The Environment

During Question Period on the environment, members debated Bill C-39, legislation that would speed up approvals for major projects, including pipelines, by shortening timelines for assessments and consultations. Marilène Gill of the Bloc Québécois said the bill lets pipelines bypass environmental reviews, suspends environmental laws in areas designated of national interest, and limits Indigenous consultations to one year; she also raised a lawsuit by fifteen young people alleging the government has failed to cut greenhouse gas emissions, and urged the government to change course rather than fight them. Liberal ministers Dominic LeBlanc and Steven MacKinnon replied that the bill is meant to get good projects built faster in a rigorous and responsible way, that speed does not mean lowering environmental standards or ignoring duties to First Nations, and that projects like Churchill Falls would create thousands of jobs as large renewable energy undertakings.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

4 statements

Marilène Gill, Côte-Nord—Kawawachikamach—Nitassinan

Bloc Québécois
“I oppose this bill. It lets pipeline projects skip environmental reviews, suspends environmental laws on certain land, and rushes consultations with First Nations to one year. This will cause major public backlash.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Bill C-39 is a major departure. It allows pipeline projects to bypass environmental impact assessments. It would allow swaths of our territory to be designated as being of national interest, thereby suspending the application of environmental laws. It also limits consultations to one year. This means that Ottawa could build the Marinvest pipeline in Quebec without an environmental impact assessment, by suspending environmental laws and rushing through consultations with first nations. Do the Liberals realize that they are gearing up for a social acceptability crisis?

Dominic LeBlanc, President of the King’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister responsible for Canada-U.S. Trade, Intergovernmental Affairs, Internal Trade, and One Canadian Economy

Liberal

Linked statement

“The member from the Bloc Québécois is not describing our decisions accurately. This bill is meant to help good projects get built faster, in a careful and responsible way. Moving faster does not mean we will lower environmental standards or ignore our duties to First Nations. We will do things the right way.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Signal 33 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this answer, 100% addressed the question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I understand that our colleague from the Bloc Québécois wishes to characterize a series of decisions in a way that is not entirely accurate, but as we have said many times in the House, the bill before Parliament is specifically intended to expedite, in a responsible and rigorous manner, projects that are in the country’s economic and social interest. Just because we are moving faster does not mean we are not meeting our environmental standards or fulfilling our obligations to first nations. On the contrary, we are going to do things the right way.

Marilène Gill, Côte-Nord—Kawawachikamach—Nitassinan

Bloc Québécois
“Fifteen young people are suing the federal government for hurting their future by not cutting greenhouse gases. Instead of listening, the government wants to pass this bill to build pipelines by going around environmental rules. This locks us into fossil fuels for at least 50 years. The government should change course instead of fighting these young people.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, 15 young people aged 26 or younger are suing the federal government. They accuse the government of jeopardizing their future by failing to take action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The Prime Minister has answered them by tabling Bill C‑39, which seeks to build pipelines by circumventing environmental standards. His response is to lock them into fossil fuels for at least 50 years. Young people are right to say that the Liberals are jeopardizing their future. Instead of fighting these young people, why do they not correct course?

Steven MacKinnon, Minister of Transport and Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Liberal
“Young people want our country to grow. The Churchill Falls project will create thousands of jobs. It will show that we can build big clean energy projects faster without lowering our standards.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 37 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Quebec youth, like young people across Canada, dream of a future where the country continues to grow, develop and evolve. The Churchill Falls project alone is going to create thousands of jobs, and as the largest renewable energy project in North American history, it is going to prove that projects can get done faster without lowering our standards or expectations as Canadians.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 155

  1. Private Members' Business An Act to Repeal Certain Restrictions on Shipping 7 statements
  2. Government Orders Strengthening Canada's Defence Sector Act 52 statements
  3. Statements by Members Tribute to Men of Terrebonne 2 statements
  4. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  5. Oral Questions The Environment 4 statements
  6. Oral Questions Labour 2 statements
  7. Oral Questions Finance 8 statements
  8. Oral Questions The Economy 7 statements
  9. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 4 statements
  10. Oral Questions The Economy 10 statements
  11. Oral Questions Child Care 2 statements
  12. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Natural Resources 6 statements
  14. Oral Questions Agriculture and Agri-Food 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Justice 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 2 statements
  18. Government Orders Strengthening Canada's Defence Sector Act 67 statements
  19. Oral Questions Finance 2 statements
  20. Oral Questions Steel and Aluminum Industry 8 statements
  21. Oral Questions International Trade 5 statements
  22. Oral Questions Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 4 statements
  23. Government Orders Strengthening Canada's Defence Sector Act 34 statements
  24. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  25. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  26. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements