Mandatory programs for offenders
C-240 Offender Rehabilitation Act: An Act to amend the Criminal Code, to make related amendments to the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act
Allows judges to order offenders into educational or treatment programs in prison, and adds penalties for large-scale fentanyl trafficking.
What Bill C-240 would do
The bill would allow courts to order offenders serving prison time to take part in educational, training or treatment programs. Facility heads would have to include these required programs in an offender's correctional plan, and parole boards would consider their progress when reviewing parole. The bill would also require judges to treat large-scale quantities as an aggravating factor when sentencing people convicted of trafficking fentanyl.
Official summary
This enactment amends the Criminal Code to provide that a court may, by order, in addition to any term of imprisonment imposed on an offender for the commission of an offence, prescribe measures that the offender is to take during the custodial period of their sentence, which may include participation in educational, training or treatment programs. It also makes related amendments to the Corrections and Conditional Release Act to, among other things, provide that objectives with regard to programs that the offender may be required to complete during the custodial period of their sentence are to be included in the correctional plan developed by the head of the facility in which the offender is held and to provide that the assessments that parole boards take into consideration when making a determination regarding the granting of parole are to include information on the progress made by an offender with regard to any prescribed measures that the offender was required to take.
Finally, the enactment amends the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act to provide that a court imposing a sentence on a person convicted of trafficking in fentanyl must consider as an aggravating factor the fact that the person trafficked it in quantities that indicate trafficking on a large scale.
- Kind
- Private member's bill
- Sponsor
- Kelly DeRidder, Member of Parliament (Kitchener Centre)
- Introduced
- in the House of Commons
- Last activity
Where it stands
- ProposedSep 22, 2025
- Being studiedsince Jun 1 Exact stageAt consideration in committee in the House of Commons · Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security · since June 1, 2026A committee of MPs or senators is going through it line by line.
- Almost law
- Law
In a House committee since June 1
-
First reading in the House done
Before the House on 1 sitting day,
-
Second reading in the House done
Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security
Before the House on 2 sitting days, to · 2 debates here
2nd reading and referral to committee - JUST: agreed to,
-
Committee in the House now
Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security
-
Report stage in the House not yet
-
Third reading in the House not yet
-
First reading in the Senate not yet
-
Second reading in the Senate not yet
-
Third reading in the Senate not yet
-
Royal assent not yet
Exact procedural stages
-
House
- First reading in the House: done, 2025-09-22
- Second reading in the House: done, 2026-06-01
- Committee in the House: current stage
- Report stage in the House: not yet reached
- Third reading in the House: not yet reached
-
Senate
- First reading in the Senate: not yet reached
- Second reading in the Senate: not yet reached
- Third reading in the Senate: not yet reached
-
Royal assent
- Royal assent: not yet reached
Debates in the House 2
Members who spoke: Conservative 6 Liberal 5 Bloc Québécois 3
Second reading 2
-
8 members spoke
- Kelly DeRidder Conservative B statement 1, graded BC– statement 2, graded C–A+ statement 3, graded A+A+ statement 4, graded A+A+ statement 5, graded A+
- Ben Carr Liberal C statement 1, graded C
- Mario Beaulieu Bloc Québécois A+ statement 1, graded A+A+ statement 2, graded A+
- Tamara Kronis Conservative B statement 1, graded BA statement 2, graded A
- Lori Idlout Liberal A statement 1, graded A
- Kevin Lamoureux Liberal A– statement 1, graded A–
- Wade Grant Liberal A statement 1, graded A
- Yves Perron Bloc Québécois A+ statement 1, graded A+
-
7 members spoke
- Branden Leslie Conservative A+ statement 1, graded A+
- Kent MacDonald Liberal A+ statement 1, graded A+
- Marilène Gill Bloc Québécois A+ statement 1, graded A+
- Todd Doherty Conservative B+ statement 1, graded B+
- Helena Konanz Conservative A– statement 1, graded A–
- Laila Goodridge Conservative A– statement 1, graded A–
- Kelly DeRidder Conservative B+ statement 1, graded B+
Also raised in 2
Question Period, members' statements and other debates where the bill came up.