“Yesterday was a very good day for Alberta and all of Canada. I want the member to join me in thanking the Canadians who are working hard to build the country, develop our resources, and grow our economy.”

“Mr. Speaker, let us agree that Canada had a very good day yesterday. It was a very good day for Albertans and a very good day for Canadians. That member will want to join with the government in thanking all Albertans who participated in this debate, but more importantly, those Albertans and other Canadians who are now going to continue putting their shoulder to the wheel to build this great country, to develop our resources, to create a future here at home and to create the kind of growth that gives us the best quality of life and makes Canada the best country in the world.”

• Didn't answer
  ?

  Government answer in Question Period

  Relevance 0 of 100

  None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

  See full analysis →
• Little substance
  ?

  Government answer in Question Period

  Signal 0 of 100

  Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

  See full analysis →

“The Prime Minister is doing his job. He is building our economy and trading with reliable partners around the world, just as we promised in the last election.”

“Mr. Speaker, our colleague should be very reassured that the Prime Minister is doing exactly that: his job. He is building a strong Canadian economy. He is diversifying our trading relationships with reliable partners around the world. He is doing what we campaigned on in the last election. I know the hon. member may prefer to forget the last election. We remember clearly the commitment we made to Canadians to control what we can control, build a strong economy here at home the right way and work with Canadian workers and businesses to grow the economy.”

• Vague
  ?

  Government answer in Question Period

  Clarity 37 of 100

  Much of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.

  See full analysis →

“I am working on this problem, and so is the minister for southern Ontario development. We gave money to Mariposa Dairy, and we will give more to keep the business safe.”

“Mr. Speaker, I would like to commend my colleague for his important question. I am indeed seized with the issue. The minister in charge of FedDev Ontario is as well. FedDev has provided funding, we will provide more funding, and we will work together on the solution because we need to make sure that Mariposa Dairy is secured.”

• Vague
  ?

  Government answer in Question Period

  Clarity 36 of 100

  Much of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.

  See full analysis →
• Answered
  ?

  Government answer in Question Period

  Relevance 100 of 100

  Of this answer, 100% addressed the question that was asked.

  See full analysis →