Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship

In question period on immigration, Conservatives said nearly 74,000 people whose refugee claims were rejected remain in Canada, some untraceable, and are receiving public health coverage, and that the government is still funding municipalities to house asylum seekers. They also raised the case of a non-citizen who received house arrest for thefts, asking why the government did not support their proposed Criminal Code changes to require deportation or stop lighter sentences for non-citizens. Liberal ministers replied that the health coverage is a temporary program limited to essential services, that asylum claims have fallen 59% and the measures will save about $400 million a year, that current law does not allow judges to reduce sentences based on immigration status, and that criminals are prosecuted while Canada still has obligations to protect vulnerable people. They also noted a 2013 Supreme Court ruling on the sentencing issue.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

6 statements

Lena Metlege Diab, Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship

Liberal
“This temporary health program only covers essential care, and its cost depends on how many people use it. We reduced the number of users by 59 percent. This will save taxpayers over $400 million a year.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 46 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, as I said yesterday, this is a temporary program for health coverage. It covers essential services. The cost is tied to volumes. The good news, which the Conservatives do not want to hear, is that we brought the volumes down by 59% because of a Liberal budget, because of a Liberal bill. As the PBO said this week, we will save taxpayers over $400 million annually.

Steven MacKinnon, Minister of Transport and Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“We believe criminals should be prosecuted and put in jail.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 49 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we believe that criminals should be in jail. We believe that criminals should be prosecuted to the full— Some hon. members: Oh, oh!

Steven MacKinnon, Minister of Transport and Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“We believe criminals should be jailed under the law. We also believe Canada must welcome vulnerable people who are fleeing war.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 46 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we believe that criminals should be prosecuted and jailed to the full extent of the law. We also believe that Canada has an obligation under international treaties to accept vulnerable people from war-torn and ravaged areas around this world. Every single Canadian I know, except perhaps that member, would give care to a vulnerable human being who arrives on Canadian shores and needs our care.

Lena Metlege Diab, Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship

Liberal
“We are managing immigration responsibly. Asylum claims are down by 59 percent. Our actions, including this bill, will save $400 million every year. We will still protect people who need our help.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 93 of 100

    Of this answer, 90% addressed the question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I know that member and I respect him, and I know he knows that I am here to manage immigration and migration responsibly to strengthen our rural communities. That is exactly what we are doing. Our asylum claims are down 59%. The PBO confirmed with us that because of the measures we have taken with co-pays and with Bill C-12, we will be reducing those costs by $400 million annually. We will continue to protect those who are in need of protection.

Lena Metlege Diab, Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship

Liberal
“Our laws do not let judges give lighter sentences to asylum seekers. Anyone who commits a crime in Canada will face consequences. We have introduced crime bills, but the Conservatives refuse to vote with us to pass them.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the member knows that there is nothing in the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act that allows judges to discount any sentences. She also knows that, Canadian or not, no one can commit a crime on Canadian soil with impunity, including those who are on asylum and anyone else. We have brought in measures. We have brought in criminal bills. The Conservatives keep avoiding voting with us. We expect them to let us, in the next couple of weeks—

Sean Fraser, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and Minister responsible for the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency

Liberal
“The member did nothing about this problem when she was in cabinet, even after the Supreme Court ruled on it in 2013. We are making big changes to our criminal laws. Anyone who commits a serious crime should face serious punishment, including deportation if the court decides.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the issue that the member raises has been an issue in Canada for a number of years. She should know well that the Supreme Court of Canada, in 2013, actually ruled on this specific issue. What is interesting about the timeline of that decision is that she was sitting in the federal cabinet at the time and chose to do absolutely nothing about it. For our part, we are in the midst of launching the most serious set of criminal law reforms to strengthen the Criminal Code that this country has seen in generations. Regardless of one’s immigration status, if they commit a serious crime, they should be met with a serious penalty and, where a court deems appropriate, that can and should include deportation.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 123

  1. Oral Questions Finance 8 statements
  2. Oral Questions Aerospace Industry 4 statements
  3. Oral Questions Climate Change 7 statements
  4. Oral Questions Rail Transportation 4 statements
  5. Oral Questions Taxation 7 statements
  6. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Affairs 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  8. Oral Questions Sport 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 11 statements
  10. Oral Questions Government Priorities 4 statements
  11. Oral Questions Sport 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Public Safety 8 statements
  13. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Climate Change 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  16. Government Orders Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2 11 statements
  17. Oral Questions National Defence 8 statements
  18. Government Orders Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2 16 statements
  19. Private Members' Business Canada Labour Code 12 statements
  20. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  21. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  22. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements