Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2

Bill C-31, Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2 · Second reading · now at report stage in the House Where it stands

What Bill C-31 would do

This budget implementation bill would change federal tax laws by delivering automatic benefits to lower-income individuals and adjusting business, excise, and international minimum tax rules. It would also ban most non-compete clauses under the Canada Labour Code and establish the Defence Investment Agency for military procurement. Additionally, the bill would transfer authority over air travel complaints to the Minister of Transport and make various other administrative changes across government.

Official text (opens in a new tab)

89 statements

Blake Richards, Airdrie—Cochrane

Conservative

Linked statement

“The government is cutting services and benefits for veterans, including long-term care and pensions. Cuts to the office that helps veterans appeal denied benefits will create five-year wait times. The government needs to stop denying that these cuts are harming veterans.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 41 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I would be ashamed of myself if I was to stand and ask a question like that. I understand the role that the parliamentary secretary plays to defend a Prime Minister who is indefensible, frankly. However, when he stands up and tries to tell us that $4 billion is for cuts to cannabis, how much cannabis are the Liberals planning on handing out to veterans? That is a heck of a lot of cannabis. Another thing we are hearing from veterans in long-term care is that they are being shortchanged. We hear from RCMP veterans who are having their pensions reduced. We hear about cuts to the bureau of pension advocates, which is the group that helps veterans get their benefits when they are denied by the government far too often. These are the kinds of impacts. The BPA cuts alone will mean five-year wait times for veterans to finally get the benefits they have worked so hard to deserve. How can the member stand up and try to pretend that somehow we are manufacturing this? I guess all Canadians, veterans and everyone else who is crying about all of these horrible cuts are all rage baiting too, apparently. However, I will tell members right now that it is the government that is mistaken and it will pay the price for it.

Tamara Jansen, Cloverdale—Langley City

Conservative
“Veterans need real support and services, not more government announcements. This budget adds debt and pushes interest payments over $50 billion a year. How can we trust the government will support veterans when so much money is wasted paying interest?”
  • A repeated line

    “Canadians do not need more announcements.”

    Said 3 times by 3 members since June 1.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, one of a federal government’s values is how it treats those who served our country. Veterans do not need more announcements. They need timely services, reliable benefits and access to the supports they have earned. With this budget adding more debt and pushing interest costs above $50 billion a year, could my colleague explain how Canadians can have confidence that veterans will remain a priority when so much of the government’s revenue is being consumed simply by paying interest on past spending?

Blake Richards, Airdrie—Cochrane

Conservative
“This government has never made veterans a priority, and this budget proves it. Too many veterans are homeless and using food banks. The government is not giving them the help they have earned.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, the first thing I would say to that is there is a bit of a premise to the question that I would take disagreement with. The member mentioned the idea of veterans remaining a priority. I would argue that veterans have never been a priority for the government. This budget only further proves that. I mentioned already some of the things that we have seen cut, but the member, very correctly, raises some of the concerns that we see among Canadians more broadly, like food bank usage and homelessness. These things affect veterans, unfortunately, even more acutely than the general population of Canadians as a whole, so they are feeling those things worse than ever. However, when they go to seek the help they need because of the service they have given to our country and the injury that has caused them, we owe them as a country to make sure we are there for them. We have not been there for them. Under the government, as the member mentions, far too many veterans are homeless, using food banks and cannot get the help they deserve, need and have earned from the government.

Sébastien Lemire, Abitibi—Témiscamingue

Bloc Québécois
“I am worried about the part of this budget bill about government contracts. It lets the government use Crown corporations to get around normal spending rules. Crown corporations do not have the same rules for accountability as government departments.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I feel like I am unrecognizable today. In summary, I have concerns when I look at Bill C‑31, especially the part about public contracts. The bill says that this division amends the financial administration to authorize the government to make regulations with respect to the conditions under which contracts may be entered into, despite any other act of Parliament. Essentially, the main amendment seems to be adding Crown corporations. Are federal Crown corporations becoming the new way to get around the Financial Administration Act? We just finished studying this at the Standing Committee on Public Accounts. Clearly, Crown corporations are like black holes: Accountability is not the same as within a department. Is it still a democracy when the government skirts the law and uses Crown corporations for expenses that the government should be incurring itself? I would like to ask my colleague that question.

