MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Sukhman Gill

Follow by RSS

Gill presses for the full federal fuel excise tax on diesel to be scrapped until Canada Day 2027, for repealing the Liberals’ bail laws, and for faster approvals of local projects like farm processing facilities. He opens and pads his speeches with courtesies, thanking colleagues before making his point: “I want to thank my hon. colleague for her fantastic work.” He leans on stories from his riding, such as truckers convoying to Vancouver over diesel prices.Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
A–
86 / 100 over 21 statements
Signal 79 / 100
Relevance 70 / 100
Respect 100 / 100
Clarity 93 / 100
Averaged over the 21 of 23 statements graded so far.

In their own words

Loses points more than most for

Loses points less than most for A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.Less often than most members.What the tags mean

Statements 23

Statements by Members ·

British Columbia Election

“British Columbia just elected a Conservative majority government for the first time in nearly 100 years. Voters chose change to lower costs, cut red tape, and put families first. I congratulate Premier-elect Lorne Doerkson and everyone who voted for this change.”
  • Member's statement

    Signal 32 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we have good news. This past Saturday, the people of British Columbia delivered a strong and historic message. For the first time in nearly 100 years, British Columbians elected a Conservative majority government. The B.C. Conservatives secured a powerful mandate of over 60 seats, bringing an end to the nine years of the costly NDP government. From the Lower Mainland to the interior, from the Fraser Valley to communities large and small, British Columbians chose change. They chose a government committed to lowering costs, cutting red tape and putting hard-working families first. I want to congratulate Premier-elect Lorne Doerkson, every Conservative candidate and every voter who refused to accept the status quo. This was more than just an election victory. It was a powerful reminder that common-sense Conservative principles resonate with Canadians. The blue wave is strong, our movement is growing and this is just the beginning.

Government Orders ·

Canadian Fuel Affordability Act

“High diesel prices make it hard for families in my area to afford fuel and get by. I want my colleague to tell us how these high prices are hurting people in his riding.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I have a very reasonable question for the member. Many members from Abbotsford had to convoy all the way to Vancouver during this last couple of weeks. They had to make sure they raised awareness of the government in power about high diesel prices. Diesel prices have become very extraordinary for our community in the Lower Mainland as people go day to day filling up their tanks and making sure they can try to provide for their families. They sometimes fail on making the mark. I know this goes for people across the Lower Mainland and across our nation. I know this affects people in my Conservative colleague’s area as well, so I would like to understand what the effects are in my colleague’s area.

“Young people are struggling with high fuel taxes, including those working blue-collar jobs. The government has offered only minimal help. I want my colleague to tell us what our party will do to bring full relief.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Relevance 15 of 100

    None of this question addressed the preceding speech or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I thank my hon. colleague, as he is doing fantastic work within his riding of Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, across the region and across the country. He is advocating for youth and youth employment. Many of my peers and I can relate to many of the same consequences that Liberal governments have put forward. Recently, many of my peers reached out to me during the Abbotsford-to-Vancouver convoy in the Lower Mainland of Vancouver, which was a rally against high diesel prices and against the fuel excise tax in general. Youth are struggling in general. Youth are struggling across the nation, and they want results, especially because they are even struggling to work in blue-collar jobs. I would like to know what the hon. member will be bringing to the table from our Conservative Party. I would also like to know what he has to say in opposition to the members across the aisle, who have brought minimal relief instead of full relief for Canadians.

“I am a farmer, so I know high fuel prices hurt farmers trying to produce and deliver food. Cutting fuel taxes will help all Canadians. I want the member to see this and support the motion.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is not that I am recognizing diesel prices just today. I am a farmer myself. I come from a farming background. I understand how much it is costing me and other farmers across our nation currently to fuel our farms and make sure we can deliver food across this nation. It is not just for the measures that my hon. colleague is mentioning today but for all Canadians. I wish and desire that he would see what I am talking about and that the motion we are speaking to today would be spoken about as well.

In response to a question from Carol Anstey

“People in British Columbia have the same fuel problems as people across the country. Truckers cannot afford their gas, monthly payments, or savings for their families. I want the other parties to join us in talking about this.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 38 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I want to thank my hon. colleague for her fantastic work and her advocacy across her area and across the nation as well. Before I answer the question, I want to let the member know that, yes, we in B.C. have the same problems they have in Ontario and across the nation. Many of our truckers are dealing with the same crisis. They are going about their day-to-day life not able to afford the simple things they should be able to afford. Their second and third fill-ups are so exhausting that they go home and are not able to have their dollar carry through the month to afford the payments they need to make, to carry some relief and to make sure they have some savings for their family and kids. This is the same issue I know the member is dealing with, and across the nation, many of the members on this side of the House are dealing with this as well. I am eager to see what the members on the opposing side have to say about this, because I know their constituents are feeling the same pain. I thank the member for her advocacy and her work. I wish the members opposing could join us as well.

In response to a question from Guillaume Deschênes-Thériault

“This debate is simply about making gas cheaper for Canadians. Two weeks ago, the member voted against pausing fuel taxes until July 2027 and ending diesel taxes. Conservatives voted for those cuts, but the government side did not.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 43 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Reply to a debate question

    Signal 42 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the answer, the debate, is simple. It is about bringing relief to Canadians at the gas pumps. That is what we are here debating. That is what my hon. colleague had an option of voting for two weeks ago when he decided to vote against the full relief up to Canada Day 2027 and to make sure we could eliminate full diesel taxes for all Canadians and further bring relief for Canadians. This is what we were talking about today. These are the measures our side voted for and strongly believes in. We do not see the same representation on the other side of the House. We do not want to make this about party politics, but that is unfortunately what we have here today.

“I support this bill because any tax cut on fuel helps. But it does not go far enough. It only lowers the fuel tax for a few months and then brings it back. The government should adopt the Conservative plan instead. That plan would remove all federal taxes on gas and diesel until at least Canada Day 2027. High fuel prices hurt farmers, truckers, and families who are struggling to buy food.”
  • A repeated line

    “A recent poll found that 63% of Canadians oppose the Liberals bringing back the fuel excise tax.”

    Said 3 times by 3 members since September 22.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is always a true honour to stand up in the House and speak on behalf of the members of Abbotsford—South Langley, who I represent dearly. I want to start by saying that I am splitting my time with the member for Long Range Mountains, who will be speaking after me. Today, I want to talk about something that is concerning for people not only in my riding of Abbotsford—South Langley but across the country: prices at the fuel pumps. As a Conservative team, we have gotten countless emails from across the nation asking for relief at the pumps. From the countless emails that I have gotten, I have seen that many residents in Abbotsford—South Langley are frustrated when filling their tanks. Earlier this year, after constant pressure from my colleagues and I, the Liberals announced half measures up to April 20, removing the excise tax on fuel. If it had been up to them, this September we would have resumed taxes to their full extent, but once again, my Conservative colleagues and I stood up in the House and pushed for relief for all Canadians. We delivered. Earlier this month, the Conservatives announced an emergency fuel relief plan aimed at removing all federal taxes on diesel until at least Canada Day 2027. Unlike the members across the aisle, my colleagues and I believe that Canadians deserve the full relief rather than a third of the relief for a third of the year. Now Bill C-38 has been introduced, and it would extend the fuel excise tax relief until January 31, 2027. The rates would then resume to 50% of the normal amount until March 31, 2027, and the full tax would resume from April 1, 2027, onwards. This bill would provide relief of up to 10¢ per litre on gasoline and four cents on diesel. Then the relief would shrink to half from February onwards, and Canadians would get no relief starting in April 2027. Let us compare that to what we were offering early this month: full tax relief on diesel, which would have provided up to 25¢ per litre in relief until July of next year. It is clear that our plan would have brought more relief to Canadians across the nation, yet the Liberals voted against our motion. The impact of high gas prices goes well beyond families filling up at local gas stations. I think about our farmers, truckers, contractors and small business owners. Fuel is not an option for these Canadians. It is the cost of doing business. A trucker cannot deliver goods without diesel. Our farmers cannot operate equipment without diesel. Contractors cannot carry lumber and tools to a job site on public transit. For millions of Canadians, driving is not a luxury. It is a necessity for how they earn a living and go about their day to day. Just recently, B.C. truck drivers protested against rising diesel prices in the Lower Mainland. The cost of high fuel prices is affecting their day-to-day lives. Many of them are essentially working for free to pay for the fuel that they put in their tanks. Simply extending the excise tax relief is not enough for those whose livelihoods depend on the cost of gas and diesel. The foundation of our society as a whole is built on those who go about their day-to-day jobs depending on gas and diesel. We have to make sure they are able to trust that the government has their backs when things become difficult for them, especially in times like right now, when they are feeling the most pressure at the tanks from province to province across the nation. The reality is that the majority of Canadians believe that the Liberals are providing half measures of relief when they could provide full measures of relief if they were to adopt our Conservative plan. That is the truth. A recent poll found that 63% of Canadians oppose the Prime Minister bringing back the fuel excise tax, including 43% who strongly oppose it. Those numbers also include 72% of seniors, 68% of women and 61% of those who are between the ages of 35 and 54. They are all opposed to a reintroduction of diesel and fuel taxes. Opposition crosses every region across the country: 71% in Manitoba and Saskatchewan; 64% in British Columbia, Alberta and Atlantic Canada; 62% in Ontario; and 60% in Quebec. Instead of listening to Canadians and their concerns, members across the aisle want them to celebrate the half-relief they would be given for only a couple of months. It is ridiculous. I want to emphasize that any relief given for any citizen is 100% good news, and we will 100% agree with any relief the opposing government gives. However, the thing is that it had an opportunity to make sure it could support measures for 100% relief, but the government opposed this. Especially when more relief could be provided, the cost of fuel directly impacts affordability across our country. High diesel costs lead to farmers’ having to pay more for growing the food, and to truckers’ having to pay more to haul that very food across the country. Then it inflates costs, which make it down to the everyday Canadian buying products at the grocery stores. I ask members across the floor a simple question: Are they able to look a single parent in the eye during this struggle and say they brought relief to them to help put meals on the dinner table? I bet that is a hard question for many members to answer, but I ask it on behalf of all Canadians. My colleagues and I acknowledge that there is an energy crisis happening and that it is out of our control. We fully agree with that. However, while these naturally increasing prices on fuel happen, we can take many measures to help Canadians at the pumps. The first step was to adopt the plan that my Conservative colleagues and I put forward two weeks ago. That is why we continue to call on the government to remove all federal taxes on gas and diesel until at least Canada Day 2027 to save Canadians 25¢ per litre at the pump, which would bring $1,000 of relief, savings, for the average Canadian and the average family. That includes seven cents per litre of clean fuel regulations, the GST and the permanent cancellation of the industrial carbon tax so Canadians are not forced to pay more for food and fuel. While the conversation is around government relief measures, I want to also highlight the developing projects around B.C. The B.C. NDP government signed an MOU with the federal government this summer, which was a clear path for the new southern route pipeline, another route alongside the existing energy corridor through the Sumas Prairie region that brought much relief to our community and our country. However, at the same time, we need to make sure that certain vulnerabilities are protected, such as with respect to the flooding that has happened year after year. Farmers have advocated about this countless times. In 2021, when we had the immense floods in the Sumas Prairie and Abbotsford communities, we wanted to make sure we could protect certain lands and bring adequate infrastructure development forward before we had certain pipelines instituted in that area. I bring this up so all Canadians know that while we provide relief and measures for the country, we have to make sure we understand what is important. First of all, that is infrastructure relief and making sure infrastructure is coordinated with the federal government to bring in new projects that benefit all Canadians across the nation but at the same time do not damage the integrity of the Lower Mainland communities. With the measures the government is bringing forward, we need to make sure we have tax relief not just for Canadians at the pumps but across the nation. These are farmers, people with jobs, members and Canadians asking for relief again and again. They want relief at the pumps. They want results from the government. Again and again, we see the failure of representation of what Canadians actually want. I hope the government takes into account what I have said today, and I hope to get some answers.

“I want to ask the member what more the government should have done to lower fuel costs. Truck drivers across the country are protesting because diesel prices are too high.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I want to start by thanking the hon. member for Oshawa for her great protest against the Liberal government. I know she is doing a fantastic job on the public safety committee as well, making sure she fights for the safety of Canadians. As she sees the votes being cast on both sides of the House, what more could the Liberal government have done to make sure to bring more relief to Canadians at this point, especially when we see convoys happening across the country with truck drivers requesting relief at the pumps, especially for diesel prices?

“I agree with my colleague. Truck drivers in our area are struggling with high diesel prices. I want him to explain how a Conservative government would give Canadians immediate relief from fuel costs.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, my hon. colleague from Langley Township—Fraser Heights delivered an incredible speech and touched on the main points that Canadians are facing today. I know that the hon. member has also dealt with the truck driver members in our community, who did a convoy from Abbotsford all the way down to Vancouver. They went through the member’s riding. They were struggling to deal with high diesel prices, as the motion dealt with. I would like to ask my hon. colleague how we would give immediate relief to Canadians and what we would have done differently as a Conservative government if we were given the opportunity.

Oral Questions ·

Taxation

“High diesel prices make food, building, and goods cost more for Canadians. I want the Prime Minister to vote for our plan to cut all taxes on diesel until Canada Day.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, last week, hundreds of dump truck drivers hit the roads protesting the rising diesel prices. Diesel powers the trucks that move our goods, the equipment that builds our communities and the farms that put food on our tables. When diesel costs rise, Canadians pay more for everything. Today the Liberals have the opportunity to vote on a Conservative emergency fuel relief plan to cut all taxes on diesel until Canada Day and bring some relief during Thanksgiving. Will the Prime Minister listen to our truckers and finally give relief to Canadians?

Government Orders ·

Business of Supply

In response to a question from Kevin Lamoureux

“Diesel prices are so high that truck drivers in my riding held a protest convoy to get the government's attention. People cannot afford fuel to do their jobs. I want the member to explain our Conservative plans to lower diesel prices.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I know residents in the member’s riding greatly appreciate the great work that he is doing. I just want to highlight something that happened in my neck of the woods in Abbotsford—South Langley. Diesel prices are so high that truck drivers had a convoy from Abbotsford to Vancouver in the Lower Mainland to make sure they could alert the government about the high prices. Canadians are struggling to fill their tanks. They are struggling to go about their day-to-day jobs. I would just like to hear from the hon. member about the Conservative platform. What are our Conservative ideas that we could implement against high diesel prices?

Government Orders ·

Building Canada Strong Act

In response to a question from Carol Anstey

“Businesses and entrepreneurs are leaving Canada for the United States. We need to build more infrastructure and bring more projects here instead.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 47 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, that is the reality we see with the government. We do not see the private sector booming, and we do not see private businesses and private entrepreneurs getting involved in Canada. We see our businesses and entrepreneurs going south of the border. We want to make sure that we bring more infrastructure and more projects to Canada.

In response to a question from Steeve Lavoie

“The government claims it created more jobs, but they are only government jobs. These do not help regular Canadians or private businesses. For ten years, this government has only made projects harder to build and caused delays.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the government also claims that it has brought more jobs forward, but the fact of the matter is that they are only government jobs. We do not see this benefiting everyday Canadians. We do not see this benefiting the private sector. We see more complications, and projects being held up and delayed. That is the reality. That is what we have seen after 10 years of the Liberal government. That is what Canadians are dealing with right now.

In response to a question from Dan Albas

“I agree with my colleague. Government delays turn one-year projects into five or ten-year projects. The government is not making the approval process faster or simpler.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my hon. colleague is completely right. We see again and again that delays are being pushed back. It can be years and years. A one-year project can turn into a five-year project, or a 10-year project, for that matter. This is the problem we see. We do not see the necessities we need to bring forward so that projects can be completed in a streamlined process. That is what we are missing from the government.

In response to a question from Carlos Leitão

“The government has been in power for 10 years and has not gotten things done. They promise to help everyday Canadians, but they do not finish projects. They also fail to work well with the provinces to approve projects quickly.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, this is simple. The current government has been in power for 10 years. Canadians have been suffering for 10 years. If it were time to get stuff done, it would have been done already. That is what the mis-allusion is. The government keeps alluding to the fact that it is going to be helping everyday Canadians, but it is only cutting them short and shortchanging them. We do not see any projects being pushed to completion. The Liberals are not working with our provinces the way they should be, and streamlining projects the way they should be: efficiently and effectively.

“I do not support this bill. The government claims it creates a fast one-year approval process for building projects, but that is not true. Companies will still wait years doing studies before that clock even starts. The bill also gives too much power to cabinet instead of cutting red tape. I want the government to get rid of its old assessment laws and actually make it faster and easier to build things in Canada.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is always an honour to rise in the House to represent the good people of Abbotsford—South Langley. Before I begin to speak on this topic, I want to take the time to acknowledge the B.C. truck drivers’ protest on rising diesel prices. The cost of these high prices is affecting their day-to-day lives, and for many, it is basically taking away their power to work. My colleagues and I are calling on the government to scrap the full federal fuel excise tax until Canada Day to bring down fuel costs. I want to take the time to go back to the 44th Parliament, when the Liberals marched into the House and introduced Bill C-69, which was intended to make projects more efficient and timely, but in hindsight, we know that has not been the case. We have not seen a record number of development projects, but we have seen a record number of approvals in waiting. Instead of repealing the antidevelopment law, the government decided to introduce Bill C-5 to solve timeline issues. Bill C-5 was supposed to bring quick and effective legislative change and to build at speeds not seen in generations. It has now been 18 months, and we have no new permits that have been passed, no new projects that have been built and no new jobs, other than government jobs, that have been created. Now the government has introduced a 246-page omnibus bill that, in its own explanation, was introduced to tackle the lengthy approval times that create investor uncertainty. The explanation around the necessity seems quite familiar, because it is the same argument that the government used for Bill C-69 and Bill C-5. The Liberals create the problems, then pass bills trying to fix the problems that they created, which leads to more delays and more bureaucracy, and the cycle continues. That is why I ask today, on behalf of all Canadians, why they should expect anything different this time around. We do not need speeches and summits. We need to build this economy, and there is rhetoric more than facts right now. The reality shows something completely different. We have the slowest-growing economy and the highest food inflation in the entirety of the G7. The members across the aisle have been championing this bill, which would cut bureaucracy and fast-track investment projects. The details of the bill show a different reality. I imagine a group of local dairy farmers or blueberry farmers in my neck of the woods, Abbotsford—South Langley, who want to build a state-of-the-art agricultural processing facility. Right now, they would have to pitch this idea to municipal, provincial and federal agencies, all working separately and not coordinating on timelines. It would take the farmers three to five years just to get the permits they need to build. In Bill C-39, the government promises these farmers a one-year federal review of their projects. While this sounds straightforward, it is far from that. The one-year clock would not start when the farmers bring projects forward. It could take up to six months for planning and then another year to provide studies and information the government requires. The bill even states that the timeline could be extended. Once the minister was satisfied with all the preliminary studies, the actual one-year clock would begin for the farmers, and then the process for the facility would start. As such, it is not that straightforward. The reality is that the tag line of “one-year approval” is misleading. Potential investors want thorough and straightforward legislation. Instead, misleading tag lines would only lead to more confusion and drag investors away. I imagine the government missing its own deadline. Common sense would say that the project would be moving forward regardless, but in true Liberal fashion, a missed deadline would lead to more bureaucracy. The minister would have to provide an explanation for the delay and propose another timeline. If the goal is to increase investor certainty and to attract big projects, how is this accomplishing any of those goals, unless the real goal here is to make these big announcements and more empty speeches? I ask the members across how long it would take an independent agribusiness from my community to even start the process of the application. Would they have to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to navigate through government overlap and to even get to the stage to get permission to apply? Would Bill C-39 simplify those front-end hurdles, or would it hide the bureaucratic delays inside the misleading narrative of a one-year approval? Worst of all, instead of building a rules-based predictable system that is easy to navigate for every business in Canada, part 1 of Bill C-39 would concentrate permanent power directly within the Prime Minister’s cabinet. Businesses in Abbotsford—South Langley do not want to hire a high-priced Ottawa lobbyist just to get their projects noticed by cabinet. My constituents, the community members of Abbotsford—South Langley, and businesses across Canada do not need another Ottawa top-down approach. They need a streamlined system that works for every single project and cuts unnecessary red tape. This bill proposes making changes to the Canada Energy Regulator as well. Bill C-39 would make the CER the sole assessor for pipelines, designated power lines and offshore renewable energy projects. For new pipelines that are less than 300 kilometres of new right-of-way, the CER would make its final decision itself. Where did this 300-kilometre number even come from? What is the fundamental difference between a pipeline that is 295 kilometres of new right-of-way, which is approved by the CER, and a pipeline at 305 kilometres, which would still require cabinet approval? Are these thresholds based on environmental risk or project complexity, or is it simply another decision made by the government for where it would draw the line? The bill proposes to create regions of natural interest for fast-tracking projects. Cabinet could designate an entire region and identify categories of projects that may qualify within it. Something like this could matter greatly in areas full of natural resources and critical minerals where there are currently bureaucracy clogs delaying projects. One of the areas that has potential to be on the national interest region list is the Abbotsford and Sumas Prairie region. This is a critical energy- and agriculture-rich area, and the B.C. NDP government and the federal government signed an MOU this summer, which clearly created a path for the new southern route pipeline. If they were able to bring in this route alongside the existing energy corridor through the Sumas Prairie region, there would also need to be a government project to develop infrastructure for flood protection mitigation as well. The Sumas Prairie region is extremely vulnerable to flooding, and for years farmers in that region have been advocating for adequate infrastructure development to protect their lands in that area. The reason I bring this up is to draw attention to the fact that while we fast-track national interest projects, it is important we keep the development of local infrastructure up to par so families in the area and in the region are not burdened. Implementation would determine whether the creation of natural interest regions would truly make a difference. Given the Liberals’ track record, it does not seem that this would be likely. Our position on this side of the House is simple. Any legislation must save Canadians money and cut red tape to unleash production. This is exactly why we have consistently called to repeal the antidevelopment law, Bill C-69, and truly release energy in our country. The government has promised Canadians infrastructure development at speeds we have not seen in generations. So far, we have no projects or development to show for it. Bill C-39 should be judged on one simple standard. Can Canadian companies develop a project and get answers when they want to get to work in any reasonable amount of time? If the goal of this bill is to increase investor security, then the answer to this question is required. We cannot afford to get things wrong. Our country, our future and the prosperity of our nation must come first.

Oral Questions ·

Public Safety

“A repeat offender broke into a building in my riding, was let out the same day, and committed more crimes. I want the government to change its laws so criminals are not released so easily.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, just this past weekend, Amanda, from Abbotsford, experienced what she describes as a reoccurring incident. A homeless man broke into her building and stole nearly a thousand dollars’ worth of her personal belongings. After reporting the incident to authorities, she was told that the offender would likely be back out later that day. Amanda says that they have subsequently seen the same individual return and commit further offences. When will the Liberals stand up for law-abiding Canadians and repeal their reckless, soft-on-crime policies?

Statements by Members ·

Public Safety

“A man in my riding was shot while trying to stop a break-in. The person accused of shooting him is a repeat violent offender. The Conservatives want to end Liberal bail and house arrest rules so dangerous criminals stay in jail.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, a man who saw his neighbour in danger did what any good neighbour would do. He jumped in to help. In responding to the break and enter, he was shot in both legs. A few weeks ago, a community member brought this heartbreaking case to my office. According to the information shared with us, the accused is a repeat offender facing 32 alleged charges, many involving weapons and violence spanning over two decades. Now the victim and the family are the ones left to pay the price. The victim faces a long and painful recovery while still trying to provide for his family and four foster children. Families in our communities deserve to feel safe in their own homes. They deserve to know that repeat violent defenders will face serious consequences. That is why my Conservative colleagues and I are fighting to end Liberal bail, house arrest and catch-and-release policies and to keep Canadians safe, because no innocent family should ever have to pay for anyone committing those crimes.

Oral Questions ·

The Economy

“The Liberals caused our economic problems, and our growth is falling behind the United States. They are also borrowing billions more than they planned. Will the Prime Minister admit that Canada is in a recession?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the fact is that the Liberals caused these economic headwinds. The fact is that the Liberal Prime Minister is the only prime minister who is running this country, which is in a recession. Canadian banks are now warning of economic decline, with Scotiabank forecasting just 0.8% growth for Canada compared to 1.9% in the United States, while BMO projects even weaker growth, 0.5%, in 2026. It is not only that, but the Liberals are already borrowing billions of dollars over their projected costly budget. Will the Prime Minister finally admit that Canada is technically in a real recession?

“Canada's economy is shrinking, and it is the only G20 country in a recession. I want the Prime Minister to tell us if we are in a recession.”
  • A repeated line

    “Canada is the only G20 country in a recession.”

    Said 104 times by 61 members since May 29.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, under the Liberal Prime Minister, Canada is the only G20 country in a recession. The economy has shrunk in two consecutive quarters. Per capita GDP is only up 1.5% over seven years, and labour productivity has declined for four years straight. Even the Parliamentary Budget Officer said there is a less than 1% chance that the government will meet its fiscal anchor. Will the Prime Minister tell us if we are in a recession, or are Canadians only technically doing worse after a decade of Liberal rule?