“I want taxpayers to spend $200 million on this company's infrastructure. I promise it will make jobs -- 225,000 jobs if we do everything right. Canada needs to launch satellites. It's about sovereignty. We can't do that without this spending.”
What they said. What they meant.
Plain-language translations from the House of Commons.
Recent debates
8 latest topics
Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act
57 statements
Spring Economic Update 2026 Implementation Act
19 statements
Arab Heritage Month Act
5 statements
The Economy
15 statements
Government Priorities
2 statements
Government Priorities
2 statements
Housing
12 statements
The Environment
2 statements
Government Orders
Main Estimates, 2026-27
A bill to implement parts of Budget 2025, including changes to tax rules, increased defence spending, and various other measures. During debate, while the Liberals highlighted positive economic indicators and the importance of investing in space and aerospace industries, the Conservatives, Bloc, and NDP raised concerns about wasteful spending, budget cuts to science and research, unethical corporate bailouts, fraud, and the government's circumventing of local input and legislative processes.
“You're celebrating how great things are. But the government cut help for seniors age 65 to 74. The Bloc wants to increase everyone's pensions by 10% instead. It wouldn't cost too much. Why not do it? Why ignore seniors who contributed to the economy?”
“Our election platform said we would give more money to seniors over 75. We won the election and did that. Now you're mad we didn't increase pensions for younger seniors too? We made a promise and followed through.”
“We must launch rockets to protect Canada's sovereignty. Only two places are good enough for rockets. I want us to use them. It's important.”
“I wish the Conservatives had a Nova Scotia MP who agrees with me on rocket launch pads. Maybe then they'd change their mind. Look, this is good for Atlantic Canada. My argument would only look stronger if my opponents agreed with it. There's an ocean beside it so it's the best place to have a rocket pad. Also the Premier of Nova Scotia likes it and he's a Progressive Conservative.”
“The company the government injected money into was failing. It had huge losses and almost no revenue or cash. The government's $20 million let a shareholder cash out $1.8 million from shares that used to be worthless. The taxpayer just bailed out a company about to go bankrupt.”
“Don't ask me, ask Nova Scotia. I want to spend money on this space company. It's good for Canada even though the company was failing before we gave it your money.”
“You should feel guilty. Your museum says you care about human rights. Now your government isn't giving us new anti-slavery laws. How can you accept that?”
“Don't worry about specifics. The Prime Minister is saying nice things every day. Surely that means we're doing enough.”
“You already praised our astronaut program. Now I want you to say it again. Say why Canada must spend to launch our own rockets and to do our own space research, on top of working with other countries.”
“I want you to agree with me. Canada must spend to launch its own rockets. Canada must not rely on private companies like Elon Musk's to launch our satellites. Canadian government must be able to choose the space projects to fund. This space program must help Canadian industry and jobs.”
“I want to attack this spaceport project. It looks like a suspicious use of taxpayer money. The company was on the verge of financial collapse. But the Liberal government gave it lots of taxpayer money anyway. The company has many connections to Liberal politicians and former staffers. I think this company got money because of its Liberal connections. Not because it deserved the money. The project doesn't make practical sense. The government shouldn't have funded this.”
“I want to discredit the other side's attack. attach that word to them instead. I want to paint them as seeing corruption everywhere. That way it won't stick when they say it. I want a gotcha by pointing out a conservative who supports this spending. I think that should shield us from any blame.”
“I want to keep saying corruption because I think that benefits my party. I want to keep saying well-connected insiders because I think that benefits my party. I want to keep saying all this over and over because I think it makes us look good. I want more transparency and accountability because I think that benefits my party. I'm repeating my top lines.”
“I'm filling time with kind words and saying nothing anyone could pin down later. I'm just repeating applause lines: small businesses need help, the economy is threatened, my region needs me. I want to cheer for a program that spends money in my riding.”
“I want to blame the government for causing problems for businesses. I want to be seen as supporting businesses in my riding. I want the government to get out of the way and let businesses flourish on their own. The government should create an environment for success, not create success itself.”
“I'm upset about job losses in my riding. I want to spend $200 million on a space launch site there instead of Nova Scotia. Maybe comparing it to famous Cape Canaveral will help justify that.”
“I'm not impressed by the launch site. It's small compared to the famous American one. I want to keep criticizing this company for getting a lot of taxpayer dollars. I think the government is hiding something.”
“I'm outraged that the government signed a lease that costs taxpayers $20 million a year. I think a lot of Canadians agree with me that this is a bad deal. The government is not taking this seriously. I want the government to explain itself.”
“A site got picked in a Liberal riding. Lots of Liberals had their fingers in it. Even the Space Agency president says she was never asked about the site choice. The minister won't explain it to me directly. Instead he wants to waste time introducing me to astronauts for some reason. All this stinks of a financial scandal. The Conservatives will stand up against it.”