Blake Richards, Airdrie—Cochrane

Conservative
“The government is not answering these good questions because it wants to hide what it is doing. It is helping its own friends instead of helping Canadians.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 39 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I will just say that the member raised a lot of very good questions. They are questions that do not have answers. I think the reason they do not have answers is that the government is deliberately trying to avoid being accountable and being transparent. This is another way, just another way of many, to reward all of its friends, all the Liberal insiders, and it is being done at the expense of Canadians.

Braedon Clark, Sackville—Bedford—Preston

Liberal
“I want the House to pass this bill. It sets up a new agency to buy military equipment faster and buy more of it from Canadian companies. The world is more dangerous now, and our old way of buying military gear takes too long.”
  • A repeated line

    “Rearm and reinvest in the Canadian Armed Forces.”

    Said 5 times by 5 members since June 1.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, the world is changing rapidly, profoundly and, in many ways, irreversibly. It is more divided, more volatile and more dangerous than at any point since the end of the Cold War. In this new reality, the assumptions that shaped decades of Canadian defence and security policy no longer apply, and the threats we face are no longer just hypothetical scenarios. At the same time, we are dealing with rapidly changing methods of warfare, driven by the proliferation of drones, artificial intelligence, space-based weapons and new technologies that are still emerging. The world has changed, and Canada must change with it. That is why our government is strengthening Canada’s sovereign capabilities and critical sectors and deepening co-operation with trusted partners. To keep us safe and secure, we are making generational investments to rebuild, rearm, and reinvest in the Canadian Armed Forces, which will have a profound impact on my home province of Nova Scotia, where 20% of Canadian Armed Forces members are stationed. With a bold new approach to defence procurement, we are transforming how we make those investments so that our military has what it needs, when it needs it, and so that Canadians benefit economically from those investments. This transformation is firmly anchored in Canada’s first-ever defence industrial strategy, which was launched this past February. It is a landmark framework that sets a long-term vision for how we can strengthen our defence capabilities while building a more resilient, innovative and competitive industrial base right here at home. At the centre of that strategy is the Defence Investment Agency. The agency plays a critical role in modernizing and accelerating defence procurement, ensuring we can deliver the right capabilities to the Canadian Armed Forces when they are needed most. At the same time, it is driving stronger investment, deeper partnerships and more meaningful engagement with the Canadian defence industry, helping to position Canadian companies to grow, innovate and contribute to both national security and economic prosperity. Let us be honest. In the past, Canada’s defence procurement system has been slow, complicated and fragmented, particularly when it comes to decision-making and accountability. We have all seen this movie too many times before, with our most critical defence procurement projects taking decades to complete in some cases. What we have in this country is a procurement system that at times struggles to respond to urgent operational needs, and this has come at a cost to the readiness of our armed forces, as well as our defence industrial base. Of course, this is not due to a lack of commitment or professionalism; rather, it is a reflection of a system that was simply not built for the dangerous environment we face today. Canadians last year elected a government that would focus on building one strong economy. In doing so, we created Canada’s first defence industrial strategy, which establishes a whole-of-government approach to transform Canada’s defence industry and procurement system. It rightly prioritizes Canadian suppliers and materials wherever possible. It invests in Canadian innovation, commercialization and export potential, and it provides industry with a more streamlined, predictable and transparent demand outlook. The goal is straightforward: to strengthen Canada’s strategic autonomy while building prosperity here at home. This strategy is going to get us there. Over the next decade, we project that we will see an increase in Canada’s defence exports by 50% and that we will raise the share, critically, of defence acquisitions awarded to Canadian firms to 70%, supporting our homegrown businesses and innovators in the defence space. The size, capability and competitiveness of Canada’s defence industry as a result will, of course, grow. That means more high-quality and high-paying jobs for Canadians, from aerospace engineers to cyber specialists and from advanced manufacturing to digital technologies. The Defence Investment Agency is the engine that will turn this strategy into reality. The DIA has a clear and focused mandate to re-equip our military faster and more effectively while leveraging defence investments to strengthen Canada’s defence industrial base and attract private capital into the sector. It is designed to accelerate procurement timelines and bring sustained leadership and accountability to the largest defence investments made in generations in this country. The agency in its current form was launched in October 2025 as a special operating agency within Public Services and Procurement Canada. In a very short time, it has already demonstrated its value, advancing major procurements such as Arctic over-the-horizon radar and the Canadian patrol submarine project, which are foundational to the defence of Canada, which, of course, has the longest coastline in the world. We know that the Defence Investment Agency, to fully deliver on its mandate, must be established as a stand-alone entity with the authorities, governance and agility required to match the scale of our government’s ambition. That has always been the plan. In our spring economic update, our government proposed $103.8 million over five years, starting in this fiscal year, and $22.3 million ongoing, to establish and operate the DIA as a stand-alone organization. Today, we debate a second act to implement certain provisions of the budget, which was tabled in Parliament on November 4 of last year, specifically on the defence and national security production and procurement act. To be clear, the legislation is not about bureaucracy. It is about capability. It is about speed. It is about aligning procurement with strategy, industry with security and investment with outcomes. This includes actively advancing initiatives aimed at reducing red tape and improving efficiency, which would ultimately reduce duplication, increase time savings and streamline processes. These initiatives would allow us to better align with our G7 and NATO partners, which, as we know, is more important than ever, as today’s global challenges, including international peace and security, global economic stability and growth, and the digital transition, require Canadians and allies to work together to find shared solutions. That is why Canada is working with G7 and NATO partners to build a new era of collaboration, one rooted in trusted partnerships, competitive economies and innovation that delivers for people and businesses. This is especially critical when it comes to the defence sector. This moment in history demands seriousness of purpose and a new approach to defence procurement, which is at the heart of our debate tonight. Since day one, our government has acted, and we are seeing results. Last fiscal year alone, Canada invested more than $63 billion in defence, the largest increase in generations. In March, Canada reached the NATO alliance’s benchmark of spending 2% of GDP on defence five years earlier than planned, and we are on a path to meet the 5% NATO target by 2035. That is imperative because when Canada invests in defence, we are investing in Canadians, our workers and our innovators, and all of our future responsibilities. The changes we propose are necessary, timely and forward-looking. They recognize that Canada’s security and economic strength are inseparable and that we must be able to act quickly and decisively in a more dangerous world. By establishing the Defence Investment Agency as a stand-alone entity, we are building a procurement system fit for today and for the future. We are backing our armed forces with the tools they need, and we are backing Canadian industry and business with opportunity and certainty, helping to ultimately establish Canada’s place in the world as a strong, reliable and capable ally. For all of these reasons, I urge all members of the House to support the Defence Investment Agency and, as a result, support a stronger, safer and more resilient Canada.

Martin Champoux, Drummond

Bloc Québécois
“I want the government to list any wins it has had over the past year against Donald Trump and his threats of tariffs.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, my question will be very brief. I am going to ask my Liberal colleague to list all the major victories the government has scored against Donald Trump, his tariffs and his tariff threats. If he could just quickly list all the victories, all the gains the government has made against Donald Trump over the past year, that would be great.

Braedon Clark, Sackville—Bedford—Preston

Liberal
“The defence industry is very important to Nova Scotia. The budget gives 63 billion dollars to it.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, my colleague’s question was very brief; I thank him for that. As I said in my speech, the defence industry is so important in Nova Scotia that the budget allocates $63 billion to it.

Grant Jackson, Brandon—Souris

Conservative
“I am asking if the House agrees to call the time 7:12 p.m.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, on a point of order, is it the will of the House to see the clock at 7:12 p.m.?

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 126

  1. Private Members' Business Offender Rehabilitation Act 7 statements
  2. Government Orders Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2 39 statements
  3. Government Orders Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2 16 statements
  4. Oral Questions The Economy 12 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Environment 6 statements
  6. Oral Questions The Economy 14 statements
  7. Oral Questions Industry 4 statements
  8. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  9. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions The Economy 18 statements
  11. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 3 statements
  12. Oral Questions The Environment 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Justice 6 statements
  15. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  16. Government Orders Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2 89 statements
  17. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 3 statements
  18. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 3 statements