Business of Supply

The debate focused on the government’s $600 million measure intended to support Canadian local media and culture. The Liberal government stated that the funds were an interim measure, provided on top of existing support for cultural organizations like Radio-Canada, while a long-term plan is developed. Opponents agreed that the funding was necessary but argued that Canadian taxpayers should not bear the cost, insisting that large tech companies should be the ones to fund the industry. They criticized the cancellation of the Digital Services Tax, stating the $600 million was insufficient compensation and questioned why the government had delayed delivering the promised funds to the sector.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

4 statements

Burton Bailey, Red Deer

Conservative
“The previous Conservative government recognized Quebec as a nation. Quebec asks for more independence than other provinces get. I am asking the member if he agrees that provinces like Alberta also deserve more control over their own affairs, like immigration, instead of federal control.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Relevance 26 of 100

    None of this question addressed the preceding speech or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it was the Conservative government, under then prime minister Harper, that recognized Quebec as a nation. Culture, language and shared ancestry all played a part in determining what a nation is. With this in mind, the province of Quebec demands a level of autonomy that other provinces do not benefit from in Canada. Would my colleague agree that the other provinces in Canada, such as Alberta, deserve more autonomy, away from the heavy hand of the federal government, in determining what is the best direction for their province, as with immigration, for example?

Dalwinder Gill, Calgary McKnight

Conservative
“The minister promised 600 million dollars in immediate support, but people are still waiting four months later. If the government is running such a large deficit, it should at least deliver the money it promised.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the minister promised $600 million in immediate support, yet more than four months later the sector is still waiting. Does the member agree that a government running such a massive deficit should at least be able to deliver the funding it promised?

Burton Bailey, Red Deer

Conservative
“How many empty promises will it take for the Liberals to admit that announcements are not results?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the simple question I would like to ask the hon. parliamentary secretary is this: How many empty promises will it take before the Liberals admit that announcements and press conferences are not the same as results?

Ted Falk, Provencher

Conservative
“The Liberals keep breaking their promises. They promised an earlier bill would get big projects built, but it failed, so now they need another bill. The Prime Minister also promised a trade deal with the United States and failed to deliver it. Canadians are tired of promises that never lead to results.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this question addressed the preceding speech or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Question or comment in debate

    Signal 37 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we talk a lot about broken promises. I remember it was only about 18 months ago when the member across the way was speaking very passionately about what Bill C-5 would do and how it would accomplish all these big projects. He talked about the promises that were made at that time. Unfortunately, now we are going to also be looking at Bill C-39, because apparently Bill C-5 did not do it. It was another broken promise. The Prime Minister promised he would have a trade deal with the United States, saying that he was a master, world-class negotiator. We know that has not happened. We have had a lot of broken promises by the Liberals. It reminds me of a farmer in spring after he has his seed in the ground. The member for Sarnia—Lambton was talking about agriculture, which made me think of that. The seed is in the ground, and the farmer sees a cloud on the horizon. He knows there is rain coming, but then the cloud comes and there is no rain. That is how I think a lot of Canadians feel with the broken promises: There is a promise of rain, but nothing comes.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 153

  1. Government Orders Business of Supply 51 statements
  2. Government Orders Business of Supply 64 statements
  3. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 2 statements
  4. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 6 statements
  5. Oral Questions Government Priorities 6 statements
  6. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 14 statements
  7. Oral Questions Canadian Identity and Culture 4 statements
  8. Oral Questions Canada Revenue Agency 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions The Economy 6 statements
  10. Oral Questions Employment 2 statements
  11. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 15 statements
  12. Oral Questions Employment 3 statements
  13. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions Sports 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Finance 6 statements
  16. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions Points of Order 2 statements
  18. Government Orders Business of Supply 31 statements
  19. Oral Questions Government Priorities 2 statements
  20. Oral Questions The Economy 6 statements
  21. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  22. Government Orders Business of Supply 30 statements
  23. Private Members' Business Canada Labour Code 4 statements
  24. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  25. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  26. Oral Questions Business of the House 2 statements