MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Bienvenu-Olivier Ntumba

Follow by RSS

Ntumba supports Bill C-39 to modernize supply chains and fast-track infrastructure, including the Contrecoeur port project, while also pushing the Build Canada Homes Act to address the housing crisis. He advocates for digital safety through Bill C-34 and the accountability of large corporations. He frames these legislative necessities broadly, stating, “we must assess all of the risks associated with digital spaces and ensure that the challenges that young people are already facing are dealt with on a daily basis.”Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
A
90 / 100 over 26 statements
Signal 86 / 100
Relevance 88 / 100
Respect 100 / 100
Clarity 88 / 100
Averaged over the 26 of 35 statements graded so far.

In their own words

Loses points more than most for

Loses points less than most for Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.Less often than most members.What the tags mean

Says again and again

Statements 35

Government Orders ·

Safe Social Media Act

In response to a question from Guillaume Deschênes-Thériault

“I held a meeting in my riding about these bills. Many parents and local officials came, and they want us to pass these bills quickly.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, that was the first event I held in my riding this year in relation to the two bills. I am talking about Bill C‑36 and Bill C‑34. I was surprised by the response I received from my constituents when I launched the call to consult the people of Mont-Saint-Bruno—L’Acadie. The response from parents was overwhelming. I even had some other local elected officials show up to share their point of view and explain why it is important to quickly implement these bills.

In response to a question from Michael Coteau

“Mental health problems come from many things. We cannot blame social media for every problem young people face. As parents and leaders, we must look at all the online risks and help young people with the daily challenges they already face.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 47 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Reply to a debate question

    Clarity 48 of 100

    Much of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for his great question. As I said in my speech, it is important to recognize that mental health is influenced by many factors. Social media cannot be held responsible for all the problems young people face. As parents, as elected officials, we must assess all of the risks associated with digital spaces and ensure that the challenges that young people are already facing are dealt with on a daily basis.

In response to a question from Natilien Joseph

“This bill creates an independent commission to watch online companies and punish those that break the rules. The government will not be able to interfere with its decisions.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for his great question. The commission bolsters the credibility of this bill or the future act. It will prevent any interference from the Government of Canada when it comes to decisions related to the applicability of the bill. The commission will have free rein to monitor these digital companies and take action if they fail to comply with the provisions set out in this bill. As I said earlier, non-compliant companies will be subject to the measures set out in this bill’s accountability framework.

In response to a question from Guillaume Deschênes-Thériault

“I support this bill because it creates an independent commission to enforce the rules. It will check how companies verify users' identities. Companies that break the law will face a 3% penalty.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, one of the things I like in this bill is that the commission will ensure that the provisions are applied and enforced. This is an independent commission that will closely monitor identity verification and ensure that the law is enforced. If the law is not obeyed, companies will be held liable and subject to a 3% penalty.

In response to a question from Guillaume Deschênes-Thériault

“I want this bill passed to keep children safe online and prevent harm before it happens. It will hold companies accountable by fining them up to 3% of their global revenue if they do not protect kids.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, as I said very clearly in my speech, through this bill, we must show them that we are prepared to take action not only when harm occurs, but also before it occurs. This bill is not only preventative. It is also coupled with corporate accountability. As I said in my speech, children are not safe only at home and at school. When they leave those settings, they are exposed to the digital world. We need to make sure that our children are protected and safe in that world. If they are not, companies will be held accountable, and their fees could amount to 3% of global revenues under the provisions of the bill.

In response to a question from Natilien Joseph

“This bill holds social media companies accountable. If they do not follow the rules, a new commission will fine them 3%.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, this bill is not going to impose bans without consequences. These companies know that. We have included penalties of 3% if they fail to reliably implement everything contained in this bill. There will be 3% penalties. This bill requires accountability. We take comfort in the fact that if companies fail to comply with or respect this bill, they will be penalized by the commission that will be established.

In response to a question from Michael Coteau

“I talked to parents in my riding about this bill. They want these rules because it will protect children's mental health from shared private videos and pictures.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, that question is very much like one that a parent asked me recently when I was at the first meeting about this bill in Saint‑Basile‑le‑Grand. The parents were very pleased that we were able to meet with them. They made it clear that it was time for Canada to act and that we had made the right decision. Parents shared their concerns with us. In no uncertain terms, they called for regulation. They feel this bill will address mental health concerns by providing much more robust protection against unauthorized images and the proliferation of intimate videos.

In response to a question from Guillaume Deschênes-Thériault

“I want this bill to pass. It stops online harm without banning platforms by making companies follow safety rules. It will keep young people safer on the internet and reassure parents.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, that is a good question. I do agree with my colleague’s comment. This bill is intended to prevent harm. It also enables online companies to structure their operations to comply with the Government of Canada’s framework. Once this bill is passed, young people who go online will be exposed to a much safer digital environment with stronger safeguards. Young people will be in a safer environment, and parents will have greater confidence that their government is acting responsibly.

“I want the House to pass this bill. It stops anyone under 16 from having a social media account unless the platform is proven safe. It also makes tech companies quickly remove harmful content, like child abuse and private pictures shared without consent, or face big fines. Our kids are facing rising mental health problems and online exploitation. Social media companies make money from our children, and they must be forced to keep them safe.”
  • A repeated line

    “The bill would address these gaps by clarifying that non-consensual distribution of intimate images includes realistic deepfakes, as well as criminalizing threats to distribute such material and increasing penalties for those offences.”

    Said 4 times by 4 members since June 4.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, the digital world now occupies an essential place in the lives of Canadians. It allows us to communicate, stay informed, learn and stay in touch with the people close to us. However, those opportunities also come with risks that we can no longer ignore. Today, children are accessing social media at increasingly younger ages, sometimes without their parents being fully aware. In a few clicks, a child can create an account, start using a platform and become exposed to harmful content while leaving his or her personal data behind. In this environment, we have to wonder whether we are doing enough to protect our young people. I had a chance to consult with the people of Mont-Saint-Bruno—L’Acadie to better understand their concerns about these bills. During our conversations, child protection was front and centre, especially in terms of the negative effects of social media. These discussions reminded me that this issue extends far beyond technology. It concerns our families, our schools, our communities and the health of the next generation. Parents want their children to reap the benefits of the digital world without being exposed to risks they are not yet able to recognize or manage on their own. As parliamentarians, we have a duty to listen and respond to their concerns. The data presented in connection with this bill are concerning. According to the available data, over the past decade, depression has doubled and anxiety has quadrupled among young Canadians aged 15 to 24. Research also shows that young people who have been victimized online report three times more suicidal thoughts. These numbers should make us think long and hard about the environment in which our young people are growing up. It is important to recognize that mental health is influenced by many factors. Social media cannot be held responsible for all the problems young people face. However, when the risks associated with digital spaces compound the challenges that teenagers already face, we cannot afford to look the other way. According to the data, Canadian police recorded 19,516 incidents of online child sexual exploitation in 2023. That is 59% higher than in 2022. Behind these numbers are victims, families and lives that have been profoundly disrupted. These numbers illustrate the scale of the challenge before us. They demonstrate why digital safety must be regarded as a collective responsibility and why our responses must keep pace with evolving risks. That is precisely why this bill represents a significant step forward. It proposes a shift from a primarily reactive approach to a more preventive one, in which platforms must assess the risks associated with their services and take measures to mitigate them. First, tech companies must be held accountable. This bill therefore requires the services in question to regularly assess certain risks associated with their operations, make changes to their design to minimize harm and implement clear reporting mechanisms. It also provides for the publication of digital safety plans to help Canadians better understand the risks inherent to these platforms and the measures taken to address them. This transparency is essential. Second, the bill proposes to strengthen the protection of children. It prohibits anyone under the age of 16 from owning a social media account, subject to exemptions for platforms that can demonstrate that their services are sufficiently safe for our young people. This approach is based on an important principle, specifically that protection must be built into the design of the services rather than simply added once a problem has emerged. At that age, young people are going through a critical stage of their development. Their identity is taking shape, their social relationships are becoming increasingly important, and their ability to cope with certain pressures continues to evolve. Repeated exposure to bullying, harmful content and mechanisms that encourage excessive use can pose an additional risk. Protecting young people does not mean denying their ability to think or make decisions. It means recognizing that the environment they grow in has to take their age and developmental stage into account. It is not just a matter of setting an age limit. It is also about encouraging companies to do more to create safer digital spaces. The bill provides for expedited procedures to make certain content inaccessible, particularly content that sexually victimizes children or survivors, as well as intimate images shared without consent. When such content circulates online, every share can prolong a victim’s suffering. Swift action can help limit its spread and prevent the affected person from being victimized again. Our policies must be able to respond to today’s risks while taking into account that technologies will continue to evolve. Some people may wonder whether these measures might infringe on freedom of expression or privacy. The answer is no. These concerns deserve a serious response. Freedom of expression is essential to our democracy. Canadians must be able to express their opinions, criticize the government, debate social issues and freely participate in public life. The bill is not intended to suppress legitimate debate or ordinary conversations. It targets specific categories of harmful content, particularly the sexual exploitation of children, the non-consensual sharing of intimate images, the bullying of children and any content that incites violence. Protecting young people and preserving freedom of expression should not be seen as opposing objectives. We can preserve the right to debate while requiring that businesses take action against serious harm. Privacy protections are just as essential. Age verification mechanisms must be implemented responsibly, with guarantees regarding the collection, use and destruction of personal data. The goal must be to protect young people, not create new risks to their privacy. To ensure obligations are met, the bill also establishes an independent digital safety commission. Among its responsibilities, the commission would review platforms’ safety plans, assess their age-verification mechanisms, support victims and ensure that platforms meet their obligations. It would also have the authority to impose financial penalties on platforms that fail to comply with the law. Under the proposed framework, these penalties could amount to up to 3% of a platform’s global revenue. This is important because obligations must be backed by credible enforcement mechanisms. I would now like to return to the consultations I had the opportunity to conduct with the people of Mont-Saint-Bruno—L’Acadie. The concerns raised by constituents remind us that the decisions we make here in the House of Commons have real consequences for families across the country. We must show them that we are prepared to act, not only when harm occurs, but also before it happens. We must ensure that platforms take responsibility, that victims have access to support and that parents are not left to navigate systems over which they have little or no control. Prevention, digital education, support for families and work with specialized organizations will remain vital, but we cannot use the fact that we are doing those things as an excuse not to take action. Maintaining the status quo is not enough when risks are increasing, technology is changing and children continue to be exposed to preventable harm. We therefore have the responsibility to adapt our laws to address these challenges. We have the responsibility to ensure that platforms that profit from these young people also help keep them safe. Above all, we have the responsibility to place the well-being of our young people at the heart of our decisions. This bill gives us an opportunity to recognize that just because our children are at home or at school does not necessarily mean that they are safe. We also need to make sure that they are safe in the digital world. By enhancing prevention, demanding greater transparency and accountability from platforms, expediting the removal of some particularly harmful content and establishing independent oversight, we can help create a safer digital environment. We must act with determination but also with discernment by protecting freedom of expression and privacy, which are at the heart of our democracy. Young people deserve to be able to learn, communicate and grow without being left alone to navigate risks that businesses have the means to prevent. That is our responsibility to our families, communities and future generations. I want to thank the people of Mont-Saint-Bruno—L’Acadie for speaking with me and sharing their concerns. They remind why this work is necessary. As young parents, we have a responsibility to keep our children, youth and communities safe. This bill is an important milestone for the community that we represent here in the House. We may not be able to overcome every challenge that the digital world creates, but we can choose to protect the most vulnerable among us more effectively. When it comes to our children’s safety, we have a duty to act.

Statements by Members ·

Alstom

“Alstom won a contract to build 313 new rail cars for VIA Rail. The design work will happen in my riding. This will support 185 local jobs and over 1,000 jobs across Canada. I congratulate Alstom, and I support our government buying from local workers.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, this summer, Alstom was awarded a landmark contract to design, engineer, manufacture and provide support for 313 new rail cars that will serve passengers across the country. That is good news for Mont‑Saint‑Bruno—L’Acadie, where Alstom’s North American headquarters are located. That is where the teams will do the design and engineering work for VIA Rail’s future trains. At the peak of construction, this project will create or support 185 jobs in Saint-Bruno and, in total, more than 1,000 direct, indirect, or related jobs across the country. Our region plays a key role in Canada’s economy. Our teams are talented. They are full of ideas and know how to build the trains of tomorrow. This contract showcases our region’s expertise. I would like to congratulate Alstom on this success. Buying local means supporting our jobs and our know-how. Our government is leading by example. Quebec is playing a key role in this effort. Together with Quebec, we are building a stronger Canada, where we are masters in our own home.

Oral Questions ·

Sports

“Sports keep our communities healthy and bring people together. I want the minister to explain how the government is helping sports grow across the country.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, sport makes our communities stronger and healthier. Sport helps our youth grow and brings families together. Our government wants to give all Canadians good places to go play sports. Can the Secretary of State for Sport explain how our government is working with its partners to develop and improve sport across the country?

Government Orders ·

Canadian Fuel Affordability Act

“Our government is proposing real measures. I want to know what the member proposes to help our businesses stay competitive and to keep prices low for families.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I listened to the fine speech my colleague delivered. As for us, we are putting forward specific measures. I would like to know what measures he is proposing to help our businesses remain competitive and to help keep prices affordable for families and consumers across the country.

Government Orders ·

Business of Supply

“I want my colleague to tell the House again how the government's work has helped Canada since the election.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my colleague gave a great speech. She did an outstanding job of laying out all of our government’s commitments. I would like her to explain to the House again how all of the commitments we have made since our election have steered Canada in the right direction.

Government Orders ·

Building Canada Strong Act

“Canadians want more homes, energy projects, and infrastructure. This bill cuts delays so major projects get built faster, while still following the rules. I want to know if the Bloc Québécois supports building faster, and which parts of this bill they want to speed up.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Canadians want more housing, robust infrastructure, energy projects and trade corridors. Bill C-39 is specifically designed to reduce delays and enable projects of national interest to be completed more quickly, while, of course, maintaining the consultations and safeguards provided for by law. My question is simple. Does the Bloc Québécois actively support the objective of building faster here in Canada? If so, which specific measures would it like to see fast-tracked in Bill C-39?

“I want the member to explain why he opposes this bill. It does not lower standards. It speeds up projects and helps Canada sell to new markets instead of just relying on the United States.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my colleague gave a fine speech about the opinion of his political party. Can he explain to me how he would do a better job defending the benefits of this bill? This bill does not remove standards. Instead, it sets out guidelines to fast-track the implementation of projects so that Canada can be the master in its own house. My colleague argued at length about his opposition to the pipeline, while Canada is diversifying its markets so that it is no longer dependent on a single market, the American market. Why would he not want to support this bill?

Government Orders ·

Building Canada Strong Act

In response to a question from Alexis Deschênes

“I support this bill. It does not lower our standards, but it stops repeated work. Canada needs it to grow on the world stage.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, as I said, Bill C‑39 does not eliminate standards. Instead, it reduces duplication. This bill addresses a need. Canada needs it now to diversify on the global stage.

In response to a question from Jacques Gourde

“Canadians voted for our government and gave us a majority. I believe they still support us.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Canadians elected a new government, and they have a majority government. I think we are in good stead with Canadians.

In response to a question from Arielle Kayabaga

“I support this bill. It cuts red tape and speeds up approvals for major building projects, like the new port on Montreal's south shore, which will create jobs.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Bill C-39 will truly modernize, strengthen and speed up processes. Earlier, I spoke about standardizing e-document transfers, which would reduce red tape. There is the Contrecoeur port project on Montreal’s south shore. This is a major project that will bring significant innovation and generate many new jobs in the region. Thanks to Bill C-39, projects like this will move forward more quickly, as we bring our regulations into line with international standards.

In response to a question from Alexis Deschênes

“This bill does not lower our standards. It cuts down on repeat work and makes the rules more predictable so Canada is stronger.”
  • A repeated line

    “It is about making federal processes more consistent and predictable.”

    Said 3 times by 2 members since October 5.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I would like to offer this response to my colleague. As I said in my speech, this is not about eliminating standards, but about reducing duplication. It is also about making processes more consistent and predictable. Our approach is to make Canada stronger and better equipped.

In response to a question from Jacques Gourde

“I want to ask the member why he will not vote for this bill to move Canada forward.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 49 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I would ask him why he would not vote for this bill now to move Canada forward.