Aerospace Industry

Question period touched on aerospace and defence spending. The Conservatives asked about a $200 million federal investment in a spaceport project in Nova Scotia, saying the facility cost about $70 million to build and is leased to a private company for a small amount, and asked the minister to table the lease agreement and explain who lobbied for and benefits from the project. The Liberals responded by announcing the purchase of GlobalEye airborne early warning aircraft, saying it will help protect the Arctic and support about 3,000 Canadian aerospace and defence jobs, and by listing military investments including recruitment levels, pay raises, base renewals, housing and new equipment.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

2 statements

Jacob Mantle, York—Durham

Conservative
“The government is spending $200 million on a spaceport that only costs $70 million to build, while the private company leases it for just $13,000. Why are Canadians paying so much money for this?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, to describe a gullible listener, we used to say, “I have some swampland in Florida for you.” Now, thanks to the Minister of Defence, we can say a Canadian version: “I have a gravel pit in Nova Scotia for you.” At the low cost of just $200 million, the Liberals are trying to build a spaceport. The problem is that the company that is leasing it is paying just $13,000, and construction will cost only $70 million. If the construction is $70 million, and the lease is only $13,000, why are Canadians forking out $200 million?

Jacob Mantle, York—Durham

Conservative
“I want the minister to show the House the lease agreement. I also want him to explain why Liberal insiders lobbied for it and benefit from it.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my colleague begged the Liberals to try to have some respect for this place and answer the questions, but that is the essence of the scam. It is just illusions. The Liberals have figured out how to turn a gravel pit into a money pit. It is more costs and more debt, all on the national credit card. If everything is above board and hunky-dory, as the minister claims, why does he not table in the House the lease agreement and give us the details? While he is at it, maybe he could explain why it is Liberal insiders who lobbied for it and Liberal insiders who would benefit from it. Will the minister come clean today and give us a copy of the agreement?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 123

  1. Oral Questions Finance 8 statements
  2. Oral Questions Aerospace Industry 4 statements
  3. Oral Questions Climate Change 7 statements
  4. Oral Questions Rail Transportation 4 statements
  5. Oral Questions Taxation 7 statements
  6. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Affairs 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  8. Oral Questions Sport 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 11 statements
  10. Oral Questions Government Priorities 4 statements
  11. Oral Questions Sport 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Public Safety 8 statements
  13. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Climate Change 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  16. Government Orders Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2 11 statements
  17. Oral Questions National Defence 8 statements
  18. Government Orders Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2 16 statements
  19. Private Members' Business Canada Labour Code 12 statements
  20. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  21. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  22. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements