Safe Social Media Act

Bill C-34, Safe Social Media Act · Second reading · now at committee in the House Where it stands

What Bill C-34 would do

The bill would create the Digital Safety Act and set up the Digital Safety Commission of Canada to oversee it. Operators of regulated social media and chatbot services would have to mitigate exposure to harmful content, label synthetic content, and protect children through design features and age limits. Platforms would also have to remove non-consensual intimate content and child sexual abuse material, and submit digital safety plans to the commission.

Official text (opens in a new tab)

11 statements

Gabriel Ste-Marie, Joliette—Manawan

Bloc Québécois
“I have two questions about this bill. Should it include online gaming? How will we make sure people under 16 follow the rules?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I would like to ask my hon. colleague two quick questions. Would it have been appropriate to extend the bill’s scope to cover things like online gaming? How can we ensure that people under the age of 16 comply with the bill’s provisions?

Mario Simard, Jonquière—Hébertville—Pays-des-Bleuets

Bloc Québécois
“This bill is important, but its rules treat all provinces the same. It needs to include digital education for young people and respect Quebec's distinct language and culture. The federal government should be required to work with the provinces on this.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this question addressed the preceding speech or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, when one looks at the legislation, the many implications it could have become pretty clear. If the government wants to regulate certain online platforms, for instance, it has to include some form of education for young people. It also means taking action on content that may differ depending on whether one is francophone or anglophone. What I find especially unfortunate is that the bill does not include any obligation for the federal government to consult with the provinces or seek any kind of alignment, particularly with Quebec, which is a distinct society and has a different culture. Would my colleague agree that the government has missed the mark a bit with the one-size-fits-all measures set out in the bill? That said, I completely agree on the importance of the bill.

Gabriel Ste-Marie, Joliette—Manawan

Bloc Québécois
“A parliamentary committee said the government must respect provincial powers over youth protection when dealing with social media. I want the member to explain how this bill respects the powers of Quebec and the provinces, and how the government consulted with them.”
  • A repeated line

    “In addressing the effects of influencers and social media on children and adolescents.”

    Said 4 times by 3 members since October 29.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, when the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage considered the issue, it adopted the following recommendation: That the Government of Canada, in addressing the effects of influencers and social media on children and adolescents—and while recognizing the jurisdiction and primacy of the provinces in matters relating to social services and youth protection—adopt an asymmetrical and flexible approach. I would like to ask my hon. colleague how, with Bill C-34, the government is taking an asymmetrical and flexible approach that recognizes the jurisdiction and primacy of Quebec and the provinces and how the government consulted and worked with Quebec and the provinces on this bill.

Marie-Hélène Gaudreau, Laurentides—Labelle

Bloc Québécois
“We need laws to protect young people online. But Quebec should decide these rules for young people in Quebec.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, indeed, the time has come to deal with this situation. My question is this. In our society, which level of government is ultimately responsible for protecting young people? I am thinking of the young people in Quebec, for example. Would my colleague agree that, while legislation is needed, it is up to the Quebec nation to have a serious discussion about these legislative choices?

Marie-Hélène Gaudreau, Laurentides—Labelle

Bloc Québécois
“I support the government looking into rules for young people on social media. Quebec's premier showed early leadership on this, and other countries are looking at doing it too.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I welcome the fact that the government is looking at regulating social media among young people. I also commend the leadership shown by the Premier of Quebec, who was one of the first people in Quebec to raise this issue. Other western countries are also considering this. An hon. member: Oh, oh!

Marie-Hélène Gaudreau, Laurentides—Labelle

Bloc Québécois
“I want us to pass this bill to committee. Social media companies design their apps to keep people hooked, which hurts children's mental and physical health. Just like we regulate tobacco and cannabis, we need rules to protect kids online. A committee needs to study these rules carefully and make sure the federal government does not step into Quebec's powers.”
Official Hansard

I think I am bothering one of my colleagues. I hope it is not just because I am speaking French. Some countries are taking a bold approach. Others are waiting to see what kind of legislation is passed and may take their cue from what we do here. I am certainly not the only one who sees people my age in my circle of friends who go into a trance as soon as they open Instagram or TikTok, although that app is not as popular as it once was. Of course, there are also the short videos on Facebook. The tech giants understand human nature. They understand the weaknesses of the human mind, how our attention span works and, most importantly, how to keep us hooked. They know how to get our attention and feed us content that can make us lose all sense of time. I do not think there is a single person here who has not experienced this. In fact, many of the people who created these platforms admit that they too fall victim to their own tactics and this game. Our partners, our children, our friends—all are susceptible. The difference is that we are adults and we have free will. In theory, we are equipped to understand these dangers but, as with any addiction, it is difficult to break free, especially once we have lost track of time. Now, let us think about all the 12-year-old boys and girls who are just starting junior high. Their parents buy them a cellphone because they want to keep track of where they are going and because junior high brings with it a new kind of freedom. Parents also want to be able to contact their children. There are all sorts of good reasons for these kids to have cellphones. We are no longer talking about the old flip phones that no one wanted to send text messages on because it took too long. Kids can now get on the Internet with their phones. They have access to social media. There are apps to block social media, but let us be serious. Young people want a digital presence. It is important to point that out. We obviously have to keep up with the times. That is why Bill C-34 is so important. Digital communication is at now at the centre of our lives. If we do not regulate it, we are leaving young people to navigate these platforms alone, platforms where they may be exposed to cyber-bullying, content that is not age appropriate and mechanisms designed to keep them online into the wee hours of the morning. I remember when I was old enough to get my driver’s licence, I was told to save my money so that I could buy myself a car. A car does not come for free and it comes with rules. It is important to know how to navigate this digital world because, even though it may be intangible, there are still public health and safety issues to consider. There is also something that is not as easy to pick up on among young people: young people who isolate themselves, who become withdrawn and whose mental health could be affected by online pressure and interactions. When I talk about interactions, I think about the fact that every second we are in front of a screen adds up. Screen time could even take the place of time spent sleeping. We also know that the amount of time spent doing physical activity and being physically present with others is decreasing. We all know that sedentary lifestyles can be harmful to physical health. In addition, online pressure and interactions can take a heavy toll on mental health. These effects are real and cannot be ignored. The pandemic reminded us just how much young people need to interact with others in order to learn to socialize. When so many of our interactions are happening only online, socialization becomes more difficult and some people may withdraw into themselves. I am sure that my very attentive colleagues agree. We must learn from what is happening now and help both current and future generations develop a healthy relationship with digital tools without becoming dependent on them. On social media, young people see digitally enhanced bodies and carefully curated lives. Success often appears effortless, but comparing ourselves to those images can leave us feeling that we are not attractive enough, popular enough or successful enough. In fact, a study of just over 21,000 youth aged 10 to 17 in six countries, including Canada, found that 55% were dissatisfied with their appearance. One could argue that not many of us are satisfied, but dissatisfaction tends to increase as time spent on social media increases. We already use this approach for other products. For instance, tobacco advertising, packaging and warnings are regulated. The same goes for cannabis. There is a minimum age, and marketing aimed at young people is tightly restricted. With social media, the risks are different, but the principle is the same: Protect people and prevent harm through regulations. Limiting young people’s access is therefore a public health measure, not arbitrary control. We need to make that distinction. We in the Bloc Québécois think it is normal and preferable for laws to adapt quickly to technological changes. Our laws are lagging far behind, and this gap must be closed to keep up with the accelerating pace of AI. Even the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights has called for rules to protect children across all social media. These are the rules we are being called upon to discuss and debate as we study Bill C-34. I hope that the discussions will be very constructive once the bill passes this stage and that the committee will come up with effective measures to keep our young people on the right track. What rules should we bring in to regulate social media and protect young people? Which level of government within the Canadian federation has the jurisdiction to address this challenge? These are questions that need to be asked as this bill proposes a federal regulatory framework for social media and chatbots. This bill would also impose a number of duties on digital platforms, including a duty to protect minors and to make certain content inaccessible. This will, in fact, help to educate parents. The bill places obligations on these platforms, including requirements to remove content depicting sexual victimization and non-consensual intimate images. It proposes a range of principles, obligations and enforcement mechanisms aimed at holding digital platforms accountable, protecting minors and ensuring online safety. The Bloc Québécois supports these objectives and sees the positive side of a number of the principles and proposed solutions. However, each of these measures will require careful examination. I repeat that, in committee, I hope we will ensure that our decisions are guided by science, facts and research, and not simply guided by assumptions or, I dare say, partisan politics. As the Bloc Québécois has always maintained, we must also ensure that the federal government does not encroach on areas of jurisdiction that belong to Quebec and the provinces. In conclusion, in 2024 and 2025, Quebec’s National Assembly established a Select Committee on the Impacts of Screens and Social Media on Young People’s Health and Development. Let us draw on the work of our counterparts to ensure a healthy digital environment for our young people.

