Indigenous Affairs

During question period on Indigenous Affairs, the Conservative leader asked about a British Columbia court decision concerning the Cowichan land claim, saying a federal litigation guideline prevented government lawyers from arguing that private property rights extinguish Aboriginal title, leaving homeowners worried about their property, and asking the Prime Minister to change the guideline. The Prime Minister responded that the government defends private property rights, pointed to the government’s September 8 appeal of the decision, and said it would use all available legal options, including measures in Richmond, BC. In a second exchange, the Conservative leader repeated that the guideline remained on the government website and asked the Prime Minister to let his lawyers make the extinguishment argument in court. The Prime Minister responded that the Opposition Leader was trying to stoke fear and division, repeated that the government had appealed, and said the government respects both property rights and Indigenous rights.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

4 statements

Pierre Poilievre, Leader of the Opposition

Conservative
“The government told its lawyers not to defend homeowners' property rights in a British Columbia court case, and the judge ruled that Indigenous land claims come first. Now homeowners worry they will lose their homes. I want the Prime Minister to change this rule, let federal lawyers speak, and defend people's property rights.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, litigation guideline 14 was the Liberal government instructing federal lawyers not to defend property rights and argue that they extinguished other claims in the federal Cowichan decision. The judge came forward and said, “Okay,” and agreed that aboriginal title, then, came before homeowners’ property rights in British Columbia. Now seniors and families toss and turn at night, wondering if they even own their homes. Will the Prime Minister reverse course, stop muzzling federal lawyers, revoke guideline 14 and defend property rights in B.C.?

Mark Carney, Prime Minister

Liberal
“We will always protect private property rights. That is why we appealed the court decision about Cowichan. We will use every legal option to protect people's property.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Clarity 36 of 100

    Much of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.

    See full analysis
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this answer, 100% addressed the question that was asked.

    See full analysis
  • A repeated line

    “We disagree with the B.C. Supreme Court's ruling.”

    Said 5 times by 3 members since April 24.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, as I rose in this House a few weeks ago and made clear, this government will always defend private property rights. That is why this government immediately appealed the decision with respect to Cowichan, on September 8. We fundamentally disagree with the B.C. Supreme Court’s decision. We will use all viable legal options to address and protect private property rights, always, in this country.

Pierre Poilievre, Leader of the Opposition

Conservative
“The Prime Minister is stopping government lawyers from arguing that private property rights cancel out other land claims. This makes people in British Columbia worry they do not own their homes. I want the Prime Minister to admit he was wrong, let his lawyers make this argument, and protect private property rights in court.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister is banning his lawyers from making those viable legal arguments, because guideline 14 is still on the federal government’s website. He is the client and is instructing the lawyer not to make the valid legal argument that fee simple private property rights extinguish all other claims. If he makes the same arguments, he will get the same results. Millions of British Columbia homeowners wonder if they even own their home. They are tossing and turning every single night. Will the Prime Minister admit the Liberal government made a mistake, unmuzzle the lawyers, get rid of guideline 14 and put property rights first in court?

Mark Carney, Prime Minister

Liberal

Linked statement

“The Leader of the Opposition is trying to scare and divide Canadians. We are taking legal action to protect private property rights in Richmond, British Columbia. We respect both property rights and Indigenous rights.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 29 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is sad. The person who is tossing and turning every night is the Leader of the Opposition, trying to come up with new ways to stoke fear and division in this country. We will always defend private property rights in this country. That is why we immediately appealed. That is why we are acceding with the Montrose claim. That is why we are supporting the City of Richmond and the Province of B.C. in this important case. We will take all viable legal options. We respect property rights and indigenous rights to reconciliation.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 122

  1. Government Orders Business of Supply 64 statements
  2. Government Orders Business of Supply 45 statements
  3. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions Taxation 4 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  6. Oral Questions Justice 6 statements
  7. Oral Questions The Economy 16 statements
  8. Oral Questions The Environment 4 statements
  9. Oral Questions Finance 6 statements
  10. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 10 statements
  11. Oral Questions Public Safety 8 statements
  12. Oral Questions Women and Gender Equality 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 6 statements
  14. Oral Questions Natural Resources 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Fisheries and Oceans 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions The Environment 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Business of the House 2 statements
  19. Government Orders Government Orders 2 statements
  20. Oral Questions Taxation 4 statements
  21. Oral Questions Emergency Management 3 statements
  22. Government Orders Business of Supply 15 statements
  23. Government Orders Business of Supply 15 statements
  24. Government Orders Business of Supply 27 statements
  25. Private Members' Business An Act to repeal certain restrictions on shipping 12 statements
  26. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  27. Government Orders Business of Supply 366 statements
  28. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements