Health

During Question Period on health, Conservatives asked about the end of federal funding for the PrescribeIT electronic prescription program run through Canada Health Infoway, saying $300 million was spent with little to show for it, citing the former CEO’s salary, and objecting that Liberals at the health committee moved debate on their motion for an investigation in camera. Liberals replied that the program launched in 2017 was intended to become self-funded, that uptake fell short of what was needed for financial sustainability, that funding is being redirected to better serve patients, and that Infoway’s mandate is being refocused toward national health data standards. A Liberal house leader also spoke generally about the value of committee collaboration.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

6 statements

Burton Bailey, Red Deer

Conservative
“Liberals are blocking our questions about a $300-million health project. I want to know where that money went and who got rich from it.”
  • Opposition question in Question Period

    Signal 16 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, all week at the health committee, Liberals tried to block and silence Conservatives from getting answers on the $300-million PrescribeIT scandal. They have no problems shutting down debate, covering up and protecting Liberal insiders who got rich off the backs of Canadians. I guess this is the new normal that Liberals always wanted, but Conservatives will never stop asking these Liberals the tough questions they want to hide from. Canadians deserve to know: Where did the $300 million go and who got rich?

Maggie Chi, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health

Liberal
“We stopped federal funding for the electronic prescription program because not enough people used it and it could not pay for itself. We are putting that money where it can help patients more.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 45 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, PrescribeIT was launched by the previous government in 2017 following consultations with provinces and territories. The program was always intended to be self-funded over time. When it became clear that it did not have the expected uptake and there was no path toward financial sustainability, Canada’s new government made the responsible decision to end federal funding for the program and refocus resources to where they will deliver the greatest benefits to patients and our health system.

Burton Bailey, Red Deer

Conservative
“A former health agency boss was paid over 800,000 dollars a year for a failed program, and 300 million tax dollars were wasted. The Liberals are protecting him from committee questions. I want to know who will take the blame next.”
  • A repeated line

    “The former CEO of Canada Health Infoway.”

    Said 3 times by 2 members since May 1.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, Canadians do not want Liberal spin. They want to know where and why their money was wasted. Take Michael Green, the disgraced former CEO of Canada Health Infoway. He was paid over $800,000 a year for more than a decade to run that failed program. These Liberals are now shielding him from committee for the scandal. Conservatives will not be silenced. We will not stop demanding answers on why $300 million in tax dollars was abused by this government. Michael Green was the first to take the fall for these Liberals, so my question is, who is next?

Maggie Chi, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health

Liberal
“We are changing how we spend health money and changing what Canada Health Infoway does. We want national rules for health data while letting our partners build the tools patients need.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 46 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
  • A repeated line

    “Faster and more effectively for all Canadians.”

    Said 3 times by 2 members since May 1.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, Canada’s new government was elected with a clear mandate to ensure programs and policies deliver smarter, faster and more effectively for all Canadians. We are refocusing our spending and Canada Health Infoway’s mandate so we can support the development of national health data standards while allowing our health sector partners to develop solutions that work for all patients.

Helena Konanz, Similkameen—South Okanagan—West Kootenay

Conservative
“Conservatives asked for an investigation into a government program that wasted $300 million. The Liberals moved the meeting behind closed doors, which legally stops me from talking about it for 30 years. That is not transparent.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, at a recent health committee, Conservatives moved a motion calling for a full investigation into the Liberals’ wasteful, $300-million PrescribeIT boondoggle. The Liberals immediately responded by moving that meeting behind closed doors. As a result, under House rules, I am forbidden from telling Canadians what happened in that meeting for the next 30 years. Does silencing MPs on committee work for 30 years show transparency from this majority Liberal government?

Kevin Lamoureux, Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal

Linked statement

“Parliament committees do important work that helps everyone here. I want members to work together more in these committees.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 47 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, our standing committees of Parliament play a very important role. I think it is important that we encourage collaboration as much as we can. Many would argue that what happens in standing committees is very beneficial for the entire House. Let us look forward to seeing more collaboration at standing committees.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 115

  1. Government Orders Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act 29 statements
  2. Oral Questions Finance 12 statements
  3. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions Small Business 2 statements
  5. Oral Questions Finance 14 statements
  6. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 5 statements
  8. Oral Questions Industry 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Finance 18 statements
  11. Oral Questions Sport 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Health 6 statements
  13. Oral Questions Climate Change 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Climate Change 2 statements
  17. Government Orders Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act 20 statements
  18. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 4 statements
  19. Government Orders Privilege 2 statements
  20. Private Members' Business Offender Rehabilitation Act 14 statements
  21. Government Orders Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act 21 statements