Translate Politics Parliament in plain language.

The Economy

Question period focused on the economy, mainly household debt and cost of living. The Conservatives said Canadian households carry the highest debt in the G7, more people are missing mortgage and bill payments, and bankruptcies are at their highest level since 2009; they asked the Prime Minister to cut taxes and spending and change his economic plans so people can afford to stay in their homes. The Liberals pointed to affordability measures such as the paused gas excise tax and cancelled consumer carbon tax, foreign investment, approvals of mines, LNG and energy projects, and training for well-paying union jobs, and suggested the opposition should support these programs and stop criticizing the country. Some exchanges were personal jabs about the party leaders rather than on the topic itself.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text

8 statements

Wayne Long

Liberal
“We paused taxes to save Canadians 28 cents a litre on gas. The opposition leader should stop making videos and work with us to help Canadians.”

  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 20 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis

  • Government answer in Question Period

    Signal 39 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis

  • A repeated line

    “We cut the consumer carbon tax.”

    Said 7 times by 2 members since April 29.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, while that leader is focused on podcasts, fitness videos and empty-parking-lot press conferences, on this side of the House we are focused on delivering affordability for Canadians. We just paused the federal excise tax on gas, 10¢ a litre. We cancelled the consumer carbon tax, which is 18¢ a litre. Combined, that is 28¢ a litre in savings for Canadians. It is time for that leader to put down the kettlebells and help us build Canada strong.

View on ourcommons.ca Grade D+ View analysis

Patty Hajdu

Liberal
“This afternoon, I had lunch with Sean Strickland from Canada's Building Trades Unions.”

  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, this afternoon I had lunch with Sean Strickland from Canada’s Building— Some hon. members: Oh, oh!

View on ourcommons.ca View analysis

Patty Hajdu

Liberal
“I paid for lunch with a union leader to hear ideas about creating good union jobs. These workers support our plan to build major projects with well-paying union jobs.”

  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, since those guys do not know how to pick up a cheque, in fact, I paid for lunch and I took Sean Strickland, president of Canada’s Building Trades Unions, out for lunch because we want to hear their ideas about how we make sure that these good, union jobs, which, by the way, employers need all across the country, come to fruition. Canada’s Building Trades Unions’ operating engineers, who are here in Ottawa today, are all so excited about the plan to build Canada strong and get major projects off the ground using good union labour that provides great-paying jobs, something that I know they are going to—

View on ourcommons.ca View analysis

Patty Hajdu

Liberal
“There is a mining boom in northern Ontario. People there are grateful that our government invests in natural resources and trains skilled workers for good jobs with pensions.”

  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 39 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, last week I was in Marathon, Ontario, to talk about mining. There is a mining boom in northern Ontario, something I think these guys are not aware of. Do members know what came up over and over again? It was gratitude for a government that is taking seriously the investment into natural resource extraction in northern Ontario, that is helping provinces in the country get natural resource projects off the ground, and that is taking seriously the need to invest in the skilled trades workers, who, by the way, create the great jobs with pensions in hard-working environments, which is something I think that member does not really understand.

View on ourcommons.ca Grade C+ View analysis

Tim Hodgson

Liberal
“The Conservative leader should stop criticizing Canada and go see the energy and mining projects we are building across the country.”

  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, instead of the Leader of the Opposition lifting kettlebells, maybe he should come to Kitimat and see where we are building new LNG facilities. Maybe he should come to Dease Lake, where we are building the biggest mines in the world. Maybe he should come to Darlington, where we are building new nuclear reactors. Maybe he should come to Nova Scotia, where we are building new projects. Maybe, instead of talking down Canada, he should start coming to see how we are building Canada.

View on ourcommons.ca Grade F View analysis

Steven MacKinnon

Liberal
“I want the member to explain why he opposes our programs that save Canadians thousands of dollars. He votes against cheaper child care, tax cuts, and the child benefit.”

  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 16 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis

  • Government answer in Question Period

    Respect 68 of 100

    This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “It is to save him writing the questions out for all the other members of the bench who do not get to ask the questions”.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we know why this member asks all the questions. It is to save him writing the questions out for all the other members of the bench who do not get to ask the questions. While we are asking questions, when is that member going to answer why he would refuse saving Canadians thousands of dollars on child care? When is he going to justify his opposition to reducing taxes for Canadians? When is he going to justify his opposition to creating the Canada child benefit? All of these things save Canadians thousands of dollars. Why is he against them?

View on ourcommons.ca Grade D View analysis

Steven MacKinnon

Liberal
“Under this Prime Minister, Canada leads the G7 in foreign investment. We have approved big projects, mines, and building, and we are training young workers. The opposition should stop talking down our country.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, in the first year of this Prime Minister’s tenure, we have the number one leading economy in the G7 for foreign investment. In this Prime Minister’s first year, we have approved major projects. We have approved mines. We have approved building. We are training young Canadians, and we are building this country brick by brick. The blame Canada brigade can sit down and take a seat.

View on ourcommons.ca Grade A– View analysis

Wayne Long

Liberal
“We have strong leaders who are cutting taxes and investing to build a strong economy. The Conservatives only use gimmicks. The member should stop making videos and help us.”

  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 20 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis

  • Government answer in Question Period

    Signal 37 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, let us do a comparison. On this side, we have a world-class statesman and a world-class business and economic leader. On that side, they have empty-parking-lot press conferences with slogans, gimmicks and props. On this side of the House, we are going to build the strongest economy in the G7 and the most resilient economy in the G7. We are cutting taxes. We are investing in Canada. It is time for the member to stop the fitness videos and help us build Canada strong.

View on ourcommons.ca Grade D+ View analysis

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 122

All 46 items ·
  1. Government Orders Business of Supply 64 statements
  2. Government Orders Business of Supply 45 statements
  3. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions Taxation 4 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  6. Oral Questions Justice 6 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 16 statements
  8. Oral Questions The Environment 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions Finance 6 statements
  10. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 10 statements
  11. Oral Questions Public Safety 8 statements
  12. Oral Questions Women and Gender Equality 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 6 statements
  14. Oral Questions Natural Resources 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions The Environment 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Business of the House 2 statements
  19. Government Orders Government Orders 2 statements
  20. Oral Questions Taxation 4 statements
  21. Oral Questions Emergency Management 3 statements
  22. Government Orders Business of Supply 15 statements
  23. Government Orders Business of Supply 15 statements
  24. Government Orders Business of Supply 27 statements
  25. Private Members' Business An Act to repeal certain restrictions on shipping 12 statements
  26. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  27. Government Orders Business of Supply 366 statements
  28. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements