“I want taxpayer money to help my preferred people. Lots of programs and numbers show I'm working hard!”
What they said. What they meant.
Plain-language translations from the House of Commons.
Recent debates
8 latest topics
Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act
57 statements
Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act
19 statements
Arab Heritage Month Act
5 statements
The Economy
15 statements
Government Priorities
2 statements
Government Priorities
2 statements
Housing
12 statements
The Environment
2 statements
Government Orders
Business of Supply
A bill to make many changes to Canada's immigration and border control laws. During debate, Conservatives asked questions about specific cases and raised concerns about fraud, while the Liberal minister responded but often discussed unrelated topics like Canada Summer Jobs and praised a Liberal colleague.
“I want more taxpayer money for my programs. I like it when money comes to my city. Money must keep coming for my people and my programs.”
“I like my friend. I think she does a good job. I want more people to come here and study. I want to make that easy. It will help us later.”
“I doubt the minister's number. I think this will let in a lot more people than she says.”
“I want to make it look like we are putting clear rules in place.”
“Do you really think only 5,000 new Canadians will come per year?”
“I want to minimize the number of new Canadians. Many apply, but I will not say how many will actually get citizenship.”
“You're talking down the number of new citizens, but the real number is already high. Admit it.”
“I'm saying the bill has good rules for who gets to be a citizen, and it keeps out the kinds of citizens I want to keep out.”
“I want to imply CBC said something scary that the minister should be afraid of.Unnamed millions and unnamed nights become my punchline.”
“I don't want to give a straight answer. I'm going to vaguely imply something about rules instead.”
“I'm calling out the minister for dodging my question earlier. I want her to stop avoiding the topic and give real numbers.”
“I don't like the Conservative's characterization. I'm assuring you the law has strict rules. Applicants must prove their ancestry.”
“You're dodging the real number. I demand you admit how many people this could affect.”
“I won't answer numbers. I'll just say rules exist and move on.”
“You did something bad. I want you to admit it.”
“I don't like your accusation. I'll just repeat myself until it goes away.”
“Did you tell cabinet your bill opens up citizenship to millions of Americans?”
“What the minister told cabinet is none of your business. Trust us, it's fine.”
“Did you think about not letting people use great-great-grandpa to get citizenship?”