Business of Supply

An opposition motion debated during Business of Supply criticizing the government’s proposed $25-billion Canada Strong Fund, a national sovereign wealth fund to be financed by borrowing and used to invest in major projects. Government members said the fund would attract private investment, follows models used in countries like Norway and Singapore, and supports a long-term economic plan. Conservative, Bloc Québécois, and Green members opposed or questioned the plan, saying real wealth funds are built from surpluses rather than debt, that few details or governance rules have been provided, that project choices could be politically influenced, and that the money would be better spent on cost-of-living relief or raised by taxing oil company profits. Some members also raised the government’s handling of the trade war and its budget deficit during the discussion.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

4 statements

Xavier Barsalou-Duval, Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes—Verchères

Bloc Québécois
“The government wants to borrow $25 billion for an investment fund. It takes on all the financial risk for risky projects so private businesses can make a profit. Since the member across the way likes this plan so much, I want to know if he will sell his own assets and invest in it.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Liberal government’s infamous sovereign wealth fund proposes, among other things, to use the $25 billion in borrowed money to invest in projects that are too risky for the private sector, projects that the private sector did not want to invest in. The government is also proposing to allow individuals, like us and our constituents, to invest in this sovereign wealth fund while guaranteeing the security of their investments. We are told that these investments in the sovereign wealth fund will help attract more private investment. As a result, the fund will “derisk” these operations. The way we see it, the sovereign wealth fund will absorb the risk so the private sector can make a profit. Given his great enthusiasm for the sovereign wealth fund, does my colleague opposite intend to sell his personal assets and invest them in the sovereign wealth fund, as he would be able to do?

Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe, Lac-Saint-Jean

Bloc Québécois
“The Liberals' arguments about this fund make no sense. Norway did not borrow money to build its wealth fund, but this one will. This fund will not be independent either, because the Prime Minister will choose which projects get money. The Liberals are not telling the truth about what this fund really is.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Clarity 33 of 100

    Much of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, a number of things do not add up in the Liberals’ arguments. First, we are told that this fund is similar, and even comparable, to Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, when we know full well that Norway did not go into debt to finance its own fund. Second, we are told that this fund will be independent, when we know full well that it will fund only projects that come from the Major Projects Office and that the Prime Minister will decide which projects are referred to the Major Projects Office. Obviously, this fund will be politically influenced. Why are the Liberals trying to tell us they bought a cat, when it is actually a horse? Why do they think everyone will believe it is a cat when it is really a horse?

Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe, Lac-Saint-Jean

Bloc Québécois
“The Prime Minister was elected on a promise to end the trade war. He kept delaying his deadline, and the trade war is now worse. His only plan is to borrow $25 billion for a fund that is not independent. I want to know what this says about the government's long-term plan.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I have a simple question for my colleague. The government and the Prime Minister were elected a year ago, almost to the day, on essentially a single promise: to end the trade war. In April 2025, the Prime Minister promised us that the matter would be settled by June. He then postponed it to July and then September. In the end, here we are a year later, and not only is the trade war still going on, but it has gotten worse with Mr. Trump’s recent executive orders. The only thing this government can come up with is to borrow $25 billion and create a fund that is neither sovereign nor independent. What does that say about the government’s long-term vision?

Xavier Barsalou-Duval, Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes—Verchères

Bloc Québécois
“The government wants Canadians to put their money into a new wealth fund. But the Prime Minister will get to pick where that money is invested. I am asking my colleague if he would put his own money into projects picked by the Prime Minister.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, in yesterday’s economic update, the government announced that ordinary taxpayers will be able to contribute to this Canadian sovereign wealth fund that the Prime Minister wants to create. It so happens that his goal, as Prime Minister, is more or less to dictate what investments the sovereign wealth fund will cover. In fact, all of it will involve projects recommended by the Major Projects Office, and those projects will have been chosen by the Prime Minister’s Office. That means the Prime Minister is the one who will determine what investments will be made through the sovereign wealth fund. Does my colleague intend to invest his personal savings in the Prime Minister’s preferred picks?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 114

  1. Government Orders Business of Supply 86 statements
  2. Government Orders Business of Supply 29 statements
  3. Oral Questions Finance 12 statements
  4. Oral Questions Oil and Gas Industry 6 statements
  5. Oral Questions Finance 15 statements
  6. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions Finance 11 statements
  8. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Finance 19 statements
  10. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 6 statements
  12. Oral Questions Youth 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Air Transportation 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Mental Health and Addictions 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Business of the House 2 statements
  17. Government Orders Business of Supply 53 statements
  18. Private Members' Business National Framework on the Durability of Electronic Products and Essential Home Appliances Act 13 statements
  19. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  20. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  21. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements