The Economy

During question period on the economy, Conservatives said that eleven years of Liberal management have brought higher taxes, more debt, and heavy regulation — over 320,000 regulatory requirements on businesses by one economist’s count — and cited factory closures and the example of a Quebec greenhouse company paying $2.5 million a year in carbon tax and eco-fees, arguing the government should cut taxes and rules rather than offer temporary fixes. Liberal members replied that the government is already streamlining structures and reducing regulations, is helping people with support for groceries, seniors, and children, and that business difficulties stem mainly from American tariffs, against which the government is providing financial help.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

4 statements

Eric Lefebvre, Richmond—Arthabaska

Conservative
“Liberal regulations and taxes are hurting Canadian businesses. They cause layoffs and closures, and regular Canadians pay the price. I want the Prime Minister to realize this.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, 11 years of Liberal management have resulted in higher taxes, more debt, more credit card spending and more regulations. The National Bank’s chief economist reminded us that the Liberals are now imposing over 320,000 regulatory requirements on Canadian businesses, while the United States is deregulating. The consequences of this are layoffs or, worse, closures. When will the Prime Minister understand that more regulations force additional costs on businesses and that Canadians are the ones paying the price?

Nathalie Provost, Secretary of State (Nature)

Liberal
“We are cutting red tape, making government simpler, and working better with Quebec. We are also helping people through hard times with money for food, seniors, and kids. I want the other parties to help us.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Clarity 46 of 100

    Much of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we are already working to streamline the government’s structure, simplify relations between Quebec and Ottawa and reduce the number of regulations. We are moving forward and we will get it done. In addition, we are working on issues that affect Canadians. The Canada groceries and essentials benefit, the various programs we have for seniors and children—all of these are designed to support Canadians in these difficult times. That is what we are doing and we hope our colleagues will join us in this effort.

Eric Lefebvre, Richmond—Arthabaska

Conservative
“Factories are closing and taxes hurt local businesses. Savoura pays 2.5 million dollars a year in carbon taxes and green fees, making it hard to compete with Mexican tomatoes. The government should cut rules and taxes instead of making new temporary fixes.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, what a sad state of affairs. Since January, factory closures have been on the rise. On top of losing their jobs, Canadians are footing the Liberal Party’s credit card bill. Savoura pays $2.5 million a year in carbon tax and in Éco Entreprises Québec penalties. These surcharges make it difficult to compete with tomatoes from Mexico, which travel across the entire continent. Instead of creating a new band-aid for businesses, why not streamline the regulations and give our business owners some real breathing room?

Carlos Leitão, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Industry

Liberal

Linked statement

“Canadian businesses are struggling because of American tariffs. We are spending money to help them survive.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, businesses in Quebec and across Canada are facing difficulties. Where do these difficulties stem from? They stem from the tariff war. They stem from the excessive, unjustified and ultimately counterproductive tariffs that the Americans are imposing on Canadian businesses. That is the problem. That is why we must help businesses. That is why we are supporting businesses and spending what needs to be spent to keep our businesses alive.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 116

  1. Government Orders Military Justice System Modernization Act 35 statements
  2. Private Members' Business Criminal Code 13 statements
  3. Government Orders Government Orders 8 statements
  4. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  5. Oral Questions Natural Resources 4 statements
  6. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 6 statements
  8. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions Natural Resources 4 statements
  10. Oral Questions Taxation 4 statements
  11. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Public Services and Procurement 4 statements
  13. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  14. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  15. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Veterans 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions Natural Resources 7 statements
  18. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 10 statements
  19. Oral Questions Emergency Management 2 statements
  20. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 6 statements
  21. Oral Questions Northern Affairs 2 statements
  22. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 3 statements
  23. Oral Questions The Economy 5 statements
  24. Government Orders Report Stage 86 statements
  25. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  26. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  27. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements