Youth

During question period, members questioned the government about youth unemployment and living costs. Conservative members cited figures including nearly 500,000 unemployed young Canadians in 2025, a 57% rise over three years, and youth unemployment approaching 19%, arguing that government debt, spending, taxes, and immigration policies have priced young people out of housing and jobs, and asking the government to change course and to consider Conservative proposals on youth jobs and parental leave. Liberal ministers and members replied that the government had reduced the deficit by $11 billion and is in a strong fiscal position, pointing to investments such as $6 billion in training and apprenticeships for young workers, jobs in projects like Darlington nuclear and technology employers like AMD, and supports such as child care, dental care, and school food programs, which they said Conservatives voted against. The exchange consisted largely of these opposing claims about the economy and government programs.Written by AI from the debate. Updated .

Official text (opens in a new tab)

7 statements

John Zerucelli, Secretary of State (Labour)

Liberal
“We lowered the deficit by $11 billion and lead the G7 in our finances. We are investing in infrastructure. This update will pay for more job training and apprenticeships, and help more young people, Indigenous people, and diverse workers get into the trades.”
  • A repeated line

    “That is how we build Canada strong.”

    Said 20 times by 14 members since April 23.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, Canada’s new government is fiscally responsible. We have reduced the deficit by $11 billion. We are in the strongest fiscal position in the G7. We are making major infrastructure investments that will transform and connect our economy. Our workers know this. Let us hear from our workers. Let us hear from the UA in the member’s riding. This update would deliver investments to expand training and for a multitude of apprenticeship needs. It would increase youth, indigenous and diverse participation in the trades for upcoming projects of national interest. That is how we build a Canada strong for all.

John Zerucelli, Secretary of State (Labour)

Liberal
“We are managing the country's money well, and we lowered the deficit by $11 billion. The Conservatives say they support Canadians, but they vote against tax relief, child care, dental care, and food for students. I want the Conservatives to list which programs they plan to cut.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 11 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
  • A repeated line

    “Dental care and the national school food program.”

    Said 4 times by 4 members since May 7.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, again, this new government is fiscally responsible. We reduced the deficit by $11 billion and we are in the strongest fiscal position in the G7. The Conservatives cannot stand up and say they support Canadians while voting against all the supports that Canadians rely on, including youth. The Conservatives oppose tax relief. They oppose child care. They oppose dental care and the national school food program. Who could be against that? The Conservatives cannot oppose all of those programs and then claim they support them. They cannot have it both ways. When will they table a list of inflationary spending items they are going to cut?

Gregor Robertson, Minister of Housing and Infrastructure and Minister responsible for Pacific Economic Development Canada

Liberal
“I want the opposition to vote for our economic update. It spends $6 billion to train young people to build homes and infrastructure.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 45 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I had the honour of being at the BCIT, the B.C. Institute of Technology, earlier this week to talk about 100,000 jobs for young Canadians to build homes and infrastructure. The members opposite have an opportunity to support the spring economic update, which would dedicate $6 billion to training young Canadians to be part of our economy and to build the affordable housing that we need to house young Canadians. It is a great opportunity for us to build Canada strong.

Ryan Turnbull, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Liberal
“The member from Oshawa complains about youth jobs, but she voted against government funding that is creating thousands of skilled trades jobs at the Darlington nuclear project.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 45 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I understand the member opposite’s concern for our youth, and I empathize with our youth. What I cannot understand is this. The member from Oshawa can go visit Ontario Power Generation and see the jobs that are being created in our region with the new nuclear project at Darlington. That is 21,700 jobs and a $2 billion investment through the government’s efforts that she voted against. How can that member stand here and lecture us about youth jobs in our region and in our country yet vote against the very supports that are creating good, skilled trades jobs across our region?

Karim Bardeesy, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Industry

Liberal
“Our plan creates jobs and supports tech companies like AMD, which brought thousands of jobs to York Region. Our support for universities and technology also helps all recent computer science graduates from the University of Toronto find work.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 41 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, our plan is investing in jobs and is supporting those private sector innovators that are bringing jobs, including to places like York Region in the member’s region, where AMD has a major facility and is centralizing its innovation supports in York Region, in Markham, bringing thousands of jobs. I recently visited the University of Toronto’s Master of Science in applied computing program, and every single one of its graduates now has a job in that program. It is because of the work our government is doing in supporting the post-secondary system, and supporting not only the industrial side but the technology side. We are very proud of our record.

Peter Fragiskatos, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship

Liberal
“Experts agree our government manages money well. Conservatives want to cut help for child care, child benefits, and school food. We believe the government should keep these programs to help Canadians.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, the International Monetary Fund has affirmed, as we know, the sound fiscal framework that the government has embraced. That is also true of the key rating agencies. My colleagues keep talking about a credit card. Yes, there are Canadians, young Canadians included, who do have credit card debt. Conservatives want to make it worse by forcing Canadians to not receive the Canada child benefit, to not receive support for child care and to not receive support for the school food program. Conservatives want Canadians to pay for these. In this country, we believe that government has a role in fundamentally making sure that Canadians have a chance. That is exactly what these programs do.

Patty Hajdu, Minister of Jobs and Families and Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Northern Ontario

Liberal
“The Conservatives should not vote against our child care program. It saves families money and helps women work and earn more.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, here is a big idea: Do not vote against child care that is saving families in Saskatchewan thousands of dollars a month per child, one of the most effective measures to make sure that young families get ahead, that women can participate in the workforce, that women’s productivity and wages grow along with their career and that CPP enhancements are there for women at the end of their career. Instead of their big ideas, maybe the Conservatives should stop voting against the big ideas that Canadians have fought so hard for.

Discussion

No comments yet

See the full discussion

Comment rules

More from sitting 119

  1. Government Orders Business of Supply 116 statements
  2. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  3. Oral Questions Natural Resources 4 statements
  4. Oral Questions Climate Change 6 statements
  5. Oral Questions Youth 14 statements
  6. Oral Questions The Economy 4 statements
  7. Oral Questions Youth 4 statements
  8. Oral Questions Veterans Affairs 2 statements
  9. Oral Questions International Trade 2 statements
  10. Oral Questions Health 4 statements
  11. Oral Questions Climate Change 4 statements
  12. Oral Questions International Trade 2 statements
  13. Oral Questions Indigenous Affairs 6 statements
  14. Oral Questions Youth 2 statements
  15. Oral Questions Foreign Affairs 2 statements
  16. Oral Questions Air Transportation 2 statements
  17. Oral Questions Climate Change 2 statements
  18. Oral Questions Aerospace Industry 4 statements
  19. Oral Questions Business of the House 2 statements
  20. Government Orders Business of Supply 69 statements
  21. Private Members' Business Financial Administration Act 11 statements
  22. Oral Questions Finance 4 statements
  23. Oral Questions National Defence 11 statements
  24. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  25. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements
  26. Adjournment Proceedings Adjournment Proceedings 4 statements