ministers with too little oversight. It lets them make closed-door decisions that might help insiders instead of picking space projects on merit. We should be transparent and defend against foreign interference, not concentrate power or reward insiders while taxpayers take the risk.”
“This bill gives too much power to ministers.”
“Look at all those meetings before a company got lots of taxpayer money. The company's value shot up right after. This looks like shady backroom dealing to me.”
“The government is spending way too much taxpayer money on this. The launch site should cost $13,000 a year. The government is paying $20 million! Someone made a lot of money off this deal. The taxpayer is paying way too much.”
“I want the government to say why it is treating this company different from other companies. The company is making a lot of money. How did they get this special treatment?”
“I want less power for ministers. More power for ministers is bad. It lets them pick winners and losers. It's bad for predictability. Predictability is what private investors want most. Democracy is in danger. The government is giving more power to ministers and taking away scrutiny. Canada had a good reputation. Now it's being eroded.”
“The bill doesn't really define a launch vehicle. The minister could call anything a launch vehicle if he wanted to. There are no rules for safety or security either. If the Liberals will not write it out in the bill, will they at least show us their draft rules?”
“I don't like that. I want taxpayers to spend more money. More money for my program.”
“I'm talking about a bunch of Liberal scandals to make them look bad. I don't want to spend money on this space launch pad.”
“I was talking about space launch corruption. Marie Lumsden helped expose the directors of a corrupt company.”