Marie-Hélène Gaudreau, Laurentides—Labelle

Bloc Québécois
“I agree that we need to focus on prevention. Social media platforms use strategies that harm young people. We need rules and more funding to protect our children's physical and mental health.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, what a great question from my colleague. I come from the community sector, a sector that is stretched thin in Quebec, and I know that prevention is key. Indeed, when we see the strategies being used by platforms that turn young people into zombies, we understand that safeguards need to be implemented. We need to invest more and develop a legislative framework that protects the physical and mental health of our young people.

Gabriel Ste-Marie, Joliette—Manawan

Bloc Québécois
“This bill deals with areas that belong to Quebec and the provinces, like social services and child protection. I want to know if the government worked closely with them and consulted them enough before introducing this bill.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this question addressed the preceding speech or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I congratulate and thank my colleague and friend, the member for Laurentides—Labelle, for her great speech. The topic is important, and she addressed it with heartfelt conviction. The issue covered by this bill touches on many areas of jurisdiction that belong to Quebec and the provinces, including social services, youth protection and other related sectors. In my colleague’s view, has the government worked closely enough with Quebec and the provinces on this matter? Did it adequately consult the other levels of government before introducing this bill?

Marie-Hélène Gaudreau, Laurentides—Labelle

Bloc Québécois
“I support this bill and hope it passes. When it goes to committee, we need to consult Quebec and the provinces. They have scientific research and good ideas that can help improve it.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, that is exactly the question we are asking. We are perfectly comfortable with the bill and we hope it will pass into law. Once it is referred to committee, I hope that Quebec and the provinces will be consulted, considering the research they conducted, the evidence they gathered from scientists and the measures they implemented that we need to use for inspiration. The government may have consulted the provinces to some degree, but a lot more such consultation is needed.

Marie-Hélène Gaudreau, Laurentides—Labelle

Bloc Québécois
“We need to pass and set up this law quickly. Artificial intelligence is everywhere in our lives now, and Quebec's leaders have good expertise to help with this.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, indeed, the new government at the National Assembly of Quebec includes people who are very competent. I must say that the MNA for the Laurentians, Anne Nguyen, has a great deal of expertise. I cannot wait for the bill to see the light of day because it is high time this law was implemented quickly, especially given that artificial intelligence is so pervasive in our lives.

Marie-Hélène Gaudreau, Laurentides—Labelle

Bloc Québécois
“The government needs to talk to public safety groups and all the provinces and territories about this bill. It would probably get very positive feedback. But the federal government also needs to mind its own business.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 30 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, in less than 30 seconds, I will say that the government needs to consult public safety stakeholders and every province and territory. I think the government will then get feedback that would likely be very positive. That said, I would remind the House that it is also important for the government to focus on its own affairs.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 158

  1. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 38 statements
  2. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 81 statements
  3. Oral Questions International Trade 18 statements
  4. Oral Questions Finance 14 statements
  5. Oral Questions Justice 8 statements
  6. Oral Questions Public Safety 2 statements
  7. Oral Questions International Trade 2 statements
  8. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 8 statements
  9. Oral Questions Government Appointments 5 statements
  10. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 7 statements
  11. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Taxation 2 statements
  14. Oral Questions The Environment 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Business of the House 2 statements
  17. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 23 statements
  18. Oral Questions The Economy 2 statements
  19. Government Orders Safe Social Media Act 42 statements
  20. Oral Questions Intergovernmental Relations 4 statements
  21. Oral Questions Public Safety 2 statements
  22. Oral Questions Families, Children and Social Development 2 statements
  23. Private Members' Business National Strategy for Soil Health Act 16 statements
  24. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  25. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  26. